Optical Sectioning Fluorescence Spectroscopy in a Programmable Array Microscope

1998 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quentin S. Hanley ◽  
Peter J. Verveer ◽  
Thomas M. Jovin

We report the use of a programmable array microscope (PAM) for the acquisition of spectrally resolved and high-throughput optical sections. The microscope is based on the use of a spatial light modulator for defining patterns of excitation and/or detection of fluorescence. For obtaining optically sectioned spectral images, the entrance slit of an imaging spectrograph and a line illumination pattern defined with a spatial light modulator are placed in conjugate optical positions. Compared to wide-field illumination, optical sectioning led to greater than 3× improvement in the rejection of out-of-focus fluorescence emission and nearly 6× greater peak-to-background ratios in biological specimens, yielding better contrast and spectral characterization. These effects resulted from a reduction in the artifacts arising from spectral contributions of structures outside the region of interest. We used the programmable illumination capability of the spectroscopic system to explore a variety of excitation/detection patterns for increasing the throughput of optical sectioning microscopes. A Sylvester-type Hadamard construction was particularly efficient, performing optical sectioning while maintaining a 50% optical throughput. These results demonstrate the feasibility of full-field highly multiplexed confocal spectral imaging.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0244034
Author(s):  
Yao L. Wang ◽  
Noa W. F. Grooms ◽  
Sabrina C. Civale ◽  
Samuel H. Chung

Confocal microscopes can reject out-of-focus and scattered light; however, widefield microscopes are far more common in biological laboratories due to their accessibility and lower cost. We report confocal imaging capacity on a widefield microscope by adding a spatial light modulator (SLM) and utilizing custom illumination and acquisition methods. We discuss our illumination strategy and compare several procedures for postprocessing the acquired image data. We assessed the performance of this system for rejecting out-of-focus light by comparing images taken at 1.4 NA using our widefield microscope, our SLM-enhanced setup, and a commercial confocal microscope. The optical sectioning capability, assessed on thin fluorescent film, was 0.85 ± 0.04 μm for our SLM-enhanced setup and 0.68 ± 0.04 μm for a confocal microscope, while a widefield microscope exhibited no sectioning capability. We demonstrate our setup by imaging the same set of neurons in C. elegans on widefield, SLM, and confocal microscopes. SLM enhancement greatly reduces background from the cell body, allowing visualization of dim fibers nearby. Our SLM-enhanced setup identified 96% of the dim neuronal fibers seen in confocal images while a widefield microscope only identified 50% of the same fibers. Our microscope add-on represents a very simple (2-component) and inexpensive (<$600) approach to enable widefield microscopes to optically section thick samples.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (S3) ◽  
pp. 388-389
Author(s):  
Zdeněk Švindrych ◽  
Pavel Křížek ◽  
Evgeny Smirnov ◽  
Martin Ovesný ◽  
Josef Borkovec ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (22) ◽  
pp. 5883
Author(s):  
Jeong-Heon Han ◽  
Nak-Won Yoo ◽  
Myung-Ha Kim ◽  
Byeong-Kwon Ju ◽  
Min-Chul Park

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 3432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gannavarpu Rajshekhar ◽  
Basanta Bhaduri ◽  
Chris Edwards ◽  
Renjie Zhou ◽  
Lynford L. Goddard ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingling Zhao ◽  
Ken Abe ◽  
Shilpi Rajoria ◽  
Qi Pian ◽  
Margarida Barroso ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document