scholarly journals Inter-Rater Reliability and Intra-Rater Reliability Testing of My Jump 2 Mobile Application in Measuring Countermovement Jump

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1319-1323
Author(s):  
Muhammad Faiz Alias ◽  
Hosni Hasan ◽  
Mohd Syafiq Miswan ◽  
Daniyal Donny Man
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 527-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonel A. do Nascimento ◽  
Ligia F. Fonseca ◽  
Claudia B. dos Santos

Author(s):  
Tomas Gallego-Izquierdo ◽  
Enrique Arroba-Díaz ◽  
Gema García-Ascoz ◽  
María del Alba Val-Cano ◽  
Daniel Pecos-Martin ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the mobile application forward head posture in terms of validity, inter- and intra-rater reliability, minimum detectable change, sensitivity, and specificity to measure craniovertebral angle. In total, 44 subjects (mean age 23.30 ± 4.44 years) were evaluated in the standing position with markers on the tragus and cutaneous prominence of seventh cervical vertebra (C7). We had two experienced and trained physiotherapists assess cervical posture using the mobile application forward head posture and photogrammetry. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to determine validity and reliability. A contingency table was made to determine sensitivity and specificity. Intra-rater reliability of the mobile application forward head posture had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88. The inter-rater reliability generated an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 to 0.89. Criterion validity data were above 0.82. The minimum detectable change was 4.96° for intra-rater and 5.52° for inter-rater reliability. The smartphone application exhibited 94.4% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity. The smartphone application forward head posture is a valid and reliable tool to measure craniovertebral angle in a standing position and, therefore, could be a useful assessment tool in clinical practice.


2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. S190-S207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. Saelens ◽  
Lawrence D. Frank ◽  
Christopher Auffrey ◽  
Robert C. Whitaker ◽  
Hillary L. Burdette ◽  
...  

Background:Reliable and comprehensive measurement of physical activity settings is needed to examine environment-behavior relations.Methods:Surveyed park professionals (n = 34) and users (n = 29) identified park and playground elements (e.g., trail) and qualities (e.g., condition). Responses guided observational instrument development for environmental assessment of public recreation spaces (EAPRS). Item inter-rater reliability was evaluated following observations in 92 parks and playgrounds. Instrument revision and further reliability testing were conducted with observations in 21 parks and 20 playgrounds.Results:EAPRS evaluates trail/path, specific use (e.g., picnic), water-related, amenity (e.g., benches), and play elements, and their qualities. Most EAPRS items had good-excellent reliability, particularly presence/number items. Reliability improved from the original (n = 1088 items) to revised (n = 646 items) instrument for condition, coverage/shade, and openness/visibility items. Reliability was especially good for play features, but cleanliness items were generally unreliable.Conclusions:The EAPRS instrument provides comprehensive assessment of parks’ and playgrounds’ physical environment, with generally high reliability.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1139-1143
Author(s):  
Yazeed Al-shawi ◽  
Tamer Mesallam ◽  
Nouf Albakheet ◽  
Moath Alshawi ◽  
Rayan Alfallaj ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
James Maryman ◽  
Staci H. Sullivan ◽  
Julie V. Duet ◽  
Suzette G. Fontenot ◽  
Mary Johnson ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred Gatt ◽  
Nachiappan Chockalingam

Background: The assessment of the maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle is an important clinical examination procedure. Evidence shows that the traditional goniometer is highly unreliable, and various designs of goniometers to measure the maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle rely on the application of a known force to obtain reliable results. Hence, an innovative ankle dorsiflexion measurement device was designed to make this measurement more reliable by holding the foot in a selected posture without the application of a known moment. Objectives: To report on the comprehensive validity and reliability testing carried out on the new device. Methods: Following validity testing, four different trials to test reliability of the ankle dorsiflexion measurement device were performed. These trials included inter-rater and intra-rater testings with a controlled moment, intra-rater reliability testing with knees flexed and extended without a controlled moment, intra-rater testing with a patient population, and inter-rater reliability testing between four raters of varying experience without controlling moment. All raters were blinded. Study Design: A series of trials to test intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities. Results: Intra-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.98 and inter-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) was 0.953 with a controlled moment. With uncontrolled moment, very high reliability for intra-tester was also achieved (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94 with knees extended and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95 with knees flexed). For the trial investigating test–retest reliability with actual patients, intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 was obtained. In the trial investigating four different raters with uncontrolled moment, intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.91 was achieved. Conclusions: The new ankle dorsiflexion measurement device is a valid and reliable device for measuring ankle dorsiflexion in both healthy subjects and patients, with both controlled and uncontrolled moments, even by multiple raters of varying experience when the foot is dorsiflexed to its end of range of motion. Clinical relevance An ankle dorsiflexion measuring device has been designed to increase the reliability of ankle dorsiflexion measurement and replace the traditional goniometer. While the majority of similar devices rely on application of a known moment to perform this measurement, it has been shown that this is not required with the new ankle dorsiflexion measurement device and, rather, foot posture should be taken into consideration as this affects the maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document