scholarly journals Effectiveness of Continuum of Care—Linking Pre-Pregnancy Care and Pregnancy Care to Improve Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e0164965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimiyo Kikuchi ◽  
Sumiyo Okawa ◽  
Collins O. F. Zamawe ◽  
Akira Shibanuma ◽  
Keiko Nanishi ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. e000183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archana Patel ◽  
Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib ◽  
Kunal Kurhe ◽  
Savita Bhargava ◽  
Akash Bang

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. e000004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C Zanoni ◽  
Moherndran Archary ◽  
Sarah Buchan ◽  
Ingrid T Katz ◽  
Jessica E Haberer

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. D'Antonio ◽  
A. O. Odibo ◽  
F. Prefumo ◽  
A. Khalil ◽  
D. Buca ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 393 (10184) ◽  
pp. 1973-1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soha Sobhy ◽  
David Arroyo-Manzano ◽  
Nilaani Murugesu ◽  
Gayathri Karthikeyan ◽  
Vinoth Kumar ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e0237571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayfaa A. Wahabi ◽  
Amel Fayed ◽  
Samia Esmaeil ◽  
Hala Elmorshedy ◽  
Maher A. Titi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dawit Tiruneh ◽  
Nega Assefa ◽  
Bezatu Mengiste

Abstract Background Despite decreasing overall perinatal and maternal mortality in high-income countries, perinatal and maternal health inequalities are persisting in Sub Saharan African countries. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects size of rates and determinants for perinatal mortality in Sub-Saharan countries. Method The sources for electronic datasets were PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google, Google Scholar, and WHO data Library. Observational studies published in the English language from January 01, 2000, to May 30, 2019 were included. STROBE and JBI tools were used to include relevant articles for this review. We used a Comberehensive Meta-Analysis version 2 software for this analysis. The I2 and Q- statistic values were used to detect the level of heterogeneity. The Kendall’s without continuity correction, Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation and Egger’s linear regression tests were used to detect the existence of significant publication bias (P <  0.10). The effects size were expressed in the form of point estimate and odds ratio with 95% CI (P <  0.05) in the random effect analysis using the trim and fill method. Result Twenty-one articles were included in this review. However, only fourteen studies reported the perinatal mortality rate. Among 14 studies, the observed and adjusted PMR was found to be 58.35 and 42.95 respectively. The odds of perinatal mortality among mothers who had no ANC visits was 2.04 (CI: 1.67, 2.49, P <  0.0001) as compared to those who had at least one ANC visit. The odds of perinatal mortality among preterm babies was 4.42 (CI: 2.83, 6.88, P <  0.0001). In most cases, heterogeneity was not evident when subgroup analyses were assessed by region, study design, and setting. Only perinatal mortality (P <  0.0001), antenatal care (P <  0.046) and preterm births (P <  0.034) showed a relationship between the standardized effect sizes and standard errors of these effects. Conclusion In general, engaging in systematic review and meta-analysis would potentially improve under-represented strategies and actions by informing policy makers and program implementers for minimizing the existing socioeconomic inequalities between regions and nations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 589-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Curado ◽  
F. D'antonio ◽  
A. T. Papageorghiou ◽  
A. Bhide ◽  
B. Thilaganathan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margie H Davenport ◽  
Amariah J Kathol ◽  
Michelle F Mottola ◽  
Rachel J Skow ◽  
Victoria L Meah ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review of the relationship between prenatal exercise and fetal or newborn death.DesignSystematic review with random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.Data sourcesOnline databases were searched up to 6 January 2017.Study eligibility criteriaStudies of all designs were included (except case studies) if they were published in English, Spanish or French and contained information on the population (pregnant women without contraindication to exercise), intervention (subjective or objective measures of frequency, intensity, duration, volume or type of exercise, alone [“exercise-only”] or in combination with other intervention components [eg, dietary; “exercise + co-intervention”]), comparator (no exercise or different frequency, intensity, duration, volume and type of exercise) and outcome (miscarriage or perinatal mortality).ResultsForty-six studies (n=2 66 778) were included. There was ‘very low’ quality evidence suggesting no increased odds of miscarriage (23 studies, n=7125 women; OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.21, I2=0%) or perinatal mortality (13 studies, n=6837 women, OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.52, I2=0%) in pregnant women who exercised compared with those who did not. Stratification by subgroups did not affect odds of miscarriage or perinatal mortality. The meta-regressions identified no associations between volume, intensity or frequency of exercise and fetal or newborn death. As the majority of included studies examined the impact of moderate intensity exercise to a maximum duration of 60 min, we cannot comment on the effect of longer periods of exercise.Summary/conclusionsAlthough the evidence in this field is of ‘very low’ quality, it suggests that prenatal exercise is not associated with increased odds of miscarriage or perinatal mortality. In plain terms, this suggests that generally speaking exercise is ‘safe’ with respect to miscarriage and perinatal mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document