La Vita beati Braulii episcopi et confessoris (BHL 1448n) transmitida por El Escorial, Biblioteca del Real Monasterio de San Lorenzo, P.III.5 (s. XV): editio princeps y estudio

Euphrosyne ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 149-167
Author(s):  
José C. MARTÍN
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 341-374
Author(s):  
Ana María Rodado Ruiz
Keyword(s):  

Este trabajo tiene como objeto el análisis material de la primera edición del Cancionero de Juan del Encina, un incunable castellano publicado por primera vez en 1496, en la imprenta salmantina de Juan de Porras. El estudio atiende a los distintos aspectos de la materialidad del impreso, que pueden revelar información acerca de los criterios de compilación, secuenciación y disposición de las obras, y aportar indicios sobre los objetivos del autor. Además, se examinan dos de los ejemplares conservados de la editio princeps: los que se guardan en la Biblioteca de la RAE y en la del Monasterio de San Lorenzo de El Escorial.


Moreana ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (Number 181- (3-4) ◽  
pp. 9-68
Author(s):  
Jean Du Verger

The philosophical and political aspects of Utopia have often shadowed the geographical and cartographical dimension of More’s work. Thus, I will try to shed light on this aspect of the book in order to lay emphasis on the links fostered between knowledge and space during the Renaissance. I shall try to show how More’s opusculum aureum, which is fraught with cartographical references, reifies what Germain Marc’hadour terms a “fictional archipelago” (“The Catalan World Atlas” (c. 1375) by Abraham Cresques ; Zuane Pizzigano’s portolano chart (1423); Martin Benhaim’s globe (1492); Martin Waldseemüller’s Cosmographiae Introductio (1507); Claudius Ptolemy’s Geographia (1513) ; Benedetto Bordone’s Isolario (1528) ; Diogo Ribeiro’s world map (1529) ; the Grand Insulaire et Pilotage (c.1586) by André Thevet). I will, therefore, uncover the narrative strategies used by Thomas More in a text which lies on a complex network of geographical and cartographical references. Finally, I will examine the way in which the frontispiece of the editio princeps of 1516, as well as the frontispiece of the third edition published by Froben at Basle in 1518, clearly highlight the geographical and cartographical aspect of More’s narrative.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Ammann
Keyword(s):  

Die Druckerei Froben produzierte im 16. Jahrhundert vier wegweisende Editionen des jüdisch-hellenistischen Schriftstellers Flavius Josephus: Sowohl die griechische editio princeps als auch drei sehr populäre lateinische Fassungen erschienen bei der Basler Offizin. In dieser Untersuchung werden Entstehung und Rezeption ebendieser Ausgaben rekonstruiert. Auf welchen Wegen gelangten griechische Josephushandschriften nach Basel? Nach welchen Methoden wurden sie von Frobens Mitarbeitern ediert und übersetzt? Warum wurden diese Editionen zu Bestsellern, und wie wehrte sich die Offizin gegen Raubdrucke? Durch die Beantwortung dieser und verwandter Fragen entsteht eine Fallstudie, welche sowohl zur Überlieferungs- und Rezeptionsgeschichte des Josephus als auch zum Basler Buchdruck neue Einsichten bietet.


2005 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. S129
Author(s):  
Cyphers ◽  
Zúñiga ◽  
Di Castro
Keyword(s):  

Allergy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 936-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Palomares ◽  
Eva Untersmayr ◽  
Jan Gutermuth ◽  
Ioana Agache ◽  
Sofia Ajeganova ◽  
...  

Elenchos ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-232
Author(s):  
Christian Vassallo

AbstractSince the editio princeps, PSI XI 1215 has been recognized as a fragment of a Socratic dialogue. After the first studies on its philological aspects and probable authorship, however, the text has not drawn the attention of historians of ancient philosophy, and this important Socratic evidence has long been totally neglected. This paper reviews the history of scholarship on the Florentine fragment and presents a new critical edition, on the basis of which it tries to give for the first time a historico-philosophical reading of the text. This interpretation aims to demonstrate: a) that the Socratic philosopher who is writing had not a low cultural level, and the fragment presupposes an accurate knowledge of Plato’s political thought, as Medea Norsa and Girolamo Vitelli already supposed with regard to Book 8 of Plato’s Republic; b) that the fragment in question can be attributed to a Socratic dialogue which was most likely composed in the first half of the 4th century BC; c) that both philosophical and textual arguments support the attribution of the fragment to a dialogue of Antisthenes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document