scholarly journals A Diffusion Model Analysis of Decision Biases Affecting Delayed Recognition of Emotional Stimuli

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e0146769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly J. Bowen ◽  
Julia Spaniol ◽  
Ronak Patel ◽  
Andreas Voss
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Spaniol ◽  
Holly J. Bowen ◽  
Ronak Patel ◽  
Andreas Voss

Previous empirical work suggests that emotion can influence accuracy and cognitive biases underlying recognition memory, depending on the experimental conditions. The current study examines the effects of arousal and valence on delayed recognition memory using the diffusion model, which allows the separation of two decision biases thought to underlie memory: response bias and memory bias. Memory bias has not been given much attention in the literature but can provide insight into the retrieval dynamics of emotion modulated memory. Participants viewed emotional pictorial stimuli; half were given a recognition test 1-day later and the other half 7-days later. Analyses revealed that emotional valence generally evokes liberal responding, whereas high arousal evokes liberal responding only at a short retention interval. The memory bias analyses indicated that participants experienced greater familiarity with high-arousal compared to low-arousal items and this pattern became more pronounced as study-test lag increased; positive items evoke greater familiarity compared to negative and this pattern remained stable across retention interval. The findings provide insight into the separate contributions of valence and arousal to the cognitive mechanisms underlying delayed emotion modulated memory.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Spaniol ◽  
Holly J. Bowen ◽  
Ronak Patel ◽  
Andreas Voss

Previous empirical work suggests that emotion can influence accuracy and cognitive biases underlying recognition memory, depending on the experimental conditions. The current study examines the effects of arousal and valence on delayed recognition memory using the diffusion model, which allows the separation of two decision biases thought to underlie memory: response bias and memory bias. Memory bias has not been given much attention in the literature but can provide insight into the retrieval dynamics of emotion modulated memory. Participants viewed emotional pictorial stimuli; half were given a recognition test 1-day later and the other half 7-days later. Analyses revealed that emotional valence generally evokes liberal responding, whereas high arousal evokes liberal responding only at a short retention interval. The memory bias analyses indicated that participants experienced greater familiarity with high-arousal compared to low-arousal items and this pattern became more pronounced as study-test lag increased; positive items evoke greater familiarity compared to negative and this pattern remained stable across retention interval. The findings provide insight into the separate contributions of valence and arousal to the cognitive mechanisms underlying delayed emotion modulated memory.


2007 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Christoph Klauer ◽  
Andreas Voss ◽  
Florian Schmitz ◽  
Sarah Teige-Mocigemba

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Vandekerckhove ◽  
Francis Tuerlinckx

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baris Metin ◽  
Herbert Roeyers ◽  
Jan R. Wiersema ◽  
Jaap J. van der Meere ◽  
Margaret Thompson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 847-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke Jepma ◽  
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers ◽  
Guido P. H. Band ◽  
Sander Nieuwenhuis

People typically respond faster to a stimulus when it is accompanied by a task-irrelevant accessory stimulus presented in another perceptual modality. However, the mechanisms responsible for this accessory-stimulus effect are still poorly understood. We examined the effects of auditory accessory stimulation on the processing of visual stimuli using scalp electrophysiology (Experiment 1) and a diffusion model analysis (Experiment 2). In accordance with previous studies, lateralized readiness potentials indicated that accessory stimuli do not speed motor execution. Surface Laplacians over the motor cortex, however, revealed a bihemispheric increase in motor activation—an effect predicted by nonspecific arousal models. The diffusion model analysis suggested that accessory stimuli do not affect parameters of the decision process, but expedite only the nondecision component of information processing. Consequently, we conclude that accessory stimuli facilitate stimulus encoding. The visual P1 and N1 amplitudes on accessory-stimulus trials were modulated in a way that is consistent with multisensory energy integration, a possible mechanism for this facilitation.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Thapar ◽  
Roger Ratcliff ◽  
Gail McKoon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document