High dispersive TIR-GRISMs with flattened angular dispersion profile

Author(s):  
M. Heusinger ◽  
T. Flügel-Paul ◽  
K. Grabowski ◽  
D. Michaelis ◽  
U. D. Zeitner
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Biggin ◽  
Richard K. Bono ◽  
Domenico G. Meduri ◽  
Courtney J. Sprain ◽  
Christopher J. Davies ◽  
...  

AbstractA defining characteristic of the recent geomagnetic field is its dominant axial dipole which provides its navigational utility and dictates the shape of the magnetosphere. Going back through time, much less is known about the degree of axial dipole dominance. Here we use a substantial and diverse set of 3D numerical dynamo simulations and recent observation-based field models to derive a power law relationship between the angular dispersion of virtual geomagnetic poles at the equator and the median axial dipole dominance measured at Earth’s surface. Applying this relation to published estimates of equatorial angular dispersion implies that geomagnetic axial dipole dominance averaged over 107–109 years has remained moderately high and stable through large parts of geological time. This provides an observational constraint to future studies of the geodynamo and palaeomagnetosphere. It also provides some reassurance as to the reliability of palaeogeographical reconstructions provided by palaeomagnetism.


2001 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 200 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.K. Ann Ngoi ◽  
Krishnan Venkatakrishnan ◽  
L.E.N. Lim ◽  
B. Tan

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Alford ◽  
Russell J. Gehr ◽  
R. L. Schmitt ◽  
A. V. Smith ◽  
Gunnar Arisholm

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan P. Torres ◽  
Martin Hendrych ◽  
Alejandra Valencia

Ring ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-69
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Ożarowska ◽  
Reuven Yosef

A comparison of the Emlen funnel and Busse's flat cage for orientation studies The Emlen funnel cage was introduced in 1966. Since then it has been used in numerous studies on bird orientation. In 1995, Busse proposed another technique - in the form of flat, round cylindrical cage. Busse also tested nocturnal migrants in the daytime. He, and Nowakowski and Malecka (1999), proved that birds tested in daylight and at night displayed similar distributions of their preferred directions. This study also supports their findings. Zehtindijev et al. (2003) found that results in the Emlen funnel and Busse's flat cage were coherent, despite the tests were performed in different conditions (night-day) and in different years. This study is the first one that compares results of the same individuals tested in the two types of orientation cages during the day (N = 75) and night (N = 17). Results of both methods did not differ (Watson-Williams test of mean angles, Mann-Whitney U-test of angular dispersion) both during the day and at night. Multiheading bird behaviour is common in both types of cages and seems to be a normal feature of orientation data. The only difference was found in bird activity (i.e. number of scratches during 10 minutes of testing) that was higher for Busse's flat cage in daytime tests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document