scholarly journals Clonality and geographic structure of host-specialized populations of Corynespora cassiicola causing emerging target spot epidemics in the southeastern United States

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e0205849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leilani G. Sumabat ◽  
Robert C. Kemerait ◽  
Dong Kyun Kim ◽  
Yeshwant R. Mehta ◽  
Marin T. Brewer
Plant Disease ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
pp. 974-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Koenning ◽  
T. C. Creswell ◽  
E. J. Dunphy ◽  
E. J. Sikora ◽  
J. D. Mueller

Target spot of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) caused by Corynespora cassiicola (Berk. & Curt.), although found in most soybean-growing countries, is considered to be a disease of limited importance (1) and has never been reported to cause soybean yield loss in the southeastern United States (2,3). Soybean plants submitted to the North Carolina Plant Disease and Insect Clinic (NCPDIC) in August 2004 from Beaufort, Robeson, Wilson, and Johnston counties, NC had symptoms consistent with target spot. Symptoms consisted of roughly circular, necrotic leaf lesions from minute to 11 mm in diameter, though typically approximately 4 to 5 mm in diameter, and with a yellow margin. Large lesions occasionally exhibited a zonate pattern often associated with this disease. Microscopic examination of the lesions revealed the presence of spores (conidia) typical of C. cassiicola (1). Conidia were mostly three to five septate with a central hilum at the base and ranged in size from 7 to 22 wide × 39 to 520 μm long. Three commercial soybean fields near Blackville, SC (Barnwell County) were severely affected by this disease and it caused premature defoliation. Nineteen of twenty-seven maturity group VII and VIII genotypes in the 2004 Clemson University soybean variety trial near Blackville, SC had visible symptoms of target spot. Heavy rainfall associated with hurricanes during September 2004 probably enhanced the incidence of this disease, and yield suppression due to target spot was estimated at 20 to 40% in some fields. In 2005, 20 of 161 soybean samples submitted to the NCPDIC or collected in surveys from 16 counties were positive for target spot on the basis of microscopic examination. Target spot also was diagnosed in six counties (Baldwin, DeKalb, Elmore, Fayette, Macon, and Pickens) in Alabama and in four additional counties (Bamberg, Hampton, Orange-burg, and Calhoun) in South Carolina in 2005. Records from the NCPDIC indicate that target spot had not been diagnosed on soybean in North Carolina since 1981. The large increase in incidence of target spot in the southeast may be related to changes in weather patterns, changes in pathogen virulence, and/or the introduction of more susceptible host genotypes. References: (1) J. B. Sinclair. Target spot. Page 27 in: Compendium of Soybean Diseases. G. L. Hartman et al. eds. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, 1999. (2) J. A. Wrather et al. Plant Dis. 79:1076. 1995. (3) J. A. Wrather et al. On-line publication. doi:10.1094/PHP-2003-0325-01-RV. Plant Health Progress, 2003.


2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (7) ◽  
pp. 892-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leilani G. Sumabat ◽  
Robert C. Kemerait ◽  
Marin Talbot Brewer

Corynespora cassiicola is a ubiquitous fungus causing emerging plant diseases worldwide, including target spot of cotton, soybean, and tomato, which have rapidly increased in incidence and severity throughout the southeastern United States. The objectives of this study were to understand the causes for the emerging target spot epidemics in the United States by comparing phylogenetic relationships of isolates from cotton, tomato, soybean, and other crop plants and ornamental hosts, and through the determination of the host range of isolates from emerging populations. Fifty-three isolates were sampled from plants in the southeastern United States and 1,380 nucleotides from four nuclear loci were sequenced. Additionally, sequences of the same loci from 23 isolates representing each of the distinct lineages of C. cassiicola described from previous studies were included. Isolates clustered based on host of origin, regardless of the geographic location of sampling. There was no genetic diversity detected among isolates from cotton, which were genetically distinct from isolates from other host species. Furthermore, pathogenicity and virulence assays of 40 isolates from various hosts onto cotton, soybean, tomato, and cucumber showed that isolates from cotton were more aggressive to cotton than those from other hosts. Soybean and tomato were most susceptible to isolates that originated from the same host, providing evidence of host specialization. These results suggest that emerging target spot epidemics in the United States are caused by either the introduction of host-specific isolates or the evolution of more aggressive strains on each host.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Hagan ◽  
K. L. Bowen ◽  
B. Miller ◽  
R. L. Nichols

Target spot, caused by Corynespora cassiicola, prematurely defoliates and occasionally reduces cotton yield across the southeastern United States. Reaction of the cultivars Deltapine 1137 B2RF, Deltapine 1252 B2RF, Fibermax 1944 GLB2, PhytoGen 499 WRF, PhytoGen 575 WRF, and Stoneville 6448 GLB2 to target spot and lint yield as influenced by a full-season Headline + Bravo Ultrex fungicide program was assessed for 3 years in southwest Alabama. Significantly greater final % and relative area under the disease curve (relAUC) season-long defoliation was recorded for PhytoGen 499 WRF than the other cultivars, which had similarly lower defoliation values. A significant yield gain of 92 kg of lint/ha valued at $142/ha across all cultivars was obtained with the fungicide program. In addition, PhytoGen 499 WRF and Fibermax 1944 GLB2 had significantly lower defoliation and greater yield gains (189 and 263 kg of lint/ha, respectively) with the fungicide than no fungicide program. Hardlock incidence was greater in 2016 than in preceding years and did not differ by fungicide program. Open and unopen boll counts were similar across all cultivars and fungicide programs. Study results indicate that partially resistant cultivars may be an effective tool for managing target spot in cotton.


2021 ◽  
pp. PHP-04-21-0072-
Author(s):  
Tyler M. Smith ◽  
Heather Y. Kelly ◽  
Kurt H. Lamour

Corynespora cassiicola is the causal pathogen of target spot in soybean and cotton grown in the United States. With target spot increasing in importance, fungicides are becoming an important tool for control of this disease. Unfortunately, there are reports of C. cassiicola isolates in other crops being resistant to some fungicide classes. The objective of this study was to identify if resistance to quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) fungicides is present in Tennessee soybean and cotton isolates of C. cassiicola. Four isolates of C. cassiicola were evaluated at a range of doses for the fungicide pyraclostrobin. Isolates were also sequenced to determine if the G143A mutation was present in the cyt b gene. Two isolates previously reported to be resistant to QoIs were also used as positive checks. Two isolates of C. cassiicola from Tennessee soybean were found to have the G143A mutation. EC50 values for the two isolates ranged from 15.7 to 121 μg/ml. As a result of this study, C. cassiicola isolates have exhibited resistance to QoI fungicides in Tennessee soybean.


Plant Disease ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-447
Author(s):  
H. L. Mehl ◽  
N. S. Dufault ◽  
T. W. Allen ◽  
A. K. Hagan ◽  
P. Price ◽  
...  

Fungicide programs for managing target spot of cotton caused by Corynespora cassiicola were evaluated over 15 site-years in the southeastern United States between 2014 and 2016. Two cultivars, hypothesized to vary in target spot susceptibility, PhytoGen 499WRF (PHY499) and Deltapine 1137B2RF (DPL1137), and four fungicides (azoxystrobin, flutriafol, pyraclostrobin, pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad) plus nontreated control, were compared. Fungicide programs consisted of 1) a single application at first flower or disease onset and 2) the first application followed by a second 14 days later. Treatments were applied in a factorial, randomized complete block design. Target spot onset and severity varied among site-years. Except when severity was low, target spot-associated defoliation was greater on PHY499 than on DP1137. Fungicides delayed disease development and defoliation, but application number had little impact. Based on a meta-analysis of 15 site-years, pyraclostrobin-based applications resulted in a 4 to 6% yield preservation, and yield preservation was greater at site-years with early disease onset and >40% target spot associated defoliation. Results suggest a single well-timed application of a pyraclostrobin-based fungicide reduces defoliation and protects cotton yield at locations with high target spot severity. Additional research is needed to identify risk factors for target spot-associated yield losses in cotton production systems.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Noguera

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a novel mind perception manipulation. Mind perception is currently theorized to be an essential aspect of a number of human social psychological processes. Thus, a successful manipulation would allow for the causal study of those processes. This manipulation was created in an attempt to explore the downstream impact of mind perception on the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories are steadily becoming more and more prominent in social discourse. Endorsement of conspiracy theories are beginning to show real world ramifications such as a danger to human health (e.g., in the anti-vaccination movement). A sample of college students (valid N = 53) from a large rural institution in the southeastern United States participated for course credit. These participants completed a mind perception pretest, were randomly assigned to either the manipulation in question (in which participants are asked to consider the ‘mind’ of several targets and write their thoughts about them) or the control condition, and then they completed a posttest. The mixed ANOVA revealed that the interaction term between Time and Condition was not significant. Because the manipulation did not work, other analyses were aborted, in accord with the pre-registration. My Discussion focuses on the procedures and potential shortcomings of this manipulation, in an effort to lay the groundwork for a successful one.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document