scholarly journals Thromboelastometric analysis of the risk factors for return of spontaneous circulation in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e0175257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Koami ◽  
Yuichiro Sakamoto ◽  
Ryota Sakurai ◽  
Miho Ohta ◽  
Hisashi Imahase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract 342: The Relationship Between Time Interval From Collapse to Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Neurologically Intact Survival

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Hiroshi Nonogi ◽  
Naohiro Yonemoto ◽  
David F Gaieski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Neurologically Intact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation are critical to survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, few studies have investigated the relationship between time interval from collapse to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurologically intact survival. Methods: From the All-Japan OHCA Utstein Registry between 2005 and 2015, we enrolled adult patients achieving prehospital ROSC after witnessed OHCA, inclusive of arrest after emergency medical service responder arrival. The study patients were divided into two groups according to initial cardiac arrest rhythm (shockable versus non-shockable). The collapse-to-ROSC interval was calculated as the time interval from collapse to first achievement of prehospital ROSC. The primary endpoint was 30-day favorable neurological outcome after OHCA. Results: A total of 69,208 adult patients achieving prehospital ROSC after witnessed OHCA were enrolled; 23,017(33.3%) the shockable arrest group and 46,191 (66.7%) the non-shockable arrest group. The shockable arrest group compared with the non-shockable arrest group had significantly shorter collapse-to-ROSC interval (16±10 min vs. 20±13 min, P<0.001) and significantly higher frequency of the favorable neurological outcome (54.9% vs. 15.3%, P<0.001). Frequencies of the favorable neurological outcome after shockable OHCA decreased to 1.2% to 1.5% with every minute that the collapse-to-ROSC interval was delayed (78% at 1 minute of collapse, 68% at 10 minutes, 44% at 20 minutes, 34% at 30 minutes, 16% at 40 minutes, 4% at 50 minutes and 0% at 60 minutes, respectively, P<0.001), and those after non-shockable OHCA decreased to 0.8% to 1.8% with every minute that the collapse-to-ROSC interval was delayed (40% at 1 minute of collapse, 26% at 10 minutes, 11% at 20 minutes, 5% at 30 minutes, 2% at 40 minutes, 0% at 50 minutes and 0% at 60 minutes, respectively, P<0.001). Conclusions: Termination of the collapse-to-ROSC interval to achieve neurologically intact survival after witnessed OHCA was 50 minutes or longer irrespective of initial cardiac arrest rhythm (shockable versus non-shockable), although the neurologically intact survival rate was difference between the two groups.

Abstract P82: Implementation Of New Resuscitation Guidelines Takes One-and-a-half Year

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Berdowski ◽  
Andra Schmohl ◽  
Rudolph W Koster
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
World Wide ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Resuscitation Guidelines ◽  
Rhythm Analysis ◽  
New Guidelines ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective- In November 2005, updated resuscitation guidelines were introduced world-wide, and will be revised again in 2010. This study aims to determine how long it takes to implement new guidelines. Methods- This was a prospective observational study. From July 2005 to January 2008, we included all patients with a non traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ambulance paramedics sent all continuous ECG registrations with impedance signal by modem. We excluded ECGs from patients with Return Of Spontaneous Circulation at arrival, incomplete ECG registrations, ECGs with technical deficits or with continuous chest compressions. The same guidelines needed to be used in over 75% of the registration time in order to be labeled. We classified ECGs as guidelines 2000 if the c:v ratio was 15:2, shock blocks were present and there was rhythm analysis after each shock; guidelines 2005 if the c:v ratio was 30:2, a single shock protocol was used and chest compressions was immediately resumed after shock or rhythm analysis in a no shock scenario. We accepted 10% deviations in the amount of compressions (13–17 for 2000 guidelines, 27–33 for 2005). Results- Of the 1703 analyzable ECGs, we classified 827 (48.6%) as guidelines 2000 and 624 (36.6%) as guidelines 2005. In the remaining 252 ECGs (14.8%) 31 used guidelines 1992, 137 applied guidelines 2000 with c:v ratio of 30:2 and 84 did not show distinguishable guideline usage. Since the introduction in November 2005, it took 17 months to apply new guidelines in over 80% of the cases (figure 1 ). Conclusion- Guideline changes are slowly implemented by professionals. This needs to be taken in consideration when new guideline revisions are considered.

Abstract 13131: The Priority of Coronary Arteriography and Therapeutic Hypothermia After Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest. the Result of Sos-kanto 2012 Study

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuichi Hagiwara ◽  
Kiyohiro Oshima ◽  
Masato Murata ◽  
Makoto Aoki ◽  
Kei Hayashida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Therapeutic Hypothermia ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Coronary Arteriography ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Overall Performance ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Aim: To evaluate the priority of coronary angiography (CAG) and therapeutic hypothermia therapy (TH) after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Patients and Methods: SOS-KANTO 2012 study is a prospective, multicenter (69 emergency hospitals) and observational study and includes 16,452 patients with OHCA. Among the cases with ROSC in that study, we intended for patients treated with both CAG and TH within 24 hours after arrival. Those patients were divided into two groups; patients in whom TH was firstly performed (TH group), and the others in whom CAG was firstly done (CAG group). We statistically compared the prognosis between the two groups. SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM, Tokyo, Japan) was used for the statistical analysis. Statistical significance was assumed to be present at a p value of less than 0.05. Result: 233 patients were applied in this study. There were 86 patients in the TH group (M/F: 74/12, mean age; 60.0±15.2 y/o) and 147 in the CAG group (M/F: 126/21, mean age: 63.4±11.1 y/o) respectively, and no significant differences were found in the mean age and M/F ratio between the two groups. The overall performance categories (OPC) one month after ROSC in the both groups were as follows; in the TH group, OPC1: 21 (24.4%), OPC2: 3 (3.5%), OPC3: 7 (8.1%), OPC4: 8 (9.3%), OPC5: 43 (50.0%), unknown: 4 (4.7%), and in the CAG group, OPC1: 38 (25.9%), OPC2: 13 (8.8%), OPC3: 15 (10.2%), OPC4: 18 (12.2%), OPC5: 57 (38.8%), unknown: 6 (4.1%). There were no significant differences in the prognosis one month after ROSC between the two groups. Conclusion: The results which of TH and CAG you give priority to over do not affect the prognosis in patients with OHCA.

THE UTILITY OF END TIDAL CO2 (ETCO2) MONITORING DURING IN-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST TO PREDICT RETURN OF SPONTANEOUS CIRCULATION

CHEST Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 68A
Author(s):  
MICHAEL ROSMAN ◽  
YING (SHELLY) QI ◽  
CAITLIN O'NEILL ◽  
AMANDA MENGOTTO ◽  
JIGNESH PATEL ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
End Tidal ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
End Tidal Co2

Abstract 11817: The Effect of Time to Treatment With Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Shock Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Secondary Analysis of the ALPS Randomized Controlled Trial

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahbod Rahimi ◽  
Paul Dorian ◽  
Sheldon Cheskes ◽  
Gerald Lebovic ◽  
Steve Lin
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Study Drug Administration ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Purpose: The effects of amiodarone and lidocaine on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), relative to time to treatment in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients is unknown. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo (ROC ALPS) randomized trial examining the association of time to treatment with ROSC at emergency department (ED) arrival. Method: In the ROC ALPS trial, adults with non-traumatic OHCA with initial VF/pVT after ≥ 1 shock were randomized to receive amiodarone, lidocaine or placebo. We used logistic regression to examine the association of time to treatment (911 call to study drug administration interval) with ROSC at ED arrival. Results: Overall, 1112 (36.7%) patients had ROSC at ED arrival. Time to treatment data were available for 2994 (99%) of the patients. The proportion of patients with ROSC at ED arrival decreased as time to drug administration increased, in amiodarone (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.94 per min increase), lidocaine (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96) and placebo (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96) arms. The odds of ROSC at ED in the amiodarone group (versus placebo) changed in relation to the time of drug administration (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99). With short times to drug administration, ROSC was higher in amiodarone versus placebo recipients, whereas ROSC was higher with placebo at later times. Comparing lidocaine to placebo, ROSC rate increased at all times (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07-1.59); there was no time to drug administration effect (OR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97-1.03). Among all patients, survival at hospital discharge was 21.0%, 24.4%, and 23.7% for placebo, amiodarone and lidocaine respectively. Conclusion: Amiodarone’s efficacy in restoring ROSC declined with longer duration of arrest, potentially due to its adverse hemodynamic effects. Overall, amiodarone and lidocaine had similar effects on mortality; in this study, ROSC at ED arrival trend did not reflect the overall survival rate

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document