scholarly journals Pelvic discontinuity: a challenge to overcome

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 459-471
Author(s):  
George C. Babis ◽  
Vasileios S. Nikolaou

Pelvic discontinuity (PD) has been a considerable challenge for the hip revision arthroplasty surgeon. However, not all PDs are the same. Some occur during primary cup insertion, resembling a fresh periprosthetic fracture that separates the superior and inferior portions of the pelvis, while others are chronic as a result of gradual acetabular bone loss due to osteolysis and/or acetabular implant loosening. In the past, ORIF, various types of cages, bone grafts and bone cement were utilized with little success. Today, the biomechanics and biology of PD as well as new diagnostic tools and especially a variety of new implants and techniques are available to hip revision surgeons. Ultraporous cups and augments, cup-cage constructs and custom triflange components have revolutionized the treatment of PD when used in various combinations with ORIF and bone grafts. For chronic PD the cup-cage construct is the most popular method of reconstruction with good medium-term results. Dislocation continues to be the leading cause of failure in all situations, followed by infection. Ultimately, surgeons today have a big enough armamentarium to select the best treatment approach. Case individualization, personal experience and improvisation are the best assets to drive treatment decisions and strategies. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:459-471. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210022

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. C. Mathijssen ◽  
P. D. Sturm ◽  
P. Pilot ◽  
R. M. Bloem ◽  
P. Buma ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
N. V Zagorodniy ◽  
V. I Nuzhdin ◽  
K. M Bukhtin ◽  
S. V Kagramanov

Treatment results for 114 total hip revision arthroplasties (1992—2011) with cemented femur components were analyzed. The most common indication for surgery was aseptic instability of hip implant. In 1 st group (42 operations) cemented stems Bi-Metric (Biomet Orthopaedics) and in 2 nd group (72 operations) cemented stems ESI (Endoservis) were used. Surgical technique was described and causes of complication development were analyzed. Mean follow-up made up 11 years. In the 1 st group excellent results were achieved in 2 (4.76%) cases, good in 34 (80.95%), satisfactory in 3 (7.14%) and poor in 3 (7.14%) cases. In the 2 nd group corresponding results were achieved in 3 (4.17%), 47 (65.28%), 15 (20.83%) and 7(9.72) respectively. Analysis of the reasons for complication development was performed. It was stated that femur defects of type 3 on level 1 by AAOS classification resulted in fatigue fractures of cemented revision stems.


1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Nivbrant ◽  
Johan Kärrholm ◽  
Ingemar Önsten ◽  
Åke Carlsson ◽  
Finnur Snorrason

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Schuh ◽  
Ralph Schuh ◽  
Albert Fujak ◽  
Wolfgang Hönle ◽  
Sandeep Kashyap

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduard Tornero ◽  
Arturo Pereira ◽  
Jessica Bravo ◽  
Silvia Angulo ◽  
Misericordia Basora ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Schmidt ◽  
M. Porsch ◽  
C. Sulk ◽  
J. Hillekamp ◽  
T. Schneider

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 901-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
John I. Khoury ◽  
Arthur L. Malkani ◽  
Edward M. Adler ◽  
David C. Markel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document