College on Credit: A Multilevel Analysis of Student Loan Default

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas W. Hillman
1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Fredericks Volkwein ◽  
Bruce P. Szelest

1989 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura L. Greene

An existing model of student loan default uses discriminant function analysis to identify the characteristics of borrowers who repay their loans and those who default. This paper uses data on National Direct Student Loan borrowers at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro to confirm the results of a previous paper’s discriminant function analysis and to present an alternative method of analysis, the Tobit technique. An advantage of Tobit is that it uses information not only from the categorical default/no default decision but also from the magnitude of the default.


1998 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Fredericks Volkwein ◽  
Bruce P. Szelest ◽  
Alberto F. Cabrera ◽  
Michelle R. Napierski-Prancl

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev Darolia

Student loan debt and defaults have been steadily rising, igniting public worry about the associated public and private risks. This has led to controversial regulatory attempts to curb defaults by holding colleges, particularly those in the for-profit sector, increasingly accountable for the student loan repayment behavior of their students. Such efforts endeavor to protect taxpayers against the misuse of public money used to encourage college enrollment and to safeguard students against potentially risky human capital investments. Recent policy proposals penalize colleges for students’ poor repayment performance, raising questions about institutions’ power to influence this behavior. Many of the schools at risk of not meeting student loan default measures also disproportionately enroll low-income, nontraditional, and financially independent students. Policy makers therefore face the challenge of promoting the efficient use of public funds and protecting students while also encouraging access to higher education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document