scholarly journals Specialty Pharmacy Services: Preparing for a New Era in Health-System Pharmacy

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 834-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blake Shay ◽  
Les Louden ◽  
Bonnie Kirschenbaum
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 815-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Autumn Bagwell ◽  
Tara Kelley ◽  
Alicia Carver ◽  
Jennifer B. Lee ◽  
Brandon Newman

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 40-40
Author(s):  
Vincent Tao ◽  
Talia Papiro ◽  
Martha Stutsky ◽  
Mitchell DelVecchio ◽  
Sarah A. Kelly

Author(s):  
Lauren Roder ◽  
Michelle Simonsen ◽  
Lindsey Fitzpatrick ◽  
Jennifer Loucks ◽  
Jianghua He

The approval of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) expanded highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor modulator therapy to approximately 90% of persons age 12 and older with cystic fibrosis. Clinical pharmacists and pharmacy technicians played a key role in planning for ELX/TEZ/IVA initiation prior to FDA approval as well as initiating therapy after approval. This study evaluates the impact of pharmacy services on time to ELX/TEZ/IVA initiation. A retrospective chart review evaluated patients qualifying for ELX/TEZ/IVA at a single health system between October 21, 2019 and April 1, 2020. Patients filling ELX/TEZ/IVA at an integrated health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) versus an outside specialty pharmacy (SP) started on therapy an average of 10.8 days faster (10.8 days ± 14.0 vs 21.6 days ± 18.8 respectively; p=0.006). More patients filling at a HSSP received ELX/TEZ/IVA within 14 days of the prescription being written compared to outside SPs (82.0% vs 41.4% respectively; p=0.001). Pre-ELX/TEZ/IVA initiation, patients were hospitalized for a CF related complication for an average of 6.26 days (range 0-183) compared to 1.16 days (range 0-91) post-ELX/TEZ/IVA initiation. Lastly, an estimated $134,810 was saved in the 105 patients that were able to fill ELX/TEZ/IVA at a HSSP by initiating drug an average of 10.8 days quicker than outside SPs. The results of this study demonstrate the value of an integrated HSSP model. Further advocacy for inclusion of integrated HSSPs by pharmacy benefit managers is needed to optimize medication access, control costs, and improve patient outcomes for patients receiving care within a health system.


Author(s):  
Rebekah H Anguiano ◽  
Autumn D Zuckerman ◽  
Elizabeth Hall ◽  
Erica Diamantides ◽  
Lisa Kumor ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study is to obtain insight into providers’ satisfaction with services offered by health-system integrated specialty pharmacies and to determine whether providers’ perceptions of services offered under an integrated model differ from perceptions of external specialty pharmacy services. Methods A multi-site, cross-sectional, online survey of specialty clinic healthcare providers at 10 academic health systems with integrated specialty pharmacies was conducted. The questionnaire was developed by members of the Vizient Specialty Pharmacy Outcomes and Benchmarking Workgroup and was pretested at 3 pilot sites prior to dissemination. Prescribers of specialty medications within each institution were identified and sent an email invitation to participate in the study that included a link to the anonymous questionnaire. Respondents were asked to rate their agreement with 10 statements regarding quality of services of integrated and external specialty pharmacies on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). An analysis to determine differences in providers’ overall satisfaction with the integrated and external specialty pharmacy practice models, as well as differences in satisfaction scores for each of the 10 statements, was performed using paired-samples t tests. Results The mean (SD) score for overall satisfaction with integrated specialty pharmacies was significantly higher than the score for satisfaction with external specialty pharmacies: 4.72 (0.58) vs 2.97 (1.20); 95% confidence interval, 1.64-1.87; P < 0.001. Provider ratings of the integrated specialty pharmacy model were also higher for all 10 items evaluating the quality of services (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion The study results confirm that the health-system integrated specialty pharmacy practice model promotes high rates of provider satisfaction with services and perceived benefits.


Author(s):  
Ryan J Hannan ◽  
Margaret K Lundholm ◽  
Dennis Brierton ◽  
Noelle R M Chapman

Abstract Purpose To describe how health systems may respond to sudden changes in operations by leveraging existing resources and to share one organization’s experience responding to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Summary In a health system based in Illinois and Wisconsin, pharmacy services are provided by a single, integrated department responsible for all aspects of pharmaceutical care within the organization. Hospital, retail, ambulatory care, and population health services are all managed under one leadership team. All pertinent ancillary services are also managed within the department, including informatics, supply chain, and drug policy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the pharmacy services leadership has successfully managed volume and capacity challenges by redirecting resources to where they are needed. A disaster response framework based on Federal Emergency Management Agency guidance was put in place, and change management principles were used to rapidly operationalize change. Components of the nimble response have included quickly increasing capacity, thoughtful and timely communication to all team members, strategic decision making with available data, creating an agile pool of labor, and maintaining an efficient system supply chain. Well-being and resilience are emphasized alongside reflection on lessons learned. Some changes made in the urgent response to the pandemic are being considered for long-term implementation. Conclusion Organizations have the potential to respond to almost any situation if they are integrated and teams work together to build flexibility. The keys to success are thoughtful maximization of existing resources and strong communication.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (14) ◽  
pp. 1118-1127
Author(s):  
Colleen C McCabe ◽  
Meagan S Barbee ◽  
Marley L Watson ◽  
Alyssa Billmeyer ◽  
Collin E Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The primary objective of the study described here was to compare rates of patient adherence to anticancer medications filled at an internal health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) vs external specialty pharmacies. The primary outcome was the medication possession ratio (MPR), and the secondary outcomes included proportion of days covered (PDC), and time to treatment (TTT). Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted to compare the MPR, PDC, and TTT for patients who received oral anticancer therapy using prescriptions claim data. A t test or Wilcoxon test was used to explore the effect of demographic and other factors on adherence and TTT. A multiple regression model with backward elimination was used to analyze significant factors to identify covariates significantly associated with the outcomes. Results Of the 300 patients screened for study inclusion, 204 patients whose records had complete MPR and PDC data and 164 whose records had TTT data were included in the analysis. There were significant between-group differences in mean MPR and mean PDC with patient use of the HSSP vs external pharmacies (1.00 vs 0.75 [P < 0.001] and 0.95 vs 0.7 [P < 0.001], respectively). Pharmacy type (P = 0.024) and tumor type (P = 0.048) were significantly associated with TTT. Conclusion The multiple regression analysis indicated that oncology patients who filled their anticancer medication precriptions at an internal HSSP at an academic medical center had significantly higher adherence, as measured by MPR and PDC, and quicker TTT than those who filled their prescriptions at an external specialty pharmacy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-174
Author(s):  
Brian L. Erstad ◽  
Tina Aramaki ◽  
Kurt Weibel

Objective: To provide lessons learned for colleges of pharmacy and large health systems that are contemplating or in the process of undergoing integration. Method: This report describes the merger of an academic medical center and large health system with a focus on the implications of the merger for pharmacy from the perspectives of both a college of pharmacy and a health system’s pharmacy services. Results: Overarching pharmacy issues to consider include having an administrator from the college of pharmacy directly involved in the merger negotiation discussions, having at least one high-level administrator from the college of pharmacy and one high-level pharmacy administrator from the health system involved in ongoing discussions about implications of the merger and changes that are likely to affect teaching, research, and clinical service activities, having focused discussions between college and health system pharmacy administrators on the implications of the merger on experiential and research-related activities, and anticipating concerns by clinical faculty members affected by the merger. Conclusion: The integration of a college of pharmacy and a large health system during the acquisition of an academic medical center can be challenging for both organizations, but appropriate pre- and post-merger discussions between college and health system pharmacy administrators that include a strategic planning component can assuage concerns and problems that are likely to arise, increasing the likelihood of a mutually beneficial collaboration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document