scholarly journals Regulatory Requirements of Quality Assurance Program in Nuclear Medicine – Review of the Procedures

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1863-1867
Author(s):  
Reda Hallab ◽  
khalida Eddaoui ◽  
Hmad Ouabi ◽  
Nouzha Ben Raïs Aouad

The quality assurance program ensures that the entire radiological system and associated equipment are functioning properly and optimally. To this end, it is essential that a quality assurance program be in place in each medical facility where ionizing radiation sources are used, to verify the proper functioning of these instruments as well as the radionuclides measured in nuclear medicine. In addition, the procedures of the quality assurance program must comply with regulatory requirements and international recommendations. The method of this study is to review the regulatory requirements adopted by different countries regarding the quality assurance program procedures as well as various recent scientific works and those published by the International Atomic Energy Agency. In addition, to compare the radiation protection requirements of the procedures of the mentioned works; exposure justification and optimization, quality control, registration system, professional training and audit system and to suggest improvements. The result of the review study, add a procedure to the quality assurance program, so that the quality assurance attempts to cover all procedures involving sources of ionizing radiation, thus ensuring compliance with the standards of radiological safety in nuclear medicine facilities.

Radiocarbon ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Long

The purpose of this Quality Assurance (QA) protocol is to summarize guidelines that have been accepted by directors of many radiocarbon dating laboratories throughout the world, and by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Some laboratories have followed similar procedures successfully for years. Laboratories that carefully adhere to this protocol will produce consistently reliable data that will be comparable in accuracy to all other laboratories following this or any other equally rigorous quality assurance program. This statement does not, however, pertain to samples with 14C activities highly sensitive to method or degree of pretreatment, as pretreatment techniques vary among laboratories.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazimierz Rozanski ◽  
Willibald Stichler ◽  
Roberto Gonfiantini ◽  
E. M. Scott ◽  
R. P. Beukens ◽  
...  

As a follow-up to the meeting of experts convened at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in February 1989, and the International 14C Workshop held in Glasgow in September 1989, the 14C Quality Assurance Program was formulated. In a joint effort of several radiocarbon teams and IAEA staff, we have prepared a set of five new intercomparison materials. These are natural materials frequently used by radiocarbon laboratories. The materials were distributed to 137 laboratories in May 1990. In February 1991, a meeting of experts was convened in Vienna to evaluate the results, to determine the radiocarbon activity of the five samples expressed in % Modern (pMC) terms and to define the 13C/12C ratio, and to make recommendations on further use of these materials. We present here the results of the exercise and the agreed consensus values for each of the five materials and discuss the different analyses that were undertaken.


2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Mizuno ◽  
Shigekazu Fukuda ◽  
Akifumi Fukumura ◽  
Yuzuru-Kutsutani Nakamura ◽  
Cao Jianping ◽  
...  

Abstract A dose audit of 16 facilities in 11 countries has been performed within the framework of the Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia (FNCA) quality assurance program. The quality of radiation dosimetry varies because of the large variation in radiation therapy among the participating countries. One of the most important aspects of international multicentre clinical trials is uniformity of absolute dose between centres. The National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) in Japan has conducted a dose audit of participating countries since 2006 by using radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters (RGDs). RGDs have been successfully applied to a domestic postal dose audit in Japan. The authors used the same audit system to perform a dose audit of the FNCA countries. The average and standard deviation of the relative deviation between the measured and intended dose among 46 beams was 0.4% and 1.5% (k = 1), respectively. This is an excellent level of uniformity for the multicountry data. However, of the 46 beams measured, a single beam exceeded the permitted tolerance level of ±5%. We investigated the cause for this and solved the problem. This event highlights the importance of external audits in radiation therapy.


2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (spe) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo Maranhão Dantas ◽  
Eder Augusto de Lucena ◽  
Ana Letícia Almeida Dantas

The manipulation of unsealed sources in nuclear medicine poses significant risks of internal exposure to the staff. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the radiological protection program should include an evaluation of such risks and an individual monitoring plan, assuring acceptable radiological safety conditions in the workplace. The IAEA Safety Guide RS-G-1.2 recommends that occupational monitoring should be implemented whenever it is likely that committed effective doses from annual intakes of radionuclides would exceed 1 mSv. It also suggests a mathematical criterion to determine the need to implement internal monitoring. This paper presents a simulation of the IAEA criteria applied to commonly used radionuclides in nuclear medicine, taking into consideration usual manipulated activities and handling conditions. It is concluded that the manipulation of 131I for therapy presents the higher risk of internal exposure to the workers, requiring the implementation of an internal monitoring program by the Nuclear Medicine Centers.


Radiocarbon ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Long

The purpose of this Quality Assurance (QA) protocol is to summarize guidelines that have been accepted by the majority of directors of radiocarbon dating laboratories throughout the world, and by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Laboratories that carefully adhere to this protocol will produce consistently reliable data which will be comparable in accuracy to all other laboratories following this or any other equally rigorous quality assurance program. This statement does not, however, pertain to samples with 14C activities highly sensitive to method or degree of pretreatment, as pretreatment techniques vary among laboratories.


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (01) ◽  
pp. 97-108
Author(s):  
W. F. Shanahan ◽  
D. E. Jenny

The paper reviews the history and planning of the Quality Assurance Program in naval shipyards. Formal procedures for testing and inspection are outlined and an exacting audit system whereby the shipyard can keep a close check on its own progress is described. The authors emphasize the need to motivate shipyard personnel to be quality-minded.


2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (Supplement3) ◽  
pp. 351-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Rahimian ◽  
Joseph C. Chen ◽  
Ajay A. Rao ◽  
Michael R. Girvigian ◽  
Michael J. Miller ◽  
...  

Object. Stringent geometrical accuracy and precision are required in the stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of patients. Accurate targeting is especially important when treating a patient in a single fraction of a very high radiation dose (90 Gy) to a small target such as that used in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (3 to 4—mm diameter). The purpose of this study was to determine the inaccuracies in each step of the procedure including imaging, fusion, treatment planning, and finally the treatment. The authors implemented a detailed quality-assurance program. Methods. Overall geometrical accuracy of the Novalis stereotactic system was evaluated using a Radionics Geometric Phantom Chamber. The phantom has several magnetic resonance (MR) and computerized tomography (CT) imaging—friendly objects of various shapes and sizes. Axial 1-mm-thick MR and CT images of the phantom were acquired using a T1-weighted three-dimensional spoiled gradient recalled pulse sequence and the CT scanning protocols used clinically in patients. The absolute errors due to MR image distortion, CT scan resolution, and the image fusion inaccuracies were measured knowing the exact physical dimensions of the objects in the phantom. The isocentric accuracy of the Novalis gantry and the patient support system was measured using the Winston—Lutz test. Because inaccuracies are cumulative, to calculate the system's overall spatial accuracy, the root mean square (RMS) of all the errors was calculated. To validate the accuracy of the technique, a 1.5-mm-diameter spherical marker taped on top of a radiochromic film was fixed parallel to the x–z plane of the stereotactic coordinate system inside the phantom. The marker was defined as a target on the CT images, and seven noncoplanar circular arcs were used to treat the target on the film. The calculated system RMS value was then correlated with the position of the target and the highest density on the radiochromic film. The mean spatial errors due to image fusion and MR imaging were 0.41 ± 0.3 and 0.22 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. Gantry and couch isocentricities were 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.15 mm, respectively. The system overall RMS values were 0.9 and 0.6 mm with and without the couch errors included, respectively (isocenter variations due to couch rotation are microadjusted between couch positions). The positional verification of the marker was within 0.7 ± 0.1 mm of the highest optical density on the radiochromic film, correlating well with the system's overall RMS value. The overall mean system deviation was 0.32 ± 0.42 mm. Conclusions. The highest spatial errors were caused by image fusion and gantry rotation. A comprehensive quality-assurance program was developed for the authors' stereotactic radiosurgery program that includes medical imaging, linear accelerator mechanical isocentricity, and treatment delivery. For a successful treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with a 4-mm cone, the overall RMS value of equal to or less than 1 mm must be guaranteed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document