"Aging in Place": Discharge Policies and Procedures Concerning Frailty Among Senior Housing Tenants

1991 ◽  
Vol 16 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 109-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy W. Sheehan ◽  
Steven K. Wisensale
2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-188
Author(s):  
Tanja Tyvimaa ◽  
◽  
Karen M. Gibler ◽  

Most elderly Finnish residents prefer to age in place, but some relocate because of push factors that create stress in their current homes and pull factors that attract them to a new dwelling. This survey examines the important pull factors that attract seniors to senior houses. Grocery nearby is the strongest pull factor followed by hospital or medical center and public transportation. A factor analysis reveals that attributes can be grouped into three factors: onsite services that allow the residents to maintain an active lifestyle with some luxury, everyday services and facilities that would enable aging in place, and physical activity facilities. Residents have chosen the type of senior housing that supports their lifestyle. Meanwhile, socioeconomic characteristics do not explain the differences in the types of features that attract residents.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sojung Park ◽  
BoRin Kim ◽  
Yoonsun Han

Objective: We examined cumulative and differential experiences of aging in place. Method: Data came from the 2002 and 2010 wave of the Health Retirement Study. We modeled the trajectory of later-life depressive symptoms, and how senior-housing environments moderate the negative association between economic disadvantages and depressive symptoms. Results: At baseline, economically disadvantaged older adults were more likely to exhibit depressive symptoms. However, detrimental effects of income group (non-low income vs. moderate income; non-low income vs. low income) on depressive symptoms did not significantly change over time. The age-leveler hypothesis may account for nonsignificant effects of disadvantaged income groups over time. Discussion: Findings suggest that moderate-income seniors may experience positive differentials if they age in place in a supportive senior-housing environment. Moderate-income seniors may have broader opportunities in senior housing compared to private-home peers. Senior housing might partially counter risks such as low mental health, emerging from life-course disadvantage.


2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn Rantz ◽  
Lori L. Popejoy ◽  
Colleen Galambos ◽  
Lorraine J. Phillips ◽  
Kari R. Lane ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1327-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sojung Park ◽  
Yoonsun Han ◽  
BoRin Kim ◽  
Ruth E. Dunkle

Based on the premise that the experience of aging in place is different for vulnerable subgroups of older adults compared with less vulnerable subgroups, we focus on low-income older adults as a vulnerable subgroup and senior housing as an alternative to a conventional, private home environment. Using the 2008 and 2010 waves of the Health Retirement Study, regression models determined the impact of person–environment (P-E) fit between poverty status and residence in senior housing on self-rated health. Consistent with the environmental docility hypothesis, findings show that, among low-income individuals, the supportive environment of senior housing plays a pronounced compensating role and may be a key to successful adaptation in aging. As the first research effort to empirically demonstrate the positive health effects of senior housing among socioeconomically vulnerable elders, our findings provide a much-needed theoretical and practical underpinning for policy-making efforts regarding vulnerable elders.


2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn J. Rantz ◽  
Lorraine Phillips ◽  
Myra Aud ◽  
Lori Popejoy ◽  
Karen Dorman Marek ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Henning ◽  
Ulla Åhnby ◽  
Stefan Österström

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Lisbeth Lindahl ◽  

Moving accommodation in old age challenges the idea of aging in place. This study describes older people’s (M = 80 years) reasons for moving to senior housing in Sweden and whether different reasons were related to the participants’ background characteristics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document