scholarly journals Proenzyme Forms of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Serum Improve the Detection of Prostate Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1017-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D Mikolajczyk ◽  
William J Catalona ◽  
Cindy L Evans ◽  
Harry J Linton ◽  
Lisa S Millar ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Pro or precursor forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) have emerged as potentially important diagnostic serum markers for prostate cancer detection. Immunoassays were developed to measure specific proPSA forms containing propeptides of 2, 4, and 7 amino acids [(-2)proPSA, (-4)proPSA, and (-7)proPSA, respectively]. Methods: Research-use dual monoclonal antibody immunoassays using europium-labeled detection monoclonal antibodies were developed for each form of proPSA. Sera from patients with prostate cancer or benign prostate disease containing 4–10 μg/L PSA were assayed and analyzed by area under the ROC curve (AUC) for specificity and sensitivity. Results: The proPSA forms had quantification limits of 0.015–0.025 μg/L in serum, with cross-reactivities <1% with PSA. The sum of the proPSA forms divided by free PSA (percentage proPSA) had a higher AUC than did percentage of (-2)proPSA, free PSA, and complexed PSA with AUC (95% confidence intervals) of 0.69 (0.64–0.74), 0.64 (0.58–0.68), 0.63 (0.58–0.68), and 0.57 (0.51–0.62), respectively. The proPSA comprised a median of 33% of the free PSA in cancer and 25% in noncancer sera (P <0.0001). One-third (33%) of cancer samples had >40% proPSA, whereas only 8% of noncancer samples did (P <0.0001). In men with cancer and >25% free PSA, the (-2)proPSA had an AUC of 0.77 (0.66–0.86), with 90% sensitivity and 36% specificity at 0.04 μg/L. Conclusions: The percentage of proPSA gave better cancer detection in the 4–10 μg/L range than did percentage of free PSA and complexed PSA. (-2)proPSA significantly discriminated cancer in men whose serum had >25% free PSA, for whom there is currently no good marker for cancer detection.

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 921-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flip H. Jansen ◽  
Ron H.N. van Schaik ◽  
Joep Kurstjens ◽  
Wolfgang Horninger ◽  
Helmut Klocker ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (12) ◽  
pp. 5745-5748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pär Stattin ◽  
Ulf-Håkan Stenman ◽  
Elio Riboli ◽  
Göran Hallmans ◽  
Rudolf Kaaks

2004 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Okihara ◽  
Osamu Ukimura ◽  
Terukazu Nakamura ◽  
Yoichi Mizutani ◽  
Akihiro Kawauchi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document