scholarly journals 3D fluid-dynamic ovarian cancer model resembling systemic drug administration for efficacy assay_suppl

ALTEX ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Marrella
1983 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Berek ◽  
Neville F. Hacker ◽  
Jacob Zighelboim ◽  
Alan Lichtenstein ◽  
Reba Knox ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anis Feki ◽  
Philip Berardi ◽  
Geoff Bellingan ◽  
Attila Major ◽  
Karl-Heinz Krause ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saya L Jacob ◽  
Erika Cornell ◽  
Michael Kwa ◽  
William E Funk ◽  
Shuai Xu

Abstract There have been numerous controversies surrounding cosmetic products and increased cancer risk. Such controversies include associations between parabens and breast cancer, hair dyes and hematologic malignancies, and talc powders and ovarian cancer. Despite the prominent media coverage and numerous scientific investigations, the majority of these associations currently lack conclusive evidence. In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) made publically available all adverse event reports in Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition’s Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS), which includes complaints related to cosmetic products. We mined CAERS for cancer-related reports attributed to cosmetics. Between 2004 and 2017, cancer-related reports caused by cosmetics represented 41% of all adverse events related to cosmetics. This yielded 4427 individual reports of cancer related to a cosmetic product. Of these reports, the FDA redacted the specific product names in 95% of cancer-related reports under the Freedom of Information Act exemptions, most likely due to ongoing legal proceedings. For redacted reports, ovarian cancer reports dominated (n = 3992, 90%), followed by mesothelioma (n = 92, 2%) and malignant neoplasm unspecified (n = 46, 1%). For nonredacted reports, or those reports whose product names were not withheld (n = 218), 70% were related to ovarian cancer attributed to talc powders, followed by skin cancer (11%) and breast cancer (5%) attributed to topical moisturizers. Currently, CAERS is of limited utility, with the available data having been subjected to significant reporter bias and a lack of supportive information such as demographic data, medical history, or concomitant product use. Although the system has promise for safeguarding public health, the future utility of the database requires broader reporting participation and more complete reporting, paired with parallel investments in regulatory science and improved molecular methods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 889-902
Author(s):  
IRINA M. PELIN ◽  
DANA M. SUFLET

The buccal mucosa is an attractive site for drug administration as it allows avoiding the enzymatic degradation of the drug in the gastrointestinal tract and its hepatic metabolism. For buccal administration, different drug delivery systems with controlled mucoadhesion have been developed and some of them are available on the market. Mucoadhesion makes it possible to obtain prolonged, local or systemic drug action, and this process is highly influenced by several factors, among which, the reactivity of macromolecules from the formulations is very important. Polysaccharides are increasingly studied due to their abundance in natural resources, low-cost availability and easy chemical modification, but also due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability and non-toxicity properties. This review briefly describes the advantages of using the buccal route of drug administration, the influencing factors that are taken into account for obtaining mucoadhesive dosage forms, and the main polysaccharides and their derivatives used for fabrication of buccal drug delivery systems.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (33) ◽  
pp. 55022-55038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Paris ◽  
Franca Podo ◽  
Francesca Spadaro ◽  
Laura Abalsamo ◽  
Maria Elena Pisanu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 956-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Hinchcliff ◽  
Shannon Neville Westin ◽  
Graziela Dal Molin ◽  
Christopher J LaFargue ◽  
Robert L. Coleman

The use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition is transforming care for the treatment of ovarian cancer, with three different PARP inhibitors (PARPi) gaining US Food and Drug Administration approval since 2014. Given the rapidly expanding use of PARPi, this review aims to summarize the key evidence for their use and therapeutic indications. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the development of PARPi resistance and the emerging role of PARPi combination therapies, including those with anti-angiogenic and immunotherapeutic agents.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 174550571775069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurie Markman

There is considerable interest and enthusiasm within the clinical gynecologic oncology community regarding the potential for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors to play a critically relevant role in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer and particularly (although not exclusively) in the setting of known mutations in the BRCA gene. This review will briefly highlight the biological rational for the use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in this malignancy, followed by summary of currently available clinical data supporting the delivery of agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for non-investigative use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document