Health care governance, user involvement and medical regulation in Europe

Author(s):  
Mike Dent

This chapter reviews recent developments in user involvement practices across a range of European health care systems in terms of their implications for the medical profession and regulation of its practitioners. It will review the dominant models of user involvement, from Arnstein (1969) ‘ladder of participation’ onwards within Europe. The chapter will be particularly concerned with the growing linkages between user involvement in its various guises and the governance and regulation of European health care and medicine. The analysis will critically examine the variations in user involvement from ‘choice’ to ‘co-production’ and the range of ways they have been implemented in various European countries, with particular attention to England, Italy and Denmark. The discussion will focus on the implications for the medical profession as much as for the patients themselves.

2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. van den Brink-Muinen ◽  
P.F.M. Verhaak ◽  
J.M. Bensing ◽  
O. Bahrs ◽  
M. Deveugele ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 1137-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Garattini ◽  
Vittorio Bertele’ ◽  
Brian Godman ◽  
Alan Haycox ◽  
Björn Wettermark ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Pammolli ◽  
Massimo Riccaboni ◽  
Laura Magazzini

1994 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Saltman

The issue of patient choice presents a complicated challenge to publicly operated health systems. Increased patient choice can strengthen the citizen's commitment to traditional welfare state objectives, or alternatively, it can severely damage that commitment, depending upon the design of the choice mechanism and the structural context within which patient choice occurs. For patient choice to be linked to true empowerment, choice must reinforce rather than undercut the accountability of health care providers to the population they serve. This article explores the basic issues involved in empowering patients within publicly operated health systems. The author first reviews the conceptual components that could or should be incorporated within the notion of empowered patients, then examines what would be required to actually empower patients within health systems, defined in terms of expanding not only logistical choice but also clinical influence and decision-making participation. The article concludes with a wide-ranging analysis of the impact of potential policies and mechanisms on the long-term objectives of achieving democratically accountable health care systems.


1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Elola

The problems within the health care systems of western European countries, and their current attempts at reform, can be analyzed by comparing those countries having national health service (NHS) systems with those having social security systems. There are important differences in the structures, processes, and outcomes of these two types of health care systems, and thus in the problems they face. Greater cost control, equity, and, possibly, efficiency in improving the population's health are the advantages of NHS systems; however, public satisfaction is lower than in social security systems. Attempts to overcome this trade-off between the outcomes of the two types of health care systems are the main goal of the reforms. To achieve this goal, there has been a trend toward convergence of NHS and social security systems. For the NHS systems of Latin-rim countries, however, which have received less political commitment and public support than those elsewhere, this means a return to the former social security systems—a trend that may reintroduce the problems associated with these types of systems but without any evidence that public satisfaction will increase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document