Rules of origin in free trade agreements A brief study of the F TA Colombia- USA

2014 ◽  
pp. 32-50
Author(s):  
Marlon Iván Maldonado Narváez
2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Loewen

Some theorists and practitioners argue that the stability of the global trade system is endangered by trade distorting effects of regional Free Trade Agreements. Does this also hold true for interregional FTAs? Based on criteria, such as scope, rules of origin and WTO notification, it is argued here that interregional FTAs between East Asia and Latin America do not fully confirm the distortion thesis, as the positive effects of WTO-plus elements in the examined FTAs and their positive notification record to the WTO signify. Yet, overlaps between different rules of origin may lessen the multilateral effectiveness of interregional FTAs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-646
Author(s):  
Timothy Meyer

AbstractThis Essay argues that trade agreements may overly constrain the ability of states to regulate supply chains for critical products such as medical supplies. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may exacerbate supply chain concentration, especially through loose rules of origin. And WTO rules constrain preventative regulation of supply chain risks designed to prevent a crisis, while providing exceptions for aggressive action only in the face of a crisis. Thus, WTO members risk flouting WTO rules if they do not limit aggressive, preventative supply chain regulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document