scholarly journals Intraocular Foreign Body in the Posterior Chamber

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 515-518
Author(s):  
Hana Park ◽  
Jae Hyung Lee ◽  
Ho Ra
2021 ◽  
pp. 875647932110332
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Fish

Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB) present differently depending on the type of material (wood, glass, metal) for the IOFB, extent of the injury, and location of the injury. IOFB and the injury can cause a perforation or penetration of the globe which can require more extensive treatment including surgery. Proper evaluation of the IOFB and injury can help to determine extent of the injury, the prognosis of the vision, and health of the eye before and after treatment but may be difficult for the physician depending on the view of the posterior chamber being compromised by media or simply by patient sensitivity. The extent of the injury may also prevent proper evaluation due to swelling, lacerations on the lids, or pain. Proper ophthalmic sonography can provide a quick evaluation of the globe for any IOFB in both the outpatient setting as well as emergency department setting. Evaluation via sonography may allow the physician to accurately diagnose and properly treat the patient to help restore and prevent further loss of vision.


Eye ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajai K Tyagi ◽  
Sundeep Kheterpal ◽  
Andrew B Callear ◽  
Graham R Kirkby ◽  
Nicholas J Price

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-23
Author(s):  
Štěpán Rusňák ◽  
Lenka Hecová

Purpose: Penetrating eye trauma with an intraocular foreign body is very frequent, especially in men in their productive age. Pars plana vitrectomy would be the standard surgical method at our department. However, in indicated cases (metallic intraocular bodies in the posterior eye segment in young patients with well transparent ocular media without detached ZSM and without any evident vitreoretinal traction) transscleral extraction of the intraocular foreign body is performed using the exo magnet, eventually endo magnet with a minimal PPV without PVD induction under the visual control of endo-illumination. Materials and Methods: Between June 2003 and June 2018, 66 eyes of 66 patients diagnosed with a penetrating eye trauma caused by an intraocular foreign body located in the posterior eye segment were treated. In 18 eyes (27,3 %) with a metallic foreign body in vitreous (body) or in retina, no PPV or a minimal PPV without PVD was used as a surgical method. In the remaining 48 eyes (72,7 %), a standard 20G, respectively 23G PPV method were used together with PVD induction and the foreign body extraction via endo or exo magnet. Conclusions: As demonstrated by our survey/study, in the cases of a thoroughly considered indication an experimented vitreoretinal surgeon can perform a safe NCT transscleral extraction from the posterior eye segment via exo magnet, eventually endo magnet under the visual control of a contact display system with a minimal PPV. Thereby, the surgeon can enhance the patient´s chance to preserve their own lens and its accommodative abilities as well as reduce the risk of further surgical interventions of the afflicted eye.


Author(s):  
Samir Mohammed El-Baha ◽  
Mohsen Ahmed Abou Shousha ◽  
Tarek Abdelrazek Hafez ◽  
Islam S. H. Ahmed

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (jan23 1) ◽  
pp. bcr2013202904-bcr2013202904 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lapira ◽  
D. Karl ◽  
H. Murgatroyd

1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. McCarthy ◽  
Jose S. Pulido ◽  
Bonnie Soukup

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-693
Author(s):  
Miklós D Resch ◽  
Anikó Balogh ◽  
Gábor L Sándor ◽  
Zsuzsanna Géhl ◽  
Zoltán Zsolt Nagy

Introduction: Vitrectorhexis is an alternative for manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis originally developed for paediatric cataract surgery. The aim of our study was the evaluation of the technique in adult patients with penetrating ocular injury and traumatic cataracts. Methods: Eight eyes of 8 patients (23–41 years, all males) had penetrating mechanical corneal trauma. Anterior lens capsule was penetrated in all cases and additional posterior capsule defect in five cases. Intraocular foreign body was detected in one case in the crystalline lens and in two cases in the posterior segment. Standard 23G infusion cannula and vitreous cutter were applied to perform anterior capsule opening, removal of lens material, anterior vitrectomy and pars plana vitrectomy if needed. No phacoemulsification or irrigation/aspiration probe was used. Results: Vitrectorhexis could be performed in 7 out of 8 cases with the preservation of peripheral anterior capsule; primary implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lens was possible in all cases (in the bag in three eyes and into the sulcus in five eyes). Anterior chamber was stable in all cases intraoperatively, and no dropped nucleus or lens fragment loss was observed. Surgery was combined with pars plana vitrectomy in three cases, with foreign body removal (when necessary). No postoperative complication occurred. Conclusion: Vitrectorhexis was found to be an effective and safe alternative method in the management of complex anterior segment trauma cases. With its use, traditional cataract surgical devices can be substituted and additional benefits of vitreous cutter can be utilized in selected cases, especially in young adults.


1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Billi ◽  
G. Lesnoni ◽  
C. Scassa ◽  
M.A. Giuliano ◽  
A.M. Coppè ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lik Thai Lim ◽  
Vikas Shankar ◽  
Robert A Blum ◽  
Harold M Hammer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document