scholarly journals Risk Factors of Neurosensory Disturbance following Orthognathic Surgery

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e91055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albraa Badr Alolayan ◽  
Yiu Yan Leung
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-88
Author(s):  
Salwa El-Habbash ◽  
Timothy McSwiney

Condylar resorption (CR) can be categorized into functional and dysfunctional remodelling of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). The literature describes dysfunctional remodelling of the TMJ as idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR). Idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) is a well-documented but poorly understood pathological entity that can occur spontaneously or post-orthognathic surgery. It predominantly affects young women, with other risk factors including Class 2 malocclusion with steep mandibular plane angles. It is distinguished by a decreased condylar head volume and ramus height, progressive mandibular retrusion and an anterior open bite. Its aetiology can be categorized into surgical and non-surgical risk factors. These include hormones, systemic disease, trauma, mechanical load and surgical risk factors, such as magnitude and direction of mandibular movement, type of surgical fixation and length of post-operative maxilla-mandibular fixation. ICR is a diagnosis of exclusion, and identified by a combination of clinical, radiographic and haematological findings. Multiple treatment options have been described in the literature, including medical management, orthodontics, orthognathic surgery, TMJ surgery, TMJ and orthognathic surgery combined, and total joint prosthesis reconstruction. Further research is required to better understand the aetiology of ICR and more long-term, controlled, multicentre clinical studies are needed to evaluate the outcomes of surgical and non-surgical management of CR patients. CPD/Clinical Relevance: Idiopathic condylar resorption has many presentations and potential causes that can greatly impact the decisions and outcomes for orthodontic/orthognathic treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 770-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Gómez-Barrachina ◽  
J.M. Montiel-Company ◽  
V. García-Sanz ◽  
J.M. Almerich-Silla ◽  
V. Paredes-Gallardo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rei Jokaji ◽  
Kazuhiro Ooi ◽  
Sayuri Takamichi ◽  
Yusuke Nakade ◽  
Shuichi Kawashiri ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Prevalence of silent obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with dentofacial deformities is unknown, although OSA is severe risk of airway obstruction in perioperative orthognathic surgery or complication after surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate prevalence and risk factors of silent OSA in patients with dentofacial deformities. Methods We analyzed 72 patients (24 male, 48 female) with dentofacial deformities without previous OSA symptoms. Polysomnography was performed before orthognathic surgery. Prevalence and risk factors of silent OSA were statistically analyzed as related to Apnea hypopnea index (AHI). Results Mean AHI was 1.6 (range: 0-12.1) /h. Three patients of 72 patients (4.1%) were diagnosed silent OSA. AHI during REM sleep phase 3.7 (0-32.3) was higher than AHI during NREM sleep phase 1.0 (0-9.7). AHI of male patients was higher than that of female. AHI was increased according to high BMI. AHI was higher in deep bite than open bite, edge to edge bite and nomal bite. AHI of mandibular asymmetry cases were higher than that of symmetry cases. Conclusions The prevalence of silent OSA was 4.1%. Obesity, male, deep bite, mandibular asymmetry and REM sleep phase were risk factors of silent OSA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 92-97
Author(s):  
Timothy McSwiney ◽  
Sadaf Khan ◽  
Daljit Dhariwal

Orthognathic surgery involves the correction of severe dentofacial deformities through a combination of orthodontics, surgery and, occasionally, restorative dentistry. This procedure, when involving surgical movement of the maxilla, can lead to changes in the overlying nasal morphology. In this paper, the standard nasal assessment that is undertaken prior to a Le Fort I osteotomy is outlined along with the reported nasal changes seen following this procedure. In addition, the various risk factors associated with adverse nasal changes are considered, as are the management techniques adopted by clinicians to minimize these changes CPD/Clinical Relevance: Clinicians should be aware of the adverse nasal changes associated with the Le Fort I osteotomy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrik Widar ◽  
Mariam Afshari ◽  
Lars Rasmusson ◽  
Christer Dahlin ◽  
Hossein Kashani

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon-Jung Hwang ◽  
Piet E Haers ◽  
Burkhardt Seifert ◽  
Hermann F Sailer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document