Compositionality and the Pragmatics of Conceptual Combination

Author(s):  
Fintan J. Costello ◽  
Mark T. Keane
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Struiksma ◽  
M. L. Noordzij ◽  
L. Barsalou ◽  
A. Postma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suhail Matar ◽  
Julien Dirani ◽  
Alec Marantz ◽  
Liina Pylkkänen

AbstractDuring language comprehension, the brain processes not only word meanings, but also the grammatical structure—the “syntax”—that strings words into phrases and sentences. Yet the neural basis of syntax remains contentious, partly due to the elusiveness of experimental designs that vary structure independently of meaning-related variables. Here, we exploit Arabic’s grammatical properties, which enable such a design. We collected magnetoencephalography (MEG) data while participants read the same noun-adjective expressions with zero, one, or two contiguously-written definite articles (e.g., ‘chair purple’; ‘the-chair purple’; ‘the-chair the-purple’), representing equivalent concepts, but with different levels of syntactic complexity (respectively, indefinite phrases: ‘a purple chair’; sentences: ‘The chair is purple.’; definite phrases: ‘the purple chair’). We expected regions processing syntax to respond differently to simple versus complex structures. Single-word controls (‘chair’/‘purple’) addressed definiteness-based accounts. In noun-adjective expressions, syntactic complexity only modulated activity in the left posterior temporal lobe (LPTL), ~ 300 ms after each word’s onset: indefinite phrases induced more MEG-measured positive activity. The effects disappeared in single-word tokens, ruling out non-syntactic interpretations. In contrast, left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) activation was driven by meaning. Overall, the results support models implicating the LPTL in structure building and the LATL in early stages of conceptual combination.


2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Estes ◽  
Lara L. Jones

AbstractWe evaluate whether evidence from conceptual combination supports the relational priming model of analogy. Representing relations implicitly as patterns of activation distributed across the semantic network provides a natural and parsimonious explanation of several key phenomena observed in conceptual combination. Although an additional mechanism for role resolution may be required, relational priming offers a promising approach to analogy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dermot Lynott ◽  
Louise Connell

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fintan Costello ◽  
Mark T. Keane

2020 ◽  
Vol 225 (3) ◽  
pp. 995-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Lin ◽  
Yangwen Xu ◽  
Huichao Yang ◽  
Guangyao Zhang ◽  
Meimei Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document