Probiotics for Disease Prevention: A Focus on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1425-1432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Bailey ◽  
Siu Yan Yeung
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Patient Disposition ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Colonization Rates ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Objective: To summarize published data regarding the safety and efficacy of probiotics in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Data Sources: PubMed databases (January 2000-August 2011) were searched and a bibliographic review of published articles was performed to identify original reports of probiotic administration for the prevention of VAP using the search terms probiotics, synbiotics, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Two pilot studies, 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 1 meta-analysis have addressed probiotic use for VAP prevention and were included in the review. Data Synthesis: VAP frequently occurs in mechanically ventilated patients. Given the lack of new antimicrobial agents, probiotics have been studied for their ability to modify human microflora colonization. Two studies examining pathogen colonization rates favored probiotics, with reduced incidence and increased duration until the emergence of new species. One prospective RCT found significant reduction in the incidence of VAP and colonization rates, but no significant difference in patient disposition outcomes. Another RCT examining 28-day mortality found no overall benefit with probiotic use and no reduction in colonization rates. Conclusions: Clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a consistent beneficial effect of probiotics in mechanically ventilated patients; thus, they are not recommended for routine clinical use. However, heterogeneity among study designs may hinder this assessment and the designs should be unified in future research.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Communication Board on Level of Satisfaction Over Communication among Mechanically Venitlated Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 311-316
Author(s):  
Dr. Metilda ◽  
Dr. A. Jaganath
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 15 ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Ventilated Patients ◽  
Communication Board

Mechanical ventilation is widely used to treat patients with critical conditions. This treatment is usually applied for difficulty in breathing. The use of mechanical ventilation devices has unique benefits to the patient. However, it can also cause various problems. Reduction in communication rank as one of the most negative experiences in mechanically ventilated patients. Effective communication with ventilator-based patients is essential. Nursing management of a mechanically ventilated patient is challenging on many levels, requiring a wealth of high technical skills. The Patient Communications Board improves communication, maintains information and creates a comfortable, attractive setting for patient, family and health care workers. The research methodology used for the study is a Quasi experimental approach, post-test only design with a comparison group to assess the effect of the communication board on the level of satisfaction over communication among clients on mechanical ventilator. The sample was selected by purposive sampling technique and included 30 (experimental group-15, control group-15), mechanically ventilated patients in PESIMR hospital, Kuppam. The control group patients were provided with routine communication methods, while the experimental group were communicated with communication board. The level of satisfaction on communication was assessed by a 15items rating scale. Data was analysed using both the descriptive and inferential statistics. There was a significant difference in the level of satisfaction on communication among the patients who were communicated using communication board compared to the routine method of communication. The communication board had significantly improved the communication pattern and increased the satisfaction among the patients who are mechanically ventilated.

scholarly journals Effect of gastric residual volume monitoring on incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to intensive care unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elnaz Faramarzi ◽  
Ata Mahmoodpoor ◽  
Hadi Hamishehkar ◽  
Kamran Shadvar ◽  
Afshin Iranpour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Residual Volume ◽  
Gastric Residual Volume ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Objectives: The value of gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has frequently been questioned in the past years. In this trial, the effect of GRV on the frequency of VAP was evaluated in critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: This descriptive study was carried out on 150 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit over a 14-month period, from October 2015 to January 2017. GRV was measured every three hours, and gastric intolerance was defined as GRV>250 cc. The incidence of vomiting and VAP, GRV, length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, APACHE II and SOFA scores, and mortality rate were noted. Results: The mean APACHEII and SOFA scores, ICU length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation in the GRV>250ml group were significantly higher than in the GRV≤250 ml group (P<0.05). Also, a significantly higher number of patients in the GRV>250ml group experienced infection (62.3%) and vomiting (71.7%) compared with the GRV≤250 group (P<0.01). The highest OR was observed for SOFA score >15 and APACHE II >30, which increased the risk of GVR>250 ml by 10.09 (1.01-99.97) and 8.78 (1.49-51.58), respectively. Moreover, the increase in GVR was found to be higher in the non-survivor than in the survivor group. Conclusion: Increased GRV did not result in increased rates of VAP, ICU length of stay, and mortality. Therefore, the routine measurement of GRV as an important element of the VAP prevention bundle is not recommended in critically ill patients. How to cite this: Faramarzi E, Mahmoodpoor A, Hamishehkar H, Shadvar K, Iranpour A, Sabzevari T, et al. Effect of gastric residual volume monitoring on incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to intensive care unit. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(1):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.1.1321 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Effect of gastric residual volume monitoring on incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to intensive care unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elnaz Faramarzi ◽  
Ata Mahmoodpoor ◽  
Hadi Hamishehkar ◽  
Kamran Shadvar ◽  
Afshin Iranpour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Residual Volume ◽  
Gastric Residual Volume ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Objectives: The value of gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has frequently been questioned in the past years. In this trial, the effect of GRV on the frequency of VAP was evaluated in critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: This descriptive study was carried out on 150 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit over a 14-month period, from October 2015 to January 2017. GRV was measured every three hours, and gastric intolerance was defined as GRV>250 cc. The incidence of vomiting and VAP, GRV, length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay, APACHE II and SOFA scores, and mortality rate were noted. Results: The mean APACHEII and SOFA scores, ICU length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation in the GRV>250ml group were significantly higher than in the GRV≤250 ml group (P<0.05). Also, a significantly higher number of patients in the GRV>250ml group experienced infection (62.3%) and vomiting (71.7%) compared with the GRV≤250 group (P<0.01). The highest OR was observed for SOFA score >15 and APACHE II >30, which increased the risk of GVR>250 ml by 10.09 (1.01-99.97) and 8.78 (1.49-51.58), respectively. Moreover, the increase in GVR was found to be higher in the non-survivor than in the survivor group. Conclusion: Increased GRV did not result in increased rates of VAP, ICU length of stay, and mortality. Therefore, the routine measurement of GRV as an important element of the VAP prevention bundle is not recommended in critically ill patients. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.1321 How to cite this: Faramarzi E, Mahmoodpoor A, Hamishehkar H, Shadvar K, Iranpour A, Sabzevari T, et al. Effect of gastric residual volume monitoring on incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to intensive care unit. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(2):48-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.1321 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Management of sedation in the critically ill

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhakti K. Patel ◽  
John P. Kress
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Moving Target ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Prolonged Sedation ◽  
Frequent Assessment ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Once adequate analgesia is confirmed, the need for sedation should be considered. Sedation of mechanically-ventilated patients is a common challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU). Metabolism of sedatives in critical illness can be unpredictable and achieving optimal sedation without coma is a moving target. Once adequate analgesia is achieved, the choice, depth, and duration of sedation can have major implications for the presence of delirium, the duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and ICU length of stay. Therefore, goal-directed titration of sedative and frequent assessment of the depth of sedation is important to strike the delicate balance of patient comfort, while avoiding excessive prolonged sedation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document