scholarly journals Correction: Why Lyme disease is common in the northern US, but rare in the south: The roles of host choice, host-seeking behavior, and tick density

PLoS Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. e3001396
Author(s):  
Howard S. Ginsberg ◽  
Graham J. Hickling ◽  
Russell L. Burke ◽  
Nicholas H. Ogden ◽  
Lorenza Beati ◽  
...  
PLoS Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. e3001066
Author(s):  
Howard S. Ginsberg ◽  
Graham J. Hickling ◽  
Russell L. Burke ◽  
Nicholas H. Ogden ◽  
Lorenza Beati ◽  
...  

Lyme disease is common in the northeastern United States, but rare in the southeast, even though the tick vector is found in both regions. Infection prevalence of Lyme spirochetes in host-seeking ticks, an important component to the risk of Lyme disease, is also high in the northeast and northern midwest, but declines sharply in the south. As ticks must acquire Lyme spirochetes from infected vertebrate hosts, the role of wildlife species composition on Lyme disease risk has been a topic of lively academic discussion. We compared tick–vertebrate host interactions using standardized sampling methods among 8 sites scattered throughout the eastern US. Geographical trends in diversity of tick hosts are gradual and do not match the sharp decline in prevalence at southern sites, but tick–host associations show a clear shift from mammals in the north to reptiles in the south. Tick infection prevalence declines north to south largely because of high tick infestation of efficient spirochete reservoir hosts (rodents and shrews) in the north but not in the south. Minimal infestation of small mammals in the south results from strong selective attachment to lizards such as skinks (which are inefficient reservoirs for Lyme spirochetes) in the southern states. Selective host choice, along with latitudinal differences in tick host-seeking behavior and variations in tick densities, explains the geographic pattern of Lyme disease in the eastern US.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e0164518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angélique Porciani ◽  
Malal Diop ◽  
Nicolas Moiroux ◽  
Tatiana Kadoke-Lambi ◽  
Anna Cohuet ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunjie Li ◽  
Xianhong Zhou ◽  
Edwin E. Lewis ◽  
Yi Yu ◽  
Congli Wang

Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 507
Author(s):  
Younes Laidoudi ◽  
Djamel Tahir ◽  
Hacène Medkour ◽  
Marie Varloud ◽  
Oleg Mediannikov ◽  
...  

Dinotefuran-Permethrin-Pyriproxyfen (DPP) is used to kill and repel mosquitoes from dogs. However, the influence of the product on the host-seeking behavior of mosquitoes remains unknown. The interference of DPP with the host selection of unfed female Aedes albopictus was investigated. A total of 18 animals (9 mice and 9 rats) were divided into three groups of six animals each. DU: DPP treated rats (n = 3) with untreated mice (n = 3), UD: DPP treated mice (n = 3) with untreated rats (n = 3) and control UU: untreated mice (n = 3) and untreated rats (n = 3). In each group, the rats and mice were placed 30 cm apart. After sedation, the animals in each group were exposed twice (Day 1 and Day 7 post-treatment) for one hour to 71 ± 3 female mosquitoes. Mosquitoes were categorized after the 2-h post-exposure period as dead or alive. Blood-meal origin was determined from mosquitoes using a newly customized duplex qPCR. The highest values of forage ratio (1.36 ≥ wi ≤ 1.88) and selection index (0.63 ≥ Bi ≤ 0.94) for rat hosts indicates a preference of mosquitoes for this species as compared to mice when co-housed during the exposure. The mosquitoes only seldom fed on mice, even in the untreated group. The anti-feeding effect of DPP was therefore only assessed on rat’s hosts. The results showed that DPP, when directly applied on rats, provided a direct protection of 82% and 61% on Day 1 and Day 7, respectively, while when applied on mice hosts (UD), the DPP provided an indirect protection of 21% and 10% on Day 1 and Day 7, respectively. The results showed also that DPP, when applied on rats, provided a direct protection against Ae. albopictus bites. This effect did not result in increased exposure of the untreated host placed in the same cage at a distance of 30 cm.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ximena E Bernal ◽  
Priyanka de Silva

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e3433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Castillo-Neyra ◽  
Corentin M. Barbu ◽  
Renzo Salazar ◽  
Katty Borrini ◽  
Cesar Naquira ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Brown ◽  
Marc J. Klowden ◽  
Joe W. Crim ◽  
Larry Young ◽  
Lisa A. Shrouder ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document