scholarly journals Evolutionary History of the GABA Transporter (GAT) Group Revealed by Marine Invertebrate GAT-1

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e82410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azusa Kinjo ◽  
Tomoko Koito ◽  
So Kawaguchi ◽  
Koji Inoue
2021 ◽  
Vol 288 (1947) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Petsios ◽  
Roger W. Portell ◽  
Lyndsey Farrar ◽  
Shamindri Tennakoon ◽  
Tobias B. Grun ◽  
...  

Predation traces found on fossilized prey remains can be used to quantify the evolutionary history of biotic interactions. Fossil mollusc shells bearing these types of traces provided key evidence for the rise of predation during the Mesozoic marine revolution (MMR), an event thought to have reorganized global marine ecosystems. However, predation pressure on prey groups other than molluscs has not been explored adequately. Consequently, the ubiquity, tempo and synchronicity of the MMR cannot be thoroughly assessed. Here, we expand the evolutionary record of biotic interactions by compiling and analysing a new comprehensively collected database on drilling predation in Meso-Cenozoic echinoids. Trends in drilling frequency reveal an Eocene rise in drilling predation that postdated echinoid infaunalization and the rise in mollusc-targeted drilling (an iconic MMR event) by approximately 100 Myr. The temporal lag between echinoid infaunalization and the rise in drilling frequencies suggests that the Eocene upsurge in predation did not elicit a coevolutionary or escalatory response. This is consistent with rarity of fossil samples that record high frequency of drilling predation and scarcity of fossil prey recording failed predation events. These results suggest that predation intensification associated with the MMR was asynchronous across marine invertebrate taxa and represented a long and complex process that consisted of multiple uncoordinated steps probably with variable coevolutionary responses.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Lamsdell ◽  
◽  
Melanie J. Hopkins

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Garcia ◽  
◽  
Hanon McShea ◽  
Bryan Kolaczkowski ◽  
Betul Kacar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document