Property and Natural Law in Rerum Novarum and the Summa Theologiae 2-2, Q. 66, AA, 1, 2, 7 by Abdon Ma. C. Josol, C.SS.R.

1987 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-542
Author(s):  
Matthew Habiger
1979 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. B. F. Midgley

In my study, The Natural Law Tradition and the Theory of International Relations, reviewed in Hedley Bull's interesting article, there are no chapters devoted to natural law thinkers before the thirteenth century. Any lengthening of an already long manuscript might have diminished its prospects of publication. In the absence of a full survey of the strengths and weaknesses of earlier theories, there are various explicit or implied judgements on positions of Aristotle, the Stoics, Cicero and Augustine in chapters dealing primarily with other matters. Whilst referring to sources of Aquinas's doctrine, I did not give a detailed account of the historical formation of his teaching. I concentrated upon St. Thomas's discussion of the various kinds of law and especially upon the doctrine of eternal law which he brought to a certain perfection. In doing this, I was consoled by the view which I shared with Vincent McNabb that “it was always the thought of Aquinas never the history of that thought which seemed of greatest worth…” Indeed, given the incompleteness of so much of the discussion on the intellectual reconciliation of natural and divine law before Aquinas, it is arguable that McNabb was hardly exaggerating very greatly when he wrote that Aquinas's treatise on law in the Summa theologiae “would seem be the first great treatise ever written on law”.


Author(s):  
Piotr H. Kosicki

This chapter explores the origins of Catholic discourses of “revolution” in the writings of Thomas Aquinas and his late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century interpreters. Leo XIII (1878–1903) launched his papacy with a promise of “Thomist renewal.” In response, a generation of Catholic thinkers from across Europe developed their own visions of a just society. French philosopher Jacques Maritain and his Polish counterparts, the priests Władysław Korniłowicz and Antoni Szymański, made a passionate case for the “human person” as a concept rooted in their study of Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae. Their generation confronted powerful currents of integral nationalism in French Action (France) and National Democracy (Poland). Responding to Leo XIII’s 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, they attempted to break with the integralist currents—with, at best, limited success. These early Catholic “revolutionaries” included Thomists, social Catholics, and Europe’s first Christian Democrats. In the 1930s, as republics collapsed across Europe and both fascist regimes and the nascent Soviet Union grew in power, the generation of laymen who had studied under Korniłowicz, Maritain, and Szymański began looking for more radical solutions. First and foremost among these budding radicals was Emmanuel Mounier, and it was principally to him that subsequent generations turned.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-202
Author(s):  
E. Christian Brugger ◽  

Fifty years of debate have strengthened Germain Grisez’s 1965 interpretation of St. Thomas Aquinas’s famous article on the natural law in Summa theologiae I-II.94.2. Revisiting Grisez’s argument in light of these developments reveals that his “gerundive interpretation” of the first principle of practical reason is not only Thomistic, but essentially Aquinas’s interpretation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document