Full-energy-chain greenhouse-gas emissions: a comparison between nuclear power, hydropower, solar power and wind power

2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joop F. van de Vate
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gas Emissions ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Wind Power ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Solar Power ◽  
Gas Emissions ◽  
Full Energy ◽  
Energy Chain

scholarly journals Power Using, Economic Structure and Sustainable Development in the Vietnamese Economy

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Quang Thai ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gas Emissions ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Essential Element ◽  
Economic Structure ◽  
Electricity Production ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Output Analysis ◽  
Gas Emissions ◽  
Input Output Analysis

Electricity is an essential element for the production and the consumption in any economy. Electricity can be generated by thermoelectricity, hydroelectricity, nuclear power, solar power and wind power, etc.Each method of electricity production can make the level of greenhouse gas emissions of the economy differently. This study adopted Input - Output analysis method to examine the electricity requirments and greenhouse gas emissions in the Vietnamese economy.

Our Energy Inheritance: Nuclear Power

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hewitt Crane ◽  
Edwin Kinderman ◽  
Ripudaman Malhotra
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gas Emissions ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Nuclear Waste ◽  
Energy Security ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Environmental Benefits ◽  
Nuclear Technology ◽  
Value Judgments ◽  
Gas Emissions ◽  
The World

Of the various alternatives to fossil energy, nuclear power is the most advanced and the best positioned to become a major source of energy. It is also essentially free of CO2 emissions, and if reducing greenhouse gas emissions is truly the highest concern, then we will have to develop nuclear power. Yet developing nuclear power would also pose challenges in terms of waste disposal, and proliferation of nuclear weapons including the risk of a terrorist organization acquiring such weapons. To some environmentalists nuclear power presents a serious, dilemma. Support or opposition to nuclear power is strongly affected by value judgments as well as lack of disseminated information on questions: What happens if there is leakage of nuclear waste someday? To what extent would people and the world be affected? Would we be trading international security for energy security—does nuclear power increase our vulnerability to terrorist attacks? The mixture of clear benefits with outstanding questions currently allows some nations to embrace nuclear power, some to accept it grudgingly, and still others choose to ignore it. Given its availability and environmental benefits, nuclear is an option that cannot be ignored if we are to tackle the energy problem in a serious way. To assume that we can store and safeguard the waste for thousands of years may be hubris, but we come out in favor of developing nuclear technology in part because we already have to store the legacy nuclear waste that has been generated over the last 50 years. Another 60 or so years of waste will represent a marginal addition to that enormous task, but it would buy us badly needed time to carefully develop other energy sources that do not entail net greenhouse gas emissions. Also, we find that many of the concerns raised against the development of nuclear power are vastly exaggerated. For example, as we describe in this chapter, safe storage of the waste does not require 10,000 years: if we use reprocessing technologies, the remaining waste could be rendered benign in a couple of centuries.

scholarly journals Marginal greenhouse gas emissions displacement of wind power in Great Britain

Energy Policy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 201-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Camilla Thomson ◽  
Gareth P. Harrison ◽  
John P. Chick
Keyword(s):  
Great Britain ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Emissions ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Wind Power ◽  
Gas Emissions

Greenhouse-gas emissions from solar electric- and nuclear power: A life-cycle study

Energy Policy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 2549-2557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilis M. Fthenakis ◽  
Hyung Chul Kim
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Emissions ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Gas Emissions ◽  
Life Cycle Study

Coal is set for growth in Japan despite solar boom

2016 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Saving ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Emissions ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Solar Power ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Plant Construction ◽  
Power Stations ◽  
Climate Regulation ◽  
Local Opposition

Subject The outlook for Japan's energy sector. Significance Japan's efforts to restart nuclear power stations have been slow and susceptible to local opposition. Generous subsidies have sparked a boom in solar power, but generators are also planning new coal plant construction, threatening Japan's record on greenhouse gas emissions. Impacts Energy-saving measures mean electricity demand will probably stabilise or fall. Growing coal use will provide cheap baseload power, but plants are at risk from future climate regulation. A lack of diversity in renewables without nuclear power will entrench dependence on energy commodities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document