Health Care Policy Reform

2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-61
Author(s):  
Robert J. Parsons ◽  
Gary M. Woller ◽  
Giinther Neubauer ◽  
Frank Thomas Rothaemel ◽  
Barbara Zelle
2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Mintz ◽  
Donald Palmer

1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne MacFarlane

The trend toward greater citizen participation in health care policy reform has its roots in the consumerism of the 1960s. This era witnessed the beginning of a dispersion of power in health care and an increase in the number and variety of stakeholders involved in the policy development process. Using the reform of Ontario's long-term care policy as a case example, this paper offers observations about the benefits and challenges of participative policy-making. Despite the challenges and the paucity of hard evidence pointing to benefits, the author concludes that broad citizen participation in health care policy reform is a desirable goal. However, the capacity for genuine collaboration remains underdeveloped and requires more systematic refinement.


2000 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Mintz ◽  
Donald Palmer

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-502
Author(s):  
Adam Hannah

Understanding of the role of ideas in non-paradigmatic policy change has been advanced by the introduction of the concept of bricolage, which suggests that reformers are likely to piece together ideas from disparate sources. However, the current literature is limited in several ways. As such, this article proposes three main contributions to the field. First, the use of bricolage as a pragmatic strategy is perfectly compatible with actors being motivated by relatively fixed policy goals or seeking to imitate policies from elsewhere. Second, the creative use of ideas can be limited by the imposition of narrow frames or problem definitions by the victors of agenda-setting battles. Third, the use of bricolage comes with more potential for conflict and unintended consequences than has been recognised. This argument is illustrated through an analysis of healthcare reform in the United States in 2009/10, focusing particularly on the fate of the ‘public option’.


Author(s):  
Graeme Currie ◽  
Graham Martin

In this chapter we undertake a narrative analysis of health care policy reform. We consider the beguiling and rhetorical quality of health care policy reform, and how it positions “heroes” and “villains” as it attempts to shape imagined futures, under three narrative themes—management, measurement; markets. However, we highlight the policy narrative is not entirely beguiling. A countervailing professional narrative argues that regulatory bodies and clients put their trust in the experts, which has made change slow to realize in some areas. Meanwhile, a narrative critical of policy reform makes the case for a return to bureaucracy to counter excesses of flexibility, adaptability and emphasis upon delivery associated with new public management and entrepreneurial governance. To illustrate our analysis, we draw upon a particularly propitious health care setting for policy reform, that of the English NHS. We suggest our analysis is not just transferable to other national contexts, underpinned by new public managment policy, but extends to reforms in other national settings, although the detail of the management, measurement and market themes may vary on the ground, as illustrated in the case of the US and Nordic countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document