Wellbore stability analysis of fractured formations based on Hoek-Brown failure criterion

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianshou Ma ◽  
Zixin Yang ◽  
Ping Chen
2018 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 166-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyedalireza Khatibi ◽  
Azadeh Aghajanpour ◽  
Mehdi Ostadhassan ◽  
Oveis Farzay

SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 1957-1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Liu ◽  
Yanhui Han ◽  
Hui–Hai Liu ◽  
Younane N. Abousleiman

Summary When drilling through naturally fractured formations, the existence of natural fractures affects the fluid diffusion and stress distribution around the wellbore and induces degradation of rock strength. For chemically active formations, such as shale, the chemical–potential difference between the drilling mud and the shale–clay matrix further complicates the nonmonotonic coupled pore–pressure processes in and around the wellbore. In this work, we apply a recently formulated theory of dual–porosity/permeability porochemoelectroelasticity to predict the time evolution of mud–weight windows, while calculating stresses and pore pressure around an inclined wellbore drilled in a fractured shale formation. The effects of natural–fracture geometric and spatial distributions coupled with the chemical activity are considered in the wellbore–stability analysis. To account for the degrading effect of the fractured shale matrix on the bulk rock strength, a modified Hoek–Brown (MHB) criterion is developed to more closely describe the in–situ state of stress effects on the compressive shearing strength at great depth. Compared with the original Hoek–Brown (HB) failure criterion, the MHB criterion considers the influence of the intermediate principal stress and thus shows better agreement with true–triaxial data for various rocks at varying stress levels. The MHB criterion converges to the original HB criterion when the confining in–situ stresses are equal. Two field case studies indicate that this novel integrative methodology is capable of predicting the operational drilling–mud–weight windows used in these two cases. Another advantage of this newly developed technique is that it can be used as a back–analysis tool to estimate the fracture–matrix permeability from field operational data.


SPE Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (04) ◽  
pp. 1178-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Mehrabian ◽  
Younane Abousleiman

Summary Wellbore tensile failure is a known consequence of drilling with excessive mud weight, which can cause costly events of lost circulation. Despite the successful use of lost-circulation materials (LCMs) in treating lost-circulation events of the drilling operations, extensions of wellbore-stability models to the case of a fractured and LCM-treated wellbore have not been published. This paper presents an extension of the conventional wellbore-stability analysis to such circumstances. The proposed wellbore geomechanics solution revisits the criteria for breakdown of a fractured wellbore to identify an extended margin for the equivalent circulation density (ECD) of drilling. An analytical approach is taken to solve for the related multiscale and nonlinear problem of the three-way mechanical interaction between the wellbore, fracture wings, and LCM aggregate. The criteria for unstable propagation of existing near-wellbore fractures, together with those for initiating secondary fractures from the wellbore, are obtained. Results suggest that, in many circumstances, the occurrence of both incidents can be prevented, if the LCM blend is properly engineered to recover certain depositional and mechanical properties at downhole conditions. Under such optimal design conditions, the maximum ECD to which the breakdown limit of a permeable formation could be enhanced is predicted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document