scholarly journals Current Trends in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus: Analysis of the Korean Foot and Ankle Society (KFAS) Member Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-156
Author(s):  
Byung-Ki Cho ◽  
Jaeho Cho ◽  
Ki Won Young ◽  
Dong Yeon Lee ◽  
Su-Young Bae ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Claassen ◽  
Daiwei Yao ◽  
Sarah Ettinger ◽  
Matthias Lerch ◽  
Kiriakos Daniilidis ◽  
...  

Background. Finding the right diagnoses in patients with complex foot and ankle disorders can be challenging. Single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography (SPECT-CT) has shown to be feasible in foot and ankle surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of SPECT-CT and thereby its impact on final treatment decision compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods. A retrospective study was performed on 49 patients treated at our institution. Experienced foot and ankle surgeons independently, and blinded, analyzed clinical data and radiographs together with MRI, SPECT-CT, or a combination of both. Based on the determined final treatment decision Cohen’s kappa values were calculated to illustrate interrater and intrarater reliability. Results. The kappa values for interrater reliability were higher for SPECT-CT at .68 and MRI + SPECT-CT at .71 compared to 0.38 for MRI alone (P < .05). The kappa values for intrarater reliability of MRI + SPECT-CT were higher at .75 compared with SPECT-CT alone at .67 (P < .05) and MRI at .35 (P < .01). Conclusion. We found a higher interrater and intrarater reliability for SPECT-CT compared with MRI alone for diagnosing complex foot and ankle pathologies. SPECT-CT has a high impact on final treatment decision. The main indications are bony pathologies with diagnostic uncertainty especially in closely adjacent structures as the joints of the midfoot, occult coalitio, stress fractures, verification or exclusion of nonfusion, periprosthetic disorders after total ankle replacement and osteochondral lesion in cases of combined pathologies. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective study


2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1069-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aniruth Gadgil ◽  
Rhys H. Thomas

Background: Few studies exist to guide the best practice in thromboprophylaxis after foot and ankle surgery. A survey of foot and ankle surgeons was performed to assess current trends in thromboprophylaxis. Methods: An email-based survey of American and British foot and ankle surgeons was conducted. Surgeons were questioned as to their use and type(s) of thromboprophylaxis as well as reasons for not using prophylaxis. Surgeons also were asked about their use of thromboprophylaxis in hip and knee arthroplasty, if they did these surgeries. Results: Nearly one-fifth (19%, 27) of surgeons routinely used thromboprophylaxis in both elective and trauma foot and ankle surgery. The most common situation for use was in a postoperative patient who was immobilized and nonweightbearing. A lack of published evidence and a low rate of thromboembolism were the most commonly cited reasons for not using thromboprophylaxis. Conclusions: This survey showed a wide variability in thromboembolic prophylaxis. It suggests that despite the literature indicating to the contrary, a significant proportion of foot and ankle surgeons routinely use thromboprophylaxis. Confusion remains regarding the appropriateness of thromboprophylaxis and what type(s)(if any) should be used. This study has identified a need for more in-depth evaluation of the importance of, and possible prophylaxis against, thromboembolic problems after foot and ankle surgery.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Anand Vora

Cartilage ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 194760352096116
Author(s):  
Oliver Gottschalk ◽  
Sebastian Felix Baumbach ◽  
Sebastian Altenberger ◽  
Daniel Körner ◽  
Matthias Aurich ◽  
...  

Objective Osteochondral lesions of the talus are common injuries, with one of the leading treatment options being the M-BMS (matrix-augmented bone marrow stimulation) + I/III collagen scaffold. Osteotomy of the medial malleolus is not unusual but presents the risk of malunion or irritation by hardware. The aim of the study was to analyze data from the German Cartilage Society (Knorpelregister DGOU) to evaluate the influence of medial malleolar osteotomy on clinical results of M-BMS + I/III collagen scaffold. Design The ankle module of the Cartilage Register includes a total of 718 patients, while 45 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were treated with an M-BMS + I/III collagen scaffold of the medial talus, 30 without and 15 with an osteotomy of the medial malleolus. The follow-up evaluations included FAAM (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure), FAOS (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score), and VAS (visual analogue scale). Results Forty-five patients (22 male, 23 female) aged between 18 and 69 years (mean: 34 years) were included in this study. Between preoperative and 12 months postoperative, we noted a significant improvement in FAAM-ADL (Activity of Daily Living) ( P = 0.004) as well as FAOS-Pain ( P = 0.001), FAOS-Stiffness ( P = 0.047), FAOS-ADL ( P = 0.002), FAOS-Sport ( P = 0.001), and FAOS Quality of Life ( P = 0.009). There was no significant difference between patients who underwent an osteotomy or not. Conclusion The results show a significant improvement in patients’ outcome scores following a M-BMS + I/III collagen scaffold. No statistical difference was noted among those undergoing medial malleolar osteotomy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 849-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Sieradzki ◽  
Nicholas Larsen ◽  
Ivan Wong ◽  
Richard D. Ferkel

Background: Well-designed foot and ankle clinical outcomes research requires region-specific subjective outcome measures. Many foot and ankle–specific instruments are now available. Determining which instruments to choose is daunting. We present a patient survey to determine the most relevant questions pertaining to them. Methods: Sixteen foot and ankle–specific outcome instruments were chosen based on popularity, emphasizing valid, reliable, responsive scores. Subjective portions were consolidated and given to 109 patients with osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) (39), ankle instability (35), and ankle arthritis (35). Outcome instruments were measured according to 4 criteria: number of questions endorsed by 51%, number with high mean importance, number with low mean importance, and number with the highest-ranking frequency importance product. Instruments were then ranked based on relative score, with the highest scores indicating the instrument was the most useful for that sample. Results: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) achieved the highest score in all 4 categories for OLT, followed by Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Foot and Ankle Score. The FAOS achieved the highest score in all 4 categories for ankle instability, followed by FAAM and AAOS. For osteoarthritis, the FAOS achieved the highest relative score followed by FAAM and AAOS. The AOF, Ankle Osteoarthritis Score, and AAS are instruments commonly used that had lower relative scores. Conclusion: The FAOS, FAAM, and AAOS Foot and Ankle Score contain several items important to patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus, ankle instability, and ankle osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-116
Author(s):  
Byung-Ki Cho ◽  
Jaeho Cho ◽  
Heui-Chul Gwak ◽  
Hak Jun Kim ◽  
Su-Young Bae ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002110019
Author(s):  
Machado A. Bruno ◽  
Rassi F. Marcos ◽  
Fonseca V. Wagner ◽  
Filho V. Wagner

Most osteochondral lesions of the first metatarsal head are likely traumatic in etiology. The treatment ranges from microfractures to mosaicplasty. In this case report, we describe a central osteochondral lesion of the first metatarsal head treated with osteochondral graft obtained from the head of the same metatarsal in combination with Moberg osteotomy. After surgical treatment, the patient’s American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Forefoot Scale score improved from 58 to 85, and the range of motion also improved. This technique may be an alternative treatment modality for osteochondral lesions of the first metatarsal. Level of Evidence: Level V


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 157-164
Author(s):  
Jaeho Cho ◽  
Byung-Ki Cho ◽  
Hyun-Woo Park ◽  
Ki-Sun Sung ◽  
Su-Young Bae ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document