scholarly journals A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e0237804
Author(s):  
Erin Peebles ◽  
Marissa Scandlyn ◽  
Blair R. Hesp
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Peebles ◽  
Marissa Scandlyn ◽  
Blair R. Hesp

AbstractIntroductionPeer review is a volunteer process for improving the quality of publications by providing objective feedback to authors, but also presents an opportunity for reviewers to seek personal reward by requesting self-citations. Open peer review may reduce the prevalence of self-citation requests and encourage author rebuttal over accession. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of self-citation requests and their inclusion in manuscripts in a journal with open peer review.MethodsRequests for additional references to be included during peer review for articles published between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 in BMC Medicine were evaluated. Data extracted included total number of self-citations requested, self-citations that were included in the final published manuscript and manuscripts that included at least one self-citation, and compared with corresponding data on independent citations.ResultsIn total, 932 peer review reports from 373 manuscripts were analysed. At least one additional citation was requested in 25.9% (n=241) of reports. Self-citation requests were included in 44.4% of reports requesting additional citations (11.5% of all reports). Requests for self-citation were significantly more likely than independent citations to be incorporated in the published manuscript (65.1% vs 52.1%; chi-square p=0.003). At the manuscript level, when requested, self-citations were incorporated in 76.6% of manuscripts (n=72; 19.3% of all manuscripts) compared with 68.5% of manuscripts with independent citation requests (n=102; 27.3% of manuscripts). A significant interaction was observed between the presence of self-citation requests and the likelihood of any citation request being incorporated (100% incorporation in manuscripts with self-citation requests alone versus 62.7–72.2% with any independent citation request; Fisher’s exact test p<0.0005).ConclusionsRequests for self-citations during the peer review process are common. The transparency of open peer review may have the unexpected effect of encouraging authors to incorporate self-citation requests by disclosing peer reviewer identity.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. e22475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Jackson ◽  
Malathi Srinivasan ◽  
Joanna Rea ◽  
Kathlyn E. Fletcher ◽  
Richard L. Kravitz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document