scholarly journals Randomised controlled study to compare radiofrequency ablation with minimally invasive ultrasound-guided non-flush ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein in the treatment of varicose veins

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (7) ◽  
pp. 525-531
Author(s):  
PA Sandhya ◽  
RS Mohil ◽  
R Sricharan
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Invasive therapeutic options in truncal varicosity of the great saphenous vein

VASA ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hach-Wunderle ◽  
Hach
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
High Ligation ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Disease Stages

It is known from current pathophysiology that disease stages I and II of truncal varicosity of the great saphenous vein do not cause changes in venous pressure on dynamic phlebodynamometry. This is possibly also the case for mild cases of the disease in stage III. In pronounced cases of stage III and all cases of stage IV, however, venous hypertension occurs which triggers the symptoms of secondary deep venous insufficiency and all the complications of chronic venous insufficiency. From these facts the therapeutic consequence is inferred that in stages I and II and perhaps also in very mild cases of stage III disease, it is enough "merely" to remove varicose veins without expecting there to be any other serious complications in the patient’s further life caused by the varicosity. Recurrence rates are not included in this analysis. In marked cases of disease stages III and IV of the great saphenous vein, however, secondary deep venous insufficiency is to be expected sooner or later. The classical operation with saphenofemoral high ligation ("crossectomy") and stripping strictly adheres to the recognized pathophysiologic principles. It also takes into account in the greatest detail aspects of minimally invasive surgery and esthetics. In the past few years, developments have been advanced to further minimize surgical trauma and to replace the stripping maneuver using occlusion of the trunk vein which is left in place. Obliteration of the vessel is subsequently performed via transmission of energy through an inserted catheter. This includes the techniques of radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser treatment. High ligation is not performed as a matter of principle. In a similar way, sclerotherapy using microfoam is minimally invasive in character. All these procedures may be indicated for disease stages I and II, and with reservations also in mild forms of stage III disease. Perhaps high ligation previously constituted overtreatment in some cases. Targeted studies are still needed to prove whether secondary deep venous insufficiency can be avoided in advanced stages of varicose vein disease without high ligation and thus without exclusion of the whole recirculation circuit.

Prospective five-year study of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Chapman-Smith ◽  
A Browne
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Patient Acceptance ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Clinical Recurrence ◽  
Over Time

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy, safety and rate of recurrence for varicose veins associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux treated with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS). Methods A five-year prospective study was performed, recording the effect on the GSV and saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) diameters, and reflux in the superficial venous system over time. UGFS was the sole treatment modality used in all cases, and repeat UGFS was performed where indicated following serial annual ultrasound. Results No serious adverse outcomes were observed – specifically no thromboembolism, arterial injection, anaphylaxis or nerve damage. There was a 4% clinical recurrence rate after five years, with 100% patient acceptance of success. Serial annual duplex ultrasound demonstrated a significant reduction in GSV and SFJ diameters, maintained over time. There was ultrasound recurrence in 27% at 12 months, and in 64% at five years, including any incompetent trunkal or tributary reflux even 1 mm in diameter being recorded. Thirty percent had pure ultrasound recurrence, 17% new vessel reflux and 17% combined new and recurrent vessels on ultrasound. Of all, 16.5% required repeat UGFS treatment between 12 and 24 months, but less than 10% in subsequent years. The safety and clinical efficacy of UGFS for all clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological elements classes of GSV reflux was excellent. Conclusion The popularity of this outpatient technique with patients reflects ease of treatment, lower cost, lack of downtime and elimination of venous signs and symptoms. Patients accept that UGFS can be repeated readily if required for recurrence in this common chronic condition. The subclinical ultrasound evidence of recanalization or new vein incompetence needs to be considered in this light.

Comparison of cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of varicose veins

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary K Yang ◽  
Marina Parapini ◽  
Joel Gagnon ◽  
Jerry C Chen
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Vancouver General Hospital ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Success Rates

Objective To review clinical outcomes of varicose vein patients treated with cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation at our institution. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation during a three-year period. Patient records were reviewed to assess demographics, location and severity of disease, treatment details and outcome at short- and mid-term follow-ups. Outcome parameters included treatment success and complications. Results Between January 2014 and December 2016, 335 patients with 476 veins were treated with either cyanoacrylate embolization (n = 148) or radiofrequency ablation (n = 328) at the Vancouver General Hospital Vascular Surgery Vein Clinic. The average age of patients were 57 ± 1 years with the majority being female (78%) and an average BMI of 24.8 ± 0.5. CEAP classes were 2 (49%), 3 (26%), 4a (22%) and >4b (3%). Of the veins treated with cyanoacrylate embolization, the vein types were as follows: 76% were great saphenous vein, 16% were small saphenous vein, 5% were anterior accessory great saphenous vein and 1.4% were perforator veins. The vein types for radiofrequency ablation were 88%, 9%, 3% and 0%, respectively. The average amount of cyanoacrylate embolization delivered for great saphenous vein treatment was 1.8 ± 0.1 ml with a treatment length of 43 ± 1 cm. Subgroup comparison was done for great saphenous vein segments. Treatment success was 100% in cyanoacrylate embolization and 99% in radiofrequency ablation. Superficial phlebitis was the most common complication noted at mid-term follow-up in 5% of cyanoacrylate embolization and 16% of radiofrequency ablation treatments (P < 0.05). One patient in each group had asymptomatic proximal thrombus extension treated with anticoagulation for 2–3 weeks. Three superficial infections from glue clumps were noted in the cyanoacrylate embolization group requiring excision and drainage. Five patients in the radiofrequency ablation group had persistent numbness and one wound complications at the access site. Conclusion Cyanoacrylate embolization offers equivalent success rates with lower mid-term complication rates as radiofrequency ablation.

Endoluminal thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency

Phlebologie ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (06) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Zollmann ◽  
P. Zollmann ◽  
J. Veltman ◽  
A. Gräser ◽  
I. Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Treatment Technique ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Previously Treated

SummaryTo evaluate and compare the fiveyear outcome after treatment of a varicose GSV by endovenous thermal laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).In this non-randomized, prospective study, patients treated in 2007 and 2008 for complete varicosis of the GSV (CEAP: C2–C6) were divided according to the treatment technique used into three groups: RFA (VNUS ClosureFast™), EVLA 980 nm (ELVeS 980™) and EVLA 1470 nm (ELVeS 1470™). Ultrasound-guided follow-up consultations were conducted 3 days, 3 months, 1 year and 5 years after treatment.589 patients with 643 GSVs (223 RFA, 185 EVLA 980, 235 EVLA 1470) were treated under tumescent local anaesthesia. No major complications occurred and minor complications were rare (4.7–12.2 %, p=0.135).66 % (RFA), 15 % (EVLA 980) and 32 % (EVLA 1470) of the patients were pain-free without post-operative analgesics. After 5 years, 86 % (RFA), 90 % (EVLA 980) and 93 % (EVLA 1470) of the veins were occluded (p=0.096). Ultrasound imaging revealed reflux in treated GSVs in 5–8 % of cases (p=0.73). A second ablation of the previously treated GSV was required in 5 % (RFA), 2 % (EVLA 980) and 2 % (EVLA 1470) of the patients (p=0.28).Endoluminal thermal ablation is an easy, safe and well tolerated method for the treatment of varicosis. Radiofrequency ablation is less painful than EVLA. RFA and EVLA 1470 are equally effective for vein closure.

scholarly journals Modification of Primary Avalvular Varicose Anomaly after endovenous radiofrequency ablation

Phlebologie ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (06) ◽  
pp. 373-376
Author(s):  
Daniele Bissacco ◽  
Silvia Stegher ◽  
Fabio Massimo Calliari ◽  
Marco Piercarlo Viani
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Primary Varicose Veins ◽  
Partial Thrombosis

AbstractPrimary avalvular varicose anomaly (PAVA) is a new medical concept defined as primary varicose veins resembling neovascularized tissue on ultrasound examination. PAVAs could be misdiagnosed as recurrence at the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction, but no studies have yet examined their role before and after venous invasive procedure. In this report, we describe a case of PAVA in a 39-year-old man with symptomatic varicose veins and great saphenous vein truncal incompetence. Six months after radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein, duplex ultrasound revealed complete occlusion of great saphenous vein and partial thrombosis of the still incompetent PAVA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document