Use of Information Technology in Medication Reconciliation: A Scoping Review

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 885-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesdeep Bassi ◽  
Francis Lau ◽  
Stan Bardal
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Liu ◽  
Joy Lee ◽  
Michael Weiner

Background: Transgender people face many potential barriers in healthcare, such as real or perceived discrimination, inability to pay for healthcare services, and misinformation about transgender health needs. It has been hypothesized that, because of these barriers, transgender people may be more receptive to using health information technology than other populations. The purpose of this scoping review was to understand the ways transgender people use health information technology. Methods: This scoping review included English studies that addressed use of technology by transgender people in health sciences literature. The inclusion criteria was studies that documented transgender technology use and did not include studies that only focused on technology use by healthcare providers. Included studies were sorted into categories based on the type of technology transgender participants used. Results: Twenty-nine articles met the study inclusion criteria from an initial pool of 1,276 articles searched from online databases. Many studies were involved with multiple categories. Fourteen articles addressed websites targeting transgender people, twelve included the usage of online social media sites, seven articles involved transgender usage of online surveys, and four articles discussed transgender usage of smartphones in health management. Conclusion and potential impact: Twenty-two studies focused on the application of interventions through websites and social media sites, nineteen of which concluded that web-based health information or interventions were feasible methods to affect the health of transgender people. Sixteen studies concluded that online interactions were accepted, if not preferred, by their transgender participants. This review suggests that further integration of online interventions and healthcare information into these mediums may increase transgender engagement in healthcare and reduce healthcare barriers. Future research to improve understanding of the outcomes of health information technology on the health of transgender people would be an asset for treating a historically medically underserved community.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 605-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brígida Dias Fernandes ◽  
Paulo Henrique Ribeiro Fernandes Almeida ◽  
Aline Aparecida Foppa ◽  
Camila Tavares Sousa ◽  
Lorena Rocha Ayres ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 146045822098727
Author(s):  
Abdullah Al Anazi

The Medication Reconciliation (MedRec) process aims to improve patient safety through safe prescription and medication administration. A validated survey was carried out to address aspects related to MedRec process, its obstacles, the role of information technology, and the required functionalities for optimizing the MedRec process. A total of 81% of the survey’s respondents acknowledged the roles of EHR (62% of respondents), PHR (41%), and electronic medication registration list (33%) as necessary technology tools for MedRec. Most respondents emphasized the need to compile multiple medications’ entries of information technology systems into one application (96.4%), allowing the entries from community pharmacies (90.6%). Further, incorporating information technology into the MedRec process presents a challenge in terms of legal responsibility (92 %) and the ability to integrate medications with other hospitals and community medications (78.6%). Findings affirm the need for a well-designed MedRec process aided with information technology solutions. The external data and user preferences should be considered when redesigning the MedRec process. The study also suggests initiating a policy that mandates sharing data necessary for creating a compiled medication list for each patient. MedRec is an indispensable tool for building a fruitful medication management system in a healthcare organization.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian B. R. Shatte ◽  
Samantha Teague

This paper aims to synthesise the literature on technology-based microlearning in higher education. Six education, information technology, and interdisciplinary research databases were searched using key terms relating to technology-based microlearning in higher education. Articles were assessed by two reviewers, and data were extracted on the article’s microlearning features, supporting technologies, educational discipline, and outcomes for teaching and learning . Articles were then synthesised via narrative review. Forty papers focusing on the application of technology-based microlearning to higher education were identified. Three keys themes emerged, including: (i) methods for microlearning design and delivery; (ii) the impact of microlearning on objective student outcomes (e.g. academic performance and participation); and (iii) the impact of microlearning on subjective student outcomes (e.g. motivation to learn and user experience of using microlearning technologies). Overall, the application of microlearning to higher education has demonstrated a range of benefits for both objective and subjective student outcomes. With the majority of studies reporting on small-scale studies conducted across various disciplines, it is evident that there is significant room for further research on the application of technology-based microlearning to further understand the nuances of its application in higher education. Combined, the results of the current study collate the existing evidence on the benefits and limitations of microlearning in higher education, and can thus assist educational practitioners in incorporating microlearning content into their own teaching materials.


Author(s):  
Outi Tuominen ◽  
Heljä Lundgrén Laine ◽  
Mervi Flinkman ◽  
Sirkku Boucht ◽  
Sanna Salanterä

2013 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 522-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Ying Lee ◽  
Li-Na Kuo ◽  
Yi-Chun Chiang ◽  
Jing-Yi Hou ◽  
Tzu-Ying Wu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document