scholarly journals Oral cholera vaccine coverage during a preventive door-to-door mass vaccination campaign in Nampula, Mozambique

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e0198592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Semá Baltazar ◽  
Florentina Rafael ◽  
José Paulo M. Langa ◽  
Sergio Chicumbe ◽  
Philippe Cavailler ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1299-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Schaetti ◽  
Claire-Lise Chaignat ◽  
Raymond Hutubessy ◽  
Ahmed M. Khatib ◽  
Said M. Ali ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kelias Phiri Msyamboza ◽  
Maurice M’bang’ombe ◽  
Hannah Hausi ◽  
Alexander Chijuwa ◽  
Veronica Nkukumila ◽  
...  

Vaccine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1538-1543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraful Islam Khan ◽  
Mohammad Ali ◽  
Fahima Chowdhury ◽  
Amit Saha ◽  
Iqbal Ansary Khan ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e038464
Author(s):  
Godfrey Bwire ◽  
Mellisa Roskosky ◽  
Anne Ballard ◽  
W Abdullah Brooks ◽  
Alfred Okello ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo evaluate the quality and coverage of the campaign to distribute oral cholera vaccine (OCV) during a cholera outbreak in Hoima, Uganda to guide future campaigns of cholera vaccine.DesignSurvey of communities targeted for vaccination to determine vaccine coverage rates and perceptions of the vaccination campaign, and a separate survey of vaccine staff who carried out the campaign.SettingHoima district, Uganda.ParticipantsRepresentative clusters of households residing in the communities targeted for vaccination and staff members who conducted the vaccine campaign.ResultsAmong 209 households (1274 individuals) included in the coverage survey, 1193 (94%; 95% CI 92% to 95%) reported receiving at least one OCV dose and 998 (78%; 95% CI 76% to 81%) reported receiving two doses. Among vaccinated individuals, minor complaints were reported by 71 persons (5.6%). Individuals with ‘some’ education (primary school or above) were more knowledgeable regarding the required OCV doses compared with non-educated (p=0.03). Factors negatively associated with campaign implementation included community sensitisation time, staff payment and problems with field transport. Although the campaign was carried out quickly, the outbreak was over before the campaign started. Most staff involved in the campaign (93%) were knowledgeable about cholera control; however, 29% did not clearly understand how to detect and manage adverse events following immunisation.ConclusionThe campaign achieved high OCV coverage, but the surveys provided insights for improvement. To achieve high vaccine coverage, more effort is needed for community sensitisation, and additional resources for staff transportation and timely payment for campaign staff is required. Pretest and post-test assessment of staff training can identify and address knowledge and skill gaps.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document