scholarly journals The effect of time to surgery on outcomes and complication rates following total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-345
Author(s):  
J Craik ◽  
R Geleit ◽  
J Hiddema ◽  
E Bray ◽  
R Hampton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Total Hip

Introduction Total hip arthroplasty is recommended for elderly patients with fractured neck of femur who are independently mobile, have few co-morbidities and are not cognitively impaired. Providing a daily total hip arthroplasty service is challenging for some units in the UK and considering that these patients may be physiologically distinct from the average hip fracture patient, loss of the best practice tariff as a result of surgical delay may be unjustified. The aim of this study was to determine whether time to surgical intervention for patients eligible for total hip arthroplasty had a negative impact on patient complications, length of stay and functional outcomes. Methods All patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur at our institution over a ten-year period were identified. Complications and functional outcomes were compared between patients receiving total hip arthroplasty before and after 36 hours. Results Of 112 consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 70 responded to a questionnaire or telephone consultation. Four patients were excluded owing to delayed presentation, the presence of advanced rheumatoid arthritis or a pathological fracture. Two-thirds (64%) of the remaining 66 patients underwent surgery within 36 hours of presentation. There were no significant differences between the groups of patients receiving surgery before or after 36 hours with regard to postoperative length of stay, complications, Oxford hip scores or visual analogue scale scores for state of health. Conclusions Delaying surgery for patients eligible for total hip arthroplasty as per the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines is justified and should not incur loss of the best practice tariff.

Neuraxial anaesthesia is associated with improved outcomes and reduced postoperative complications in patients undergoing aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002097574
Author(s):  
Chapman Wei ◽  
Alex Gu ◽  
Arun Muthiah ◽  
Safa C Fassihi ◽  
Peter K Sculco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Neuraxial Anaesthesia ◽  
Extended Length

Background: As the incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to increase, revision THA (rTHA) is becoming an increasingly common procedure. rTHA is widely regarded as a more challenging procedure, with higher complication rates and increased medical, social and economic burdens when compared to its primary counterpart. Given the complexity of rTHA and the projected increase in incidence of these procedures, patient optimisation is becoming of interest to improve outcomes. Anaesthetic choice has been extensively studied in primary THA as a modifiable risk factor for postoperative outcomes, showing favourable results for neuraxial anaesthesia compared to general anaesthesia. The impact of anaesthetic choice in rTHA has not been studied previously. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients who underwent rTHA between 2014 and 2017 were divided into 3 anaesthesia cohorts: general anaesthesia, neuraxial anaesthesia, and combined general-regional (neuraxial and/or peripheral nerve block) anaesthesia. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyse patient characteristics and 30-day postoperative outcomes. Bonferroni correction was applied for post-hoc analysis. Results: In total, 5759 patients were identified. Of these, 3551 (61.7%) patients underwent general anaesthesia, 1513 (26.3%) patients underwent neuraxial anaesthesia, and 695 (12.1%) patients underwent combined general-regional anaesthesia. On multivariate analysis, neuraxial anaesthesia was associated with decreased odds for any-one complication (OR 0.635; p  < 0.001), perioperative blood transfusion (OR 0.641; p  < 0.001), and extended length of stay (OR 0.005; p = 0.005) compared to general anaesthesia. Conclusions: Relative to those receiving general anaesthesia, patients undergoing neuraxial anaesthesia are at decreased risk for postoperative complications, perioperative blood transfusions, and extended length of stay. Prospective controlled trials should be conducted to verify these findings.

The Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Fractured Neck of Femur in Octogenarians

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will K.M. Kieffer ◽  
Edward J.C. Dawe ◽  
Edward A.O. Lindisfarne ◽  
Benedict A. Rogers ◽  
Stephen Nicol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Total Hip

Are adverse outcome rates higher in multiple sclerosis patients after total hip arthroplasty?

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (7) ◽  
pp. 875-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Newman ◽  
A. Khlopas ◽  
N. Sodhi ◽  
G. L. Curtis ◽  
A. A. Sultan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Implant Survivorship ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients

AimsThis study compared multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a matched cohort. Specifically, we evaluated: 1) implant survivorship; 2) functional outcomes (modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), and modified Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (mMSIS) scores (with the MS cohort also evaluated based on the disease phenotype)); 3) physical therapy duration and return to function; 4) radiographic outcomes; and 5) complications.Patients and MethodsWe reviewed our institution’s database to identify MS patients who underwent THA between January 2008 and June 2016. A total of 34 MS patients (41 hips) were matched in a 1:2 ratio to a cohort of THA patients who did not have MS, based on age, body mass index (BMI), and Charlson/Deyo score. Patient records were reviewed for complications, and their functional outcomes and radiographs were reviewed at their most recent follow-up.ResultsCompared with the matched cohort, MS patients had lower all-cause implant survivorship at eight years (91.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.7 to 100) vs 98.7% (95% CI 96.2 to 100)) (p = 0.033), lower mHHS scores (66 vs 80, p < 0.001), and HOOS JR scores (79 vs 88, p = 0.009). Multiple sclerosis patients also required more physiotherapy (five weeks vs three weeks, p = 0.002) and took longer to return to baseline (seven weeks vs five weeks, p = 0.010) than the matched cohort. Furthermore, MS patients had more complications than the non-MS patients (six vs zero, p < 0.001). The worse outcomes of the MS group can potentially be explained by predisposition of these patients to mechanical complications and progression of their disease during the period of this study, as demonstrated by worsening of the mMSIS scores (2.9 vs 3.4; p = 0.008).ConclusionMS patients had lower implant survivorship, lower functional outcome scores, and increased complication rates; in addition, MS patients took longer to return to their baseline functional level after THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:875–81.

scholarly journals A Modified Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.S. Pai
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Direct Lateral Approach

A modified lateral approach of Hardinge allows adequate access for orientation of the implant was described. Although this approach is more difficult than the posterior approach, there is a learning curve, when mastered, it'll definitely reduce the incidence of dislocation. In the Author's opinion, this approach should be used routinely for total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur where the incidence of dislocation is unacceptably high using the posterior approach.

Müller straight stem total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur

Injury ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 727-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpit K. Patel ◽  
Robert U. Ashford ◽  
Antonio Frasquet-Garcia ◽  
Catherine Booth ◽  
Stephen R. Joseph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Straight Stem

Practice variation in total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for treatment of fractured neck of femur in Australia

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (1) ◽  
pp. 92-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. A. Harris ◽  
A. Cuthbert ◽  
R. de Steiger ◽  
P. Lewis ◽  
S. E. Graves
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Practice Variation ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Relative Indication ◽  
Day Of The Week

Aims Displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) may be treated with partial (hemiarthroplasty, HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA), with recent recommendations advising that THA be used in community-ambulant patients. This study aims to determine the association between the proportion of FNF treated with THA and year of surgery, day of the week, surgeon practice, and private versus public hospitals, adjusting for known confounders. Patients and Methods Data from 67 620 patients in the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) from 1999 to 2016 inclusive were used to generate unadjusted and adjusted analyses of the associations between patient, time, surgeon and institution factors, and the proportion of FNF treated with THA. Results Overall, THA was used in 23.7% of patients. THA was more frequently used over time, in younger patients, in healthier patients, in cases performed on weekdays (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.41), in private hospitals (adjusted OR 4.34; 95% CI 3.94 to 4.79) and by surgeons whose hip arthroplasty practice has a relatively higher proportion of elective patients (adjusted OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.49 to 1.83). Conclusion Practice variation exists in the proportion of FNF patients treated with THA due to variables other than patient factors. This may reflect variation in resources available and surgeon preference, and uncertainty regarding the relative indication.

Clinical Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Fractured Neck of Femur in Patients Over 75 Years

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Travis ◽  
Ruth S. Tan ◽  
Penisimani Funaki ◽  
Steve J. McChesney ◽  
Sandeep C. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Total Hip

Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6) ◽  
pp. 1009-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Ng ◽  
Paul Gaston ◽  
Philip M. Simpson ◽  
Gavin J. Macpherson ◽  
James T. Patton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Hip

Aims The aims of this systematic review were to assess the learning curve of semi-active robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), and to compare the accuracy, patient-reported functional outcomes, complications, and survivorship between rTHA and manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA). Methods Searches of PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar were performed in April 2020 in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Search terms included “robotic”, “hip”, and “arthroplasty”. The criteria for inclusion were published clinical research articles reporting the learning curve for rTHA (robotic arm-assisted only) and those comparing the implantation accuracy, functional outcomes, survivorship, or complications with mTHA. Results There were 501 articles initially identified from databases and references. Following full text screening, 17 articles that satisfied the inclusion criteria were included. Four studies reported the learning curve of rTHA, 13 studies reported on implant positioning, five on functional outcomes, ten on complications, and four on survivorship. The meta-analysis showed a significantly greater number of cases of acetabular component placement in the safe zone compared with the mTHA group (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.10 to 7.94; p < 0.001) and that rTHA resulted in a significantly better Harris Hip Score compared to mTHA in the short- to mid-term follow-up (95% CI 0.46 to 5.64; p = 0.020). However, there was no difference in infection rates, dislocation rates, overall complication rates, and survival rates at short-term follow-up. Conclusion The learning curve of rTHA was between 12 and 35 cases, which was dependent on the assessment goal, such as operating time, accuracy, and team working. Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty was associated with improved accuracy of component positioning and functional outcome, however no difference in complication rates or survival were observed at short- to mid-term follow-up. Overall, there remains an absence of high-quality level I evidence and cost analysis comparing rTHA and mTHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1009–1020.

scholarly journals Initiating Physical Therapy on the Day of Surgery Decreases Length of Stay Without Compromising Functional Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Juliano ◽  
Danielle Edwards ◽  
Daniel Spinello ◽  
Yolanda Capizzano ◽  
Emie Epelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Total Hip

scholarly journals Hemiarthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty in fractured neck of femur: a shift in national practice?

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-92
Author(s):  
AM Khan ◽  
M Rafferty ◽  
JS Daurka
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Joint Registry ◽  
Hip Arthroplasties ◽  
National Practice

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the trends in national practice regarding total hip arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty in fractured neck of femur between 2010 and 2016. Materials and methods A retrospective review was conducted of NHS Digital data (England) between 2010 and 2016. ‘Emergency’ neck of femur fracture admissions, hemiarthroplasties and total hip arthroplasties were included. Elective total hip arthroplasties, revisions and prostheses relocations were excluded. Annual percentages for each operation were calculated. Trends were tabulated and displayed graphically for analysis. Results The total number of emergency neck of femur diagnoses was 257,789. Total hip arthroplasty was performed in 2217, 2737, 3305, 3686, 3670 and 3825 patients and hemiarthroplasty was performed in 21,335, 21,744, 21,115, 21,798, 21,804 and 22,163 patients for each year between 2011 and 2016, respectively. The rate of change for total hip arthroplasty slowed from 24.54% increase/year (2011–2013) to 5.24% increase/year (2013–2016). Uncemented arthroplasties decreased over the same time period. Discussion Increasing numbers of total hip arthroplasties are conducted for hip fractures; however, this trend has slowed since 2013. Possible explanations include all eligible fractures being treated with total hip arthroplasty, trauma surgeon preference for hemiarthroplasty due to lower surgical specialism or publication of individual surgeon data (National Joint Registry) which may lead to surgeons favouring hemiarthroplasties which have a lower complication rate compared to elective total hip arthroplasties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document