scholarly journals Hemiarthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty in fractured neck of femur: a shift in national practice?

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-92
Author(s):  
AM Khan ◽  
M Rafferty ◽  
JS Daurka

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the trends in national practice regarding total hip arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty in fractured neck of femur between 2010 and 2016. Materials and methods A retrospective review was conducted of NHS Digital data (England) between 2010 and 2016. ‘Emergency’ neck of femur fracture admissions, hemiarthroplasties and total hip arthroplasties were included. Elective total hip arthroplasties, revisions and prostheses relocations were excluded. Annual percentages for each operation were calculated. Trends were tabulated and displayed graphically for analysis. Results The total number of emergency neck of femur diagnoses was 257,789. Total hip arthroplasty was performed in 2217, 2737, 3305, 3686, 3670 and 3825 patients and hemiarthroplasty was performed in 21,335, 21,744, 21,115, 21,798, 21,804 and 22,163 patients for each year between 2011 and 2016, respectively. The rate of change for total hip arthroplasty slowed from 24.54% increase/year (2011–2013) to 5.24% increase/year (2013–2016). Uncemented arthroplasties decreased over the same time period. Discussion Increasing numbers of total hip arthroplasties are conducted for hip fractures; however, this trend has slowed since 2013. Possible explanations include all eligible fractures being treated with total hip arthroplasty, trauma surgeon preference for hemiarthroplasty due to lower surgical specialism or publication of individual surgeon data (National Joint Registry) which may lead to surgeons favouring hemiarthroplasties which have a lower complication rate compared to elective total hip arthroplasties.

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will K.M. Kieffer ◽  
Edward J.C. Dawe ◽  
Edward A.O. Lindisfarne ◽  
Benedict A. Rogers ◽  
Stephen Nicol ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-345
Author(s):  
J Craik ◽  
R Geleit ◽  
J Hiddema ◽  
E Bray ◽  
R Hampton ◽  
...  

Introduction Total hip arthroplasty is recommended for elderly patients with fractured neck of femur who are independently mobile, have few co-morbidities and are not cognitively impaired. Providing a daily total hip arthroplasty service is challenging for some units in the UK and considering that these patients may be physiologically distinct from the average hip fracture patient, loss of the best practice tariff as a result of surgical delay may be unjustified. The aim of this study was to determine whether time to surgical intervention for patients eligible for total hip arthroplasty had a negative impact on patient complications, length of stay and functional outcomes. Methods All patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur at our institution over a ten-year period were identified. Complications and functional outcomes were compared between patients receiving total hip arthroplasty before and after 36 hours. Results Of 112 consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 70 responded to a questionnaire or telephone consultation. Four patients were excluded owing to delayed presentation, the presence of advanced rheumatoid arthritis or a pathological fracture. Two-thirds (64%) of the remaining 66 patients underwent surgery within 36 hours of presentation. There were no significant differences between the groups of patients receiving surgery before or after 36 hours with regard to postoperative length of stay, complications, Oxford hip scores or visual analogue scale scores for state of health. Conclusions Delaying surgery for patients eligible for total hip arthroplasty as per the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines is justified and should not incur loss of the best practice tariff.


2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.S. Pai

A modified lateral approach of Hardinge allows adequate access for orientation of the implant was described. Although this approach is more difficult than the posterior approach, there is a learning curve, when mastered, it'll definitely reduce the incidence of dislocation. In the Author's opinion, this approach should be used routinely for total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur where the incidence of dislocation is unacceptably high using the posterior approach.


Injury ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 727-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpit K. Patel ◽  
Robert U. Ashford ◽  
Antonio Frasquet-Garcia ◽  
Catherine Booth ◽  
Stephen R. Joseph ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (1) ◽  
pp. 92-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. A. Harris ◽  
A. Cuthbert ◽  
R. de Steiger ◽  
P. Lewis ◽  
S. E. Graves

Aims Displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) may be treated with partial (hemiarthroplasty, HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA), with recent recommendations advising that THA be used in community-ambulant patients. This study aims to determine the association between the proportion of FNF treated with THA and year of surgery, day of the week, surgeon practice, and private versus public hospitals, adjusting for known confounders. Patients and Methods Data from 67 620 patients in the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) from 1999 to 2016 inclusive were used to generate unadjusted and adjusted analyses of the associations between patient, time, surgeon and institution factors, and the proportion of FNF treated with THA. Results Overall, THA was used in 23.7% of patients. THA was more frequently used over time, in younger patients, in healthier patients, in cases performed on weekdays (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.41), in private hospitals (adjusted OR 4.34; 95% CI 3.94 to 4.79) and by surgeons whose hip arthroplasty practice has a relatively higher proportion of elective patients (adjusted OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.49 to 1.83). Conclusion Practice variation exists in the proportion of FNF patients treated with THA due to variables other than patient factors. This may reflect variation in resources available and surgeon preference, and uncertainty regarding the relative indication.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Travis ◽  
Ruth S. Tan ◽  
Penisimani Funaki ◽  
Steve J. McChesney ◽  
Sandeep C. Patel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (04) ◽  
pp. 155-157
Author(s):  
Michael Newman ◽  
David Hartwright

AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess a large, single-surgeon dataset of uncemented total hip arthroplasties that had been templated using software. This assessment compared preoperative templated predictions with what was implanted with regard to (1) femoral prosthesis size and (2) acetabular cup size. The operation notes for two types of uncemented total hip arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon between January 9, 2008, and March 21, 2019, were assessed. The data were refined so that only those that were fully templated on a correctly calibrated pelvic radiograph were included. This provided a total of 153 cases. The predicted software template was compared with actual implanted component sizes. With regard to the femoral stems, the templating software was exactly correct in 45.75% of cases and was accurate to within one size in 87.59% of cases. With regard to the acetabular component, the templating software was exactly correct in 52.94% of cases and was accurate to within one size (2 mm) in 86.94% of cases. Templating software offers an accurate prediction of the size of uncemented femoral and acetabular components. In addition, the benefits of templating include cognitive rehearsal, insight into potentially challenging aspects of surgery, and highlighting intraoperative issues where there is a large intraoperative deviation from what is templated. This study demonstrates the congruence and reproducibility of templating software when compared with other smaller studies performed in the literature.


Injury Extra ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Z. Gamie ◽  
J. Neale ◽  
D. Shields ◽  
J. Claydon ◽  
S. Hazarika ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document