Pain associated with cemented and uncemented long-stemmed tibial components in revision total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6 Supple A) ◽  
pp. 165-170
Author(s):  
Darin J. Larson ◽  
John H. Rosenberg ◽  
Maxwell A. Lawlor ◽  
Kevin L. Garvin ◽  
Curtis W. Hartman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Stem Length ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Patient Dissatisfaction ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Revision Tka

Aims Stemmed tibial components are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, overall pain, and diaphyseal tibial pain in patients who underwent revision TKA with cemented or uncemented stemmed tibial components. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study involving 110 patients with revision TKA with cemented versus uncemented stemmed tibial components. Patients who underwent revision TKA with stemmed tibial components over a 15-year period at a single institution with at least two-year follow-up were assessed. Pain was evaluated through postal surveys. There were 63 patients with cemented tibial stems and 47 with uncemented stems. Radiographs and Knee Society Scores were used to evaluate for objective findings associated with pain or patient dissatisfaction. Postal surveys were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and the independent-samples t-test. Logistic regression was used to adjust for age, sex, and preoperative bone loss. Results No statistically significant differences in stem length, operative side, or indications for revision were found between the two cohorts. Tibial pain at the end of the stem was present in 25.3% (16/63) of cemented stems and 25.5% (12/47) of uncemented stems (p = 1.000); 74.6% (47/63) of cemented patients and 78.7% (37/47) of uncemented patients were satisfied following revision TKA (p = 0.657). Conclusion There were no differences in patient satisfaction, overall pain, and diaphyseal tibial pain in cemented and uncemented stemmed tibial components in revision TKA. Patient factors, rather than implant selection and surgical technique, likely play a large role in the presence of postoperative pain. Stemmed tibial components have been shown to be a possible source of pain in revision TKA. There is no difference in patient satisfaction or postoperative pain with cemented or uncemented stemmed tibial components in revision TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):165–170.

scholarly journals Modified hybrid cementing technique reduces stem tip pain and improves patient’s satisfaction after revision total knee arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Soo Kim ◽  
In Jun Koh ◽  
Sueen Sohn ◽  
Hyung Chul Park ◽  
Yong In
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Pain Patient ◽  
Cementing Technique ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Revision Tka ◽  
Revision Tkas ◽  
Cementing Techniques

Abstract Background There have been no studies comparing patient-reported outcome measures including end-of-stem tip pain and patient satisfaction based on the use of cementing techniques in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare end-of-stem tip pain and PROMs with hybrid and modified hybrid cementing techniques in revision TKAs. Method Sixty-two cases of revision TKA performed by a single surgeon were divided into two groups based on the cementing technique with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Two types of cementing technique for femoral and tibial stems were used as follows: (1) a hybrid cementing technique (33 cases), in which cement was applied immediately distal to the modular junction of the stem and the component while the distal stem was press-fitted into the diaphysis without using cement; and (2) a modified hybrid cementing technique (29 cases), in which cement was applied to the tip of femoral and tibial stems. The thigh and shin were assessed for the end-of-stem tip pain. Patient satisfaction was evaluated based on the satisfaction items of New Knee Society Score. Results Modified hybrid cementing significantly lowered the percentage of patients manifesting shin pain (3.4% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.029). Patients treated with the modified hybrid cementing technique showed a higher satisfaction rate (p = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an increase in the odds of satisfaction 32.686-fold (p = 0.004) in patients without pain at the end-of-stem tip in the shin and 9.261-fold (p = 0.027) in patients treated with the modified hybrid cementing technique. Conclusion The modified hybrid cementing technique for fixation of long-stem in revision TKAs reduced the end-of-stem tip pain in the shin, leading to significantly higher satisfaction compared with the hybrid cementing technique after revision TKA. Level of evidence Level III

scholarly journals Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake von Hintze ◽  
Mika Niemeläinen ◽  
Harri Sintonen ◽  
Jyrki Nieminen ◽  
Antti Eskelinen
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Revision Tka

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to determine the mid-term clinical, radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes and define the survival rate in patients who had undergone revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the single rotating hinged knee (RHK) design. Methods Between January 2004 and December 2013, 125 revision TKAs were performed at our institution using the single RHK implant. We conducted both a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected outcome data of these patients and a prospective follow-up study of all 39 living patients (41 knees). The follow-up phase included an optional extra follow-up visit, PROM questionnaires, and plain radiographs. Results The ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the revision RHK knees was 81.7% (95% CI 71.9–91.6%) with re-revision for any reason as the endpoint. Overall, 15 knees (12% of the total) underwent re-revision surgery during the follow-up. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0–12.7 years) post-operatively for the baseline group. One mechanical hinge mechanism-related failure occurred without any history of trauma or infection. At the time of the final follow-up, the majority of patients evinced a fairly good clinical outcome measured with patient-reported outcome measures and none of the components were radiographically loose. Conclusion We found that in patients undergoing complex revision TKA, fairly good functional outcome and quality of life can be achieved using an RHK implant. Further, it seems that in this type of patient cohort, revision TKA using an RHK implant relieves pain more than it improves ability to function. The NexGen® RHK design can be regarded as a suitable option in complex revision TKA.

Isolated tibial insert exchange in revision total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6) ◽  
pp. 1103-1110
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Tetreault ◽  
Jeremy T. Hines ◽  
Daniel J. Berry ◽  
Mark W. Pagnano ◽  
Robert T. Trousdale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Polyethylene Wear ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Common Reason ◽  
Original Diagnosis ◽  
Tibial Insert ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Component Loosening ◽  
Revision Tka

Aims This study aimed to determine outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange (ITIE) during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods From 1985 to 2016, 270 ITIEs were performed at one institution for instability (55%, n = 148), polyethylene wear (39%, n = 105), insert fracture/dissociation (5%, n = 14), or stiffness (1%, n = 3). Patients with component loosening, implant malposition, infection, and extensor mechanism problems were excluded. Results Survivorship free of any re-revision was 68% at ten years. For the indication of insert wear, survivorship free of any re-revision at ten years was 74%. Re-revisions were more frequent for index diagnoses other than wear (hazard ratio (HR) 1.9; p = 0.013), with ten-year survivorships of 69% for instability and 37% for insert fracture/dissociation. Following ITIE for wear, the most common reason for re-revision was aseptic loosening (33%, n = 7). For other indications, the most common reason for re-revision was recurrence of the original diagnosis. Mean Knee Society Scores improved from 54 (0 to 94) preoperatively to 77 (38 to 94) at ten years. Conclusion After ITIE, the risk and reasons for re-revision correlated with preoperative indications. The best results were for polyethylene wear. For other diagnoses, the re-revision rate was higher and the failure mode was most commonly recurrence of the original indication for the revision TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1103–1110.

Different Doses of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyile Chen ◽  
Chenchen Zhao ◽  
Yue Luo ◽  
Qiuru Wang ◽  
Qianhao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Revision Tka ◽  
Different Doses

Abstract Purpose This article assessed the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods We retrospectively identified 122 patients in our institution who underwent revision TKA with a history of perioperative intravenous TXA utilization. According to the sum of intravenous TXA documented, all patients were divided into three groups: 1 g intravenous TXA, 2 g intravenous TXA, and equal or greater than 3 g intravenous TXA. The primary outcomes included total blood loss (TBL), hidden blood loss (HBL), transfusion rate, and the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism among the three groups. A correlation analysis was conducted to analyze the correlation between the dose of TXA and the blood loss. Results In total, there was no significance difference in TBL and revised HBL (rHBL) between the first two groups (1 g/dL for intravenous TXA, 2 g/dL for intravenous TXA; p = 0.486; p = 0.525). Equal or greater than 3 g intravenous TXA (≥3 g/dL for intravenous TXA) reached a significant reduction in TBL, rHBL, and length of stay compared with the first two groups (p = 0.01; p = 0.01; p = 0.01). The rate of transfusion between the three groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.21). Due to the limitations in sample size, only one symptomatic venous thromboembolism was reported in the 1 g intravenous TXA group. Conclusion Applying the dose of intravenous TXA equal or greater than 3 g in revision TKA might further reduce the blood loss and shorten the length of stay.

scholarly journals Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anay Rajendra Patel ◽  
Brian Barlow ◽  
Amar S. Ranawat
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Stem Length ◽  
Total Knee

Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 990-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Barrack ◽  
Gerard Engh ◽  
Cecil Rorabeck ◽  
Jaswin Sawhney ◽  
Michael Woolfrey
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Aseptic Revision ◽  
Total Knee

Chronic Postoperative Pain After Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian K. Petersen ◽  
Ole Simonsen ◽  
Mogens B. Laursen ◽  
Thomas A. Nielsen ◽  
Sten Rasmussen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Chronic Postoperative Pain ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Long-term result of a second or third two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty

Arthroplasty ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Hoo Kim ◽  
Jang-Won Park ◽  
Young-Soo Jang
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Recurrent Infection ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Revision Tka

Abstract Background Persistent or recurrent infection after two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of an infected TKA is a dreaded complication. The purpose of the current study was to determine the ability of a second or third two-stage revision TKA to control infection, evaluate the long-term survivorship of the TKA prosthesis, and measure the functional outcome after a second or third two-stage revision TKA for reinfection. Methods We evaluated 63 patients (65 knees) with failed two-stage TKA treated with a second or a third two-stage revision TKA. There were 25 men and 38 women (mean age, 67 ± 10.2 years). The mean follow-up from the time of a second two-stage TKA revision was 15.1 years (range, 10 to 19 years) and the mean follow-up from the time of a third two-stage TKA revision was 7 years (range, 5 to 10 years). Results Overall, infection was successfully controlled in 49 (78%) of 65 knees after a second two-stage revision TKA was performed. In the remaining 16 knees, recurrent infection was successfully controlled in 12 knees (75%) after a third two-stage revision TKA. Survivorship, free of implant removal for recurrent infection, was 94% at 15.1 years (95% CI, 91 to 100%). Survival free of revision TKA for mechanical failure was 95% (95% CI, 92 to 100%). Conclusions The results of the current study suggest that a second or a third two-stage revision TKA is a reasonable option for controlling infection, relieving pain, and achieving a satisfactory level of function for patients with infected TKAs.

scholarly journals Revision total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
Paul Stirling ◽  
Scott D. Middleton ◽  
Ivan J. Brenkel ◽  
Phil J. Walmsley
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Lateral Release ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Primary Tkas ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Revision Tka

Introduction The primary aim of this study was to describe a baseline comparison of early knee-specific functional outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using metaphyseal sleeves with a matched cohort of patients undergoing primary TKA. The secondary aim was to compare incidence of complications and length of stay (LOS) between the two groups. Methods Patients undergoing revision TKA for all diagnoses between 2009 and 2016 had patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected prospectively. PROMs consisted of the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12). The study cohort was identified retrospectively and demographics were collected. The cohort was matched to a control group of patients undergoing primary TKA. Results Overall, 72 patients underwent revision TKA and were matched with 72 primary TKAs with a mean follow-up of 57 months (standard deviation (SD) 20 months). The only significant difference in postoperative PROMs was a worse AKSS pain score in the revision group (36 vs 44, p = 0.002); however, these patients still produced an improvement in the pain score. There was no significant difference in improvement of AKSS or SF-12 between the two groups. LOS (9.3 days vs 4.6 days) and operation time (1 hour 56 minutes vs 1 hour 7 minutes) were significantly higher in the revision group (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing revision were significantly more likely to require intraoperative lateral release and postoperative urinary catheterisation (p < 0.001). Conclusion This matched-cohort study provides results of revision TKA using modern techniques and implants and outlines what results patients can expect to achieve using primary TKA as a control. This should be useful to clinicians counselling patients for revision TKA.

Removal of Well-Fixed Tibial Cone in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty—A Uniquely Challenging Yet Necessary Scenario

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Scully ◽  
Matthew E. Deren ◽  
Assem A. Sultan ◽  
Linsen T. Samuel ◽  
William Nageotte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
The United States ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Midterm Results ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Revision Tka

AbstractThe number of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the United States continues to increase. While advancements in implant design and surgical technique have led to improved outcomes compared with historical data, these cases remain technically demanding with high rates of aseptic failure and worse patient reported outcome scores compared with primary total knee arthroplasty. One particular problem commonly encountered in revision knee arthroplasty is bone loss, particularly in the epiphyseal region, which negatively impacts the structural integrity of the implants. Various modular metaphyseal sleeves and cones in conjunction with stemmed implants have been designed to enhance metaphyseal fixation, corroborated by multiple studies demonstrating excellent midterm results involving cones, and sleeves. Commercially available revision systems that incorporate metaphyseal cones are currently widely utilized in revision TKA. For tibial defects, both symmetric and asymmetric cone options are available. Excellent midterm results have been reported with use of this device in the setting of severe proximal tibial bone loss in revision TKA surgery. With the enhanced fixation provided by various sleeve and cone augments, implant removal in the setting of recurrent infection or implant failure can be extremely challenging. Consequently, in this work, we sought to describe an algorithmic approach for removing a tibial cone in conjunction with the overlying tibial baseplate. A review of the literature has also been conducted for complex surgical techniques regarding removal of well-fixed implants in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document