scholarly journals Distribution and trophic transfer of engineered nanoparticles along aquatic food chains and related influencing factors: A review

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 790-800
Author(s):  
Jian Zhao ◽  
Lina Xu ◽  
Shuang Yin ◽  
Yue Li ◽  
Zhenyu Wang ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1240-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuyue Shi ◽  
Cheng Long Wang ◽  
Han Zhang ◽  
Chunying Chen ◽  
Xian Zhang ◽  
...  

Understanding the trophic transfer and biomagnification potential of nanomaterials in aquatic food chains is crucial for assessing the environmental risks of such materials.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 1029-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marja L. Boström ◽  
Gustaf Ugge ◽  
Jan Åke Jönsson ◽  
Olof Berglund
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
GRAHAM P. HARRIS ◽  
F. BRIAN GRIFFITHS
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 374 (1786) ◽  
pp. 20190090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Wilken ◽  
Charmaine C. M. Yung ◽  
Maria Hamilton ◽  
Kenneth Hoadley ◽  
Juliana Nzongo ◽  
...  

Photosynthesis in eukaryotes first arose through phagocytotic processes wherein an engulfed cyanobacterium was not digested, but instead became a permanent organelle. Other photosynthetic lineages then arose when eukaryotic cells engulfed other already photosynthetic eukaryotic cells. Some of the resulting lineages subsequently lost their ability for phagocytosis, while many others maintained the ability to do both processes. These mixotrophic taxa have more complicated ecological roles, in that they are both primary producers and consumers that can shift more towards producing the organic matter that forms the base of aquatic food chains, or towards respiring and releasing CO 2 . We still have much to learn about which taxa are predatory mixotrophs as well as about the physiological consequences of this lifestyle, in part, because much of the diversity of unicellular eukaryotes in aquatic ecosystems remains uncultured. Here, we discuss existing methods for studying predatory mixotrophs, their individual biases, and how single-cell approaches can enhance knowledge of these important taxa. The question remains what the gold standard should be for assigning a mixotrophic status to ill-characterized or uncultured taxa—a status that dictates how organisms are incorporated into carbon cycle models and how their ecosystem roles may shift in future lakes and oceans. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Single cell ecology’.


2013 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariah Mailman ◽  
R. A. Bodaly ◽  
Michael J. Paterson ◽  
Shirley Thompson ◽  
Robert J. Flett

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Séverine Le Faucheur ◽  
Yvan Tremblay ◽  
Claude Fortin ◽  
Peter G. C. Campbell

Environmental contextMercury is classified as a priority pollutant owing to the biomagnification of its methylated species along food chains and the consequent effects on top consumers. The pH of natural waters affects many of the biogeochemical processes that control mercury accumulation in aquatic organisms. Here, evidence is presented that pH affects mercury uptake by unicellular algae, primary producers in aquatic food chains, thereby providing a new example of the pervasive influence of pH on the mercury biogeochemical cycle. AbstractWe have examined the influence of pH on HgII uptake (mainly in the form of the lipophilic complex HgCl2) by a green, unicellular alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Uptake of the dichloro complex increased by a factor of 1.6 to 2 when the pH was lowered from 6.5 to 5.5, an unexpected result given that the intracellular hydrolysis rate of fluorescein diacetate (FDA), used as a probe for the passive diffusion of lipophilic solutes through algal membranes, decreased in the studied alga under similar conditions. Several mechanisms were explored to explain the enhanced uptake at pH 5.5, including pH-induced changes in cell surface binding of Hg or in Hg loss rates from cells, but none of them gave completely satisfactory explanations. The present findings imply that inorganic HgII in aqueous solution behaves, in terms of uptake, neither as a lipophilic complex (the uptake of which would be expected to decrease with acidification because of algal membrane packing), nor as a cationic metal (the transport of which by facilitated transport would be expected to diminish with increasing proton concentration because of metal–proton competition at the transporter binding sites). Mercury uptake by algae seems rather to be stimulated by proton addition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document