Mathematical explanation and indispensability
2018 ◽
Vol 33
(2)
◽
pp. 233
◽
Keyword(s):
This paper discusses Baker’s Enhanced Indispensability Argument (EIA) for mathematical realism on the basis of the indispensable role mathematics plays in scientific explanations of physical facts, along with various responses to it. I argue that there is an analogue of causal explanation for mathematics which, of several basic types of explanation, holds the most promise for use in the EIA. I consider a plausible case where mathematics plays an explanatory role in this sense, but argue that such use still does not support realism about mathematical objects.
2011 ◽
Vol 62
(1)
◽
pp. 143-154
◽
2017 ◽
Vol 49
(1)
◽
pp. 121-126
◽
2018 ◽
Vol 33
(2)
◽
pp. 219
2014 ◽
Vol 29
(1)
◽
pp. 145-169
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):