Implementation of preventive mental health services for children of physically ill parents: experiences in seven European countries and health care systems

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Kühne ◽  
Miriam Haagen ◽  
Christiane Baldus ◽  
Stavroula Diareme ◽  
Andrea Grether ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Lauritzen

This article addresses the issue of parental mental illness. The theoretical background and rationale for developing new routines to change clinical practice is described, suggesting a policy change in which a child focus is implemented in adult mental health services. Furthermore, proposed strategies that have the potential of being effective within existing health care systems are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradford L Felker ◽  
Meghan M McGinn ◽  
Erika M Shearer ◽  
Gina T Raza ◽  
Sari D Gold ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Telemental Health (TMH) is an effective way to increase access to mental health services. For this reason, many health care systems strive to make TMH a part of routine mental health services. TMH use has increased substantially in recent years; however, health care systems have found it challenging to implement TMH ubiquitously. Minimal literature addresses system wide TMH implementation efforts. Because previous local training efforts failed in leading to meaningful uptake in TMH use, a quality improvement project guided by implementation science methodology was used to design and implement an innovative TMH training program across a large service line. Methods PARiHS criteria (i.e., Evidence, Context, Facilitation) was used as a framework to design, communicate, and implement a TMH training program aimed at providing task-specific training and culture change. The Evidence included incorporating established telehealth literature on TMH acceptance and efficacy. The Context included leadership support to prioritize training sites. RE-AIM guided the evaluation outcome measures used. The Facilitation was guided by Implementation/Facilitation techniques. A total of 100 interdisciplinary mental health providers from outpatient mental health clinics participated in this training over the course of two years. Results Overall, providers reported satisfaction with the training program, and found that it increased their TMH knowledge and competence. The number of providers using TMH and patients who received it nearly doubled in the two years after the launch of the TMH training compared to the two years preceding. Conclusions Implementation science methodology was important in creating an organizational framework to design, evaluate, and facilitate implementation of an innovative TMH training program. The program was well-received by staff and increased the number of providers and patients using TMH. Since this project was completed, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased the demand for telehealth services. This training model offers specific strategies based upon implementation science that could be disseminated to and adopted by mental health programs looking to implement system wide TMH use.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradford Felker ◽  
Meghan M McGinn ◽  
Erika M Shearer ◽  
Gina T Raza ◽  
Sari D Gold ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Telemental Health (TMH) is an effective way to increase access to mental health services. For this reason, many health care systems strive to make TMH a part of routine mental health services. TMH use has increased substantially in recent years; however, health care systems have found it challenging to implement TMH ubiquitously. Minimal literature addresses system wide TMH implementation efforts. To broadly expand TMH throughout a VA medical center’s mental health service, a quality improvement project was conducted to develop and implement a comprehensive, novel TMH training program for staff. Methods: This quality improvement project was informed by implementation science methodologies. PARiHS criteria and Evidence-Based QI Implementation/Facilitation guided the development and implementation of this TMH training program, which included: (a) two online TMH courses, (b) a one-day didactic training including hands-on practice and skills evaluation, and (c) weekly calls where staff could receive TMH consultation. A total of 100 interdisciplinary mental health providers from outpatient mental health clinics participated in this training over the course of two years. RE-AIM criteria were used to evaluate the effectiveness of this training program. Results: Overall, providers reported satisfaction with this TMH training program, and found that it increased their TMH knowledge and competence. The number of providers using TMH and patients who received it nearly doubled in the two years after the launch of the TMH training compared to the two years preceding. Conclusions: This novel TMH training program was well-received by staff and increased the number of providers and patients using TMH. Since this project was completed, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased the demand for telehealth services. This training model offers specific strategies based upon implementation science that could be disseminated to and adopted by mental health programs looking to implement system wide TMH use.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1127-1133
Author(s):  
Pierre-André Michaud ◽  
Annemieke Visser ◽  
Johanna P M Vervoort ◽  
Paul Kocken ◽  
Sijmen A Reijneveld ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mental health problems in adolescence can profoundly jeopardize adolescent current and future health and functioning. We aimed to describe existing recommendations and services regarding the delivery of primary mental health care for adolescents in 31 European countries. Methods Data on the availability and accessibility of primary mental health services were collected, as part of the Horizon 2020-funded project Models of Child Health Appraised. One expert from each country answered a closed items questionnaire during years 2017–18. Results All 31 participating countries had some policy or recommendations regarding the availability and accessibility of primary mental health services for adolescents, but their focus and implementation varied largely between and within countries. Only half of the participating countries had recommendations on screening adolescents for mental health issues and burdens. Merely a quarter of the countries had ambulatory facilities targeting specifically adolescents throughout the whole country. Just over half had some kind of suicide prevention programs. Same-day access to primary care in case of -health emergencies was possible in 21 countries, but often not throughout the whole country. Nineteen countries had strategies securing accessible mental health care for vulnerable adolescents. Conclusions Overall, around half of European countries had strategies securing access to various primary mental health care for adolescents. They frequently did not guarantee care over the whole country and often tackled a limited number of situations. EU countries should widen the range of policies and recommendations governing the delivery of mental health care to adolescents and monitor their implementation.


Author(s):  
G. Cetrano ◽  
L. Salvador-Carulla ◽  
F. Tedeschi ◽  
L. Rabbi ◽  
M. R. Gutiérrez-Colosía ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Although many mental health care systems provide care interventions that are not related to direct health care, little is known about the interfaces between the latter and core health care. ‘Core health care’ refers to services whose explicit aim is direct clinical treatment which is usually provided by health professionals, i.e., physicians, nurses, psychologists. ‘Other care’ is typically provided by other staff and includes accommodation, training, promotion of independence, employment support and social skills. In such a definition, ‘other care’ does not necessarily mean being funded or governed differently. The aims of the study were: (1) using a standard classification system (Description and Evaluation of Services and Directories in Europe for Long Term Care, DESDE-LTC) to identify ‘core health’ and ‘other care’ services provided to adults with mental health problems; and (2) to investigate the balance of care by analysing the types and characteristics of core health and other care services. Methods The study was conducted in eight selected local areas in eight European countries with different mental health systems. All publicly funded mental health services, regardless of the funding agency, for people over 18 years old were identified and coded. The availability, capacity and the workforce of the local mental health services were described using their functional main activity or ‘Main Types of Care’ (MTC) as the standard for international comparison, following the DESDE-LTC system. Results In these European study areas, 822 MTCs were identified as providing core health care and 448 provided other types of care. Even though one-third of mental health services in the selected study areas provided interventions that were coded as ‘other care’, significant variation was found in the typology and characteristics of these services across the eight study areas. Conclusions The functional distinction between core health and other care overcomes the traditional division between ‘health’ and ‘social’ sectors based on governance and funding. The overall balance between core health and other care services varied significantly across the European sites. Mental health systems cannot be understood or planned without taking into account the availability and capacity of all services specifically available for this target population, including those outside the health sector.


1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (S1) ◽  
pp. 199-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan M. Cabasés

The setting of priorities in mental health care evaluation requires considering future trends in mental health services. Three areas of change are mentioned in this paper: the development of services, the increase of the burden of illness, and reform processes in health care systems. Economic evaluation of mental health services has to consider the different roles of the agents acting in mental health care, policy-makers, companies, researchers and care professionals, and patients and their relatives.Despite the increasing work done, most mental health care interventions have either not been evaluated or have been ill evaluated. There is a sense of paucity of measurement that has to be enriched with more and better evaluative research. Some unresolved methodological issues are commented on in this paper. In particular, direct costs outside the health care sector, indirect costs and quality of life measurement are briefly analysed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S598-S598
Author(s):  
S. Elstner

IntroductionIn Germany, mental health care in people with IDD is mostly determined by experts’ opinions. Particularities of the psychiatric assessment and treatment of people with IDD and a co-morbid psychiatric disorder are taught neither at medical schools nor in the scope of the medical training of psychiatrists.ObjectivesThe present study examined the influence of socio-political aspects of health care on quality and organisation of mental health care in people with IDD.MethodsVarious aspects of health care systems in Germany and three other European countries were explored and juxtaposed subsequently with a special developed questionnaire.ResultsThe health care systems of four different European countries differ in socio-economical, educational and system-financed aspects.ConclusionsDiffering organisational levels of national health care systems and socio-economical aspects within these countries contribute to the organisation of the mental health care system in people with IDD. Suggestions for a better harmonisation of European mental health care in people with IDD are offered.Disclosure of interestThe author has not supplied his declaration of competing interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document