(Don’t) just screenshot it: Ethics of archiving fan misbehaviours

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-32
Author(s):  
Renee Ann Drouin

Despite the field of fandom studies’ interest in fan archives and fan behaviours, little work currently discusses how a fan archivist may approach the curation of a fan behaviour-focused archive. While such an archive may be fraught with ethical dilemmas of documenting others without consent, the archival efforts remark on broader cultural ramifications outside of individual works for a more encompassing view of the fandom itself. This article explores the ethics and understandings of such archives, in which fans have, without institutional training or sponsorship, curated archives dedicated to the misbehaviours and harassment of other fans. I conclude with what academics can learn from their ethical approaches.

Author(s):  
Adriana Schiopoiu Burlea

The aim of this chapter is to examine some of the issues of ethics related to information in DBE. The ethical issue of what is moral to do in order to optimize the use of information in DBE is dealt with. The varied ways of integrating and putting into the practice information in DBE is discussed as well as the great variety of ethical approaches. In the field of ethics of information in DBE we are no longer confronted with “policy vacuum”; we are facing dissipation of ethical responsibility (DER) and this phenomenon leads to difficult and usually late localisation and solving of ethical dilemmas within the system.


This chapter focuses on ethics for the IT professional. The learning objectives for this chapter are to understand basic ethical principles relating to IT, to develop a framework that supports making informed decisions regarding ethical problems, to apply an ethical code in typical situations, and to understand future trends relating to IT ethics. The author includes material on each of these topics and also sections with conclusions and references. After having mastered the material in this chapter, a reader will have a much-better understanding of ethical principles relating to the IT profession. But, more importantly, a reader will be able to make practical use of that knowledge by applying it in the workplace to solve ethical dilemmas.


Author(s):  
Jonathan Herring

This chapter sets out some general theories about ethics. How do we judge what is the right thing to do? What makes a decision morally justifiable? What makes a person good? It considers some ethical disagreements and describes some of the general ethical approaches that are taken to ethical dilemmas. It then addresses the question of whether lawyers’ ethics are any different from others. Finally, it looks at how legal training and legal practice has taken the ethical obligations of lawyers more seriously.


2019 ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Kalomoira K. Sakellaraki

The main problems that Modern Bioethics faces concern mainlythe terms of rights, which feature prominently in the theoreticalisttheories. If classical theories of deontocracy and utilitarianism areapplied to surrogate motherhood, we will be led not only to different butalso opposing decisions. Bioethics, nevertheless, ought to make the bestpossible decisions and take into consideration moral aspects and valuesby prioritizing the importance of rights. The correlation between humanrights and ethical approaches is particularly convoluted. Both of them areestablished on the respect of human dignity, the individual’s importanceand the moral integrity of human existence. As regards the moral dilemmasthat arise as to the moral permissiveness of surrogacy, it behoves us toapply a particular ethical theory that wil be uesd as a method of justifyinga certain decison. Therefore, in the case of surrogate motherhood, basicethical theories refer to Intuitionism and Ethical Ethics. A morality whichis reliant foremost on the notion of duty, imperative and obligation. Itexamines the ethical dilemmas and answers the question of what one hasto do based on their individual imperatives and duties.


Author(s):  
Robert C. Macauley

While there exists significant disagreement among bioethicists as to the appropriate course of action in specific cases, there is actually general agreement about how to approach ethical dilemmas. This involves classifying the nature of the dilemma, reviewing existing information, acquiring additional information, analyzing the issue from multiple viewpoints, and formulating a response in light of potential criticisms. Potential analytic viewpoints include principlism, consequentialism, virtue ethics, casuistry, narrative ethics, and the ethics of care. When a clear resolution is not possible, ideally the situation can be temporized or clearly unacceptable options—including rationing at the bedside—eliminated, in the hopes of further resolution eventually occurring.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (Spring) ◽  
pp. 76-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashleigh J. Callahan ◽  
Norman J. Lass ◽  
Kimberly L. Richards ◽  
Andrea B. Yost ◽  
Kristen S. Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Goldie ◽  
Lisa Schwartz ◽  
Alex McConnachie ◽  
Jillian Morrison
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document