scholarly journals Induction with Lopinavir-Based Treatment Followed by Switch to Nevirapine-Based Regimen versus Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors-Based Treatment for First Line Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV Infected Children Three Years and Older

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e108063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Alvarez-Uria ◽  
Raghavakalyan Pakam ◽  
Praveen Kumar Naik ◽  
Manoranjan Midde
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors ◽  
First Line ◽  
Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

scholarly journals Diabetes and HIV

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (02) ◽  
pp. 45-49
Author(s):  
Ranabir Salam ◽  
Sarita Bajaj ◽  
Nitin Kapoor ◽  
Banshi Saboo ◽  
Arundhati Dasgupta
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hiv Patients ◽  
Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors ◽  
Family History Of Diabetes ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
History Of

AbstractIn India, the prevalence of HIV infection among adults (15–49 years) is estimated at 0.26%. The total number of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in India was estimated at 21.17 lakhs in 2015. There has been a declining trend in the mortality rate of HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART). With HIV becoming a chronic manageable disease, metabolic complications like diabetes mellitus (DM) and dyslipidemia are coming to the forefront. Generally, protease inhibitors (PI) are implicated in metabolic derangement; however, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) like stavudine can also cause diabetes. Among HIV-infected patients, the prevalence of diabetes is reported to range from 2 to 19%, so there is strong case for screening of diabetes among HIV-infected cases. The South Asian Consensus Guidelines recommend that both fasting and postprandial glucose values should be checked at screening and during monitoring of therapy. National AIDS Control Organization (NACO) recommends fasting plasma glucose with value ≥ 126 mg% diagnostic of diabetes mellitus. HbA1c may underestimate the degree of hyperglycemia in HIV-infected individuals and may not be a good diagnostic tool. Lifestyle modification is recommended as part of treatment. Metformin should be used with caution in HIV patients. Concomitant use of metformin with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) can cause lactic acidosis. Thiazolidinediones should be the drug of choice in HIV, particularly in patients with lipodystrophy. Insulin secretagogues (meglitinides and sulfonylureas) are safe but may not be effective in the presence of severe insulin resistance. There are concerns regarding the use of gliptins in HIV-infected patients as they have molecular targets on immune cells. Insulin should be the drug of choice for HIV-infected patients with marked hyperglycemia (HbA1c > 9%), ketonuria, severe liver disease, or severe kidney disease. SGLT2 inhibitor may increase the risk of urinary tract infection and genital mycotic infections in HIV-infected diabetics. Regarding the use of ART among HIV patients with diabetes, NACO guidelines recommend that Tenofovir, lamivudine, and efavirenz should be used as first-line ART for all new patients, except known cases of severe diabetes, severe hypertension, or renal disease. Tenofovir, lamivudine, and lopinavir/ritonavir should be used as first line in women ever exposed to single dose Nevirapine in the past and also for all confirmed HIV-2 or HIV-1 & 2 coinfected patients. HIV infected with diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria or proteinuria need Abacavir-based regimen (Abacavir + Lamivudine + Efavirenz). There is some suggestion that PI-based regimes should be avoided in patients at high risk of developing diabetes, for example, those with a history of gestational diabetes, positive family history of diabetes, or impaired glucose tolerance on screening.

scholarly journals Avoiding Inpatient Delays in Antiretroviral Therapy via Low Cost Formulary Management

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S436-S436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Sundquist ◽  
Zahra Kassamali
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors ◽  
Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors ◽  
Cd4 Cell Count ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Appropriate Therapy ◽  
Cd4 Cell ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Of 8 formulary HIV medications at our institution, 3 are no longer first line treatments. Agents unavailable on formulary are administered from a patient’s own supply. We examined the impact of availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on time to appropriate therapy among HIV positive inpatients. Methods Adult inpatients who received ART from 11/2015 – 10/2016 were included in this single-center review. Data were evaluated by encounter; individuals with multiple admissions were counted per admit. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the time from admission to ART order and administration. We noted discrepancies between ordered and home ART regimen, and any administration of partial therapy. Patients not taking ART prior to admission or without documentation of a home ART regimen were excluded from the outcomes analysis. A cost analysis was conducted to describe the financial impact of any recommended formulary changes. Results 36 patients with 55 inpatient encounters were evaluated; 46 (84%) had a documented home ART regimen. Mean age was 47.8 years, 67% were male, 36% met criteria for AIDS by CD4 cell count. Creatinine clearance was < 60 ml/minute in 33% of subjects, 25% were admitted for an infectious issue. Median length of stay was 5 days. Half (49%) were taking nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 22% integrase inhibitors, 19% protease inhibitors, 3% non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. In the 7 encounters (15%) with all ART on formulary, 100% received their full ART regimens as inpatients vs. 69% of those with partial or no ART on formulary. Median time to therapy doubled in patients who had partial or no home ART on formulary: 25 hours (median of 1 missed dose) vs.. 12 hours (median of 0 missed doses). Anticipated annual cost of formulary revisions, including addition of 4 agents, was $6016.37. Conclusion Having a complete ART regimen on formulary substantially increased likelihood of complete ART administration without delay. Adding an NRTI alternative to tenofovir was needed due to high rates of renal dysfunction; adding agents with higher barriers to resistance, dolutegravir and darunavir, were important as genotypes and viral loads are not always known at admit. Expanding the ART formulary provides a significant improvement in quality of care at a reasonable cost. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Neuropsychiatric adverse effects of HIV antiviral medication

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S697-S698
Author(s):  
S. Nascimento ◽  
M. Mendes ◽  
C. Solana ◽  
M. Croca ◽  
J. Reis
Keyword(s):  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Antiretroviral Drugs ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors ◽  
Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors ◽  
Neuropsychiatric Complications ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects

IntroductionHIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infection is related to several neuropsychiatric complications, such as dementia, encephalopathy, psychosis, as well as, opportunistic infections of the central nervous system (CNS). The discovery of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has limited these conditions and extended the life span of infected patients into a chronic illness, but it is also associated with neuropsychiatric adverse effects.ObjectivesTo review the literature on the most common neuropsychiatric complications of the ART, since it can be difficult to distinguish drugs toxicity, the effects of the virus, immune system and psycho-social events.MethodsThe authors have conducted an online search in PubMed with the terms: “Psychiatry”, “HIV”, “adverse effects” and “antiretroviral drugs” from 2011 until 2016. From the outcome were collected, analyzed and summarized the articles considered to be relevant.ResultsThe antiretroviral therapy (ART) are associated with a numerous adverse effects on the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as, metabolic, gastrointestinal, cardiac, and other toxicities. The neuropsychiatric effects are common and highly variable, including depression, cognitive impairment and sleep disturbance. The nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are one of the two classes of antiviral drugs most frequently associated with neuropsychiatric complications.ConclusionsThe occurrence of new-onset conditions related to ART makes it difficult to determine the association between psychiatric disorders and ART adverse effects, and given the fact that patients commit to lifelong therapy, as well as, they can diminish quality of life; it makes these assessment important in treating these conditions.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document