Relationships between risk-taking behaviour and subsequent risk perceptions

2005 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Brown
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 150-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chu-Hsiang Chang ◽  
Thomas E. Bernard ◽  
Jennifer Logan

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 606-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Jane Liu ◽  
Chih-Ling Tsai ◽  
Ming-Chun Wang ◽  
Ning Zhu

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Buttmann ◽  
Ann Nielsen ◽  
Christian Munk ◽  
Kirsten Frederiksen ◽  
Kai–Li Liaw ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S533-S533
Author(s):  
Y. Pollak ◽  
H. Aloni ◽  
R. Shoham

Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with increased engagement in risk-taking behaviors. The present study aimed to further our knowledge regarding the extent and the reasons for the association between ADHD symptoms and risk-taking, using a theory-driven behavioral economy theory. The Domain Specific Risk-Taking scale was used, on which 244 adults rated the likelihood of engagement in a range of risky behaviors, across five real life domains, as well as the magnitude of perceived benefit and risk they ascribed to these behaviors. Level of ADHD symptoms was positively correlated with engagement in risky behaviors and benefit perception, but not with risk perception. Mediation analysis confirmed that benefit perception, but not risk perception, mediated the association between ADHD symptoms and engagement in risk-taking behaviors (Fig. 1). These findings emphasize the role of benefit perception in facilitating risk-taking by people with ADHD symptoms.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Permut ◽  
Julie S. Downs ◽  
Silvia Saccardo ◽  
George F. Loewenstein
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Garrett C. C. Smith ◽  
Gaurav Gupta

Although hedge funds typically report a 2 and 20 fee structure, some investors want to change this standard practice. Many funds sustained substantial losses as a result of the financial crisis of 2007–2008. Given the strategies used by hedge funds, they were not supposed to incur large losses. Subsequent underperformance to equity during the bull market recovery left many investors questioning the fee structure. Research shows the fee structure is more fluid than typically reported. The reluctance of many hedge fund managers to appear weak perpetuates the reported 2 and 20 fee structure. Fees respond to the relative bargaining power between managers and investors. Some investors speculate that the fee structure encourages managers to undertake high-risk strategies. However, fees and other incentive provisions, such as a high-water mark, provide better opportunities for talented managers to enter the industry, mitigating their subsequent risk-taking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document