Biomechanics and load resistance of small-diameter and mini dental implants: a review of literature

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Istabrak Hasan ◽  
Christoph Bourauel ◽  
Torsten Mundt ◽  
Helmut Stark ◽  
Friedhelm Heinemann
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Istabrak Hasan ◽  
Friedhelm Heinemann ◽  
Monika Schwegmann ◽  
Ludger Keilig ◽  
Helmut Stark ◽  
...  

AbstractSmall diameter (mini) dental implants have become more popular in recent years as alternatives to classical implant treatment in clinical cases with critical bony situations. However, an in-depth scientific analysis of the mechanical and biomechanical effects of small diameter implants has not yet been published. The aim of the present study was to investigate experimentally different commercial mini implants by measuring their displacements under immediate loading. Twelve commercially available mini implants were measured. Implants were inserted into porcine mandibular segments and loaded by means of a predefined displacement of 0.5 mm of the loading system. The implants were loaded at an angle of 30° to the implant long axis using the self-developed biomechanical hexapod measurement system. Implant displacements were registered. The experimental results were compared to the numerical ones from a previous study. Measured implant displacements were within the range of 39–194 μm. A large variation in the displacements was obtained among the different implant systems due to the different designs and thread profiles. Comparing experimental and numerical results, the displacements that were obtained numerically were within the range of 79–347 μm. The different commercial mini implants showed acceptable primary stability and could be loaded immediately after their insertion.


2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 100458
Author(s):  
Scott P. Campbell ◽  
Christopher J. Kim ◽  
Armand Allkanjari ◽  
Brent Nose ◽  
J. Patrick Selph ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Bhagyashri Bachate ◽  
AGandhewar Mahesh ◽  
MNagaral Suresh ◽  
Girija Dodamani ◽  
Ronad Sunil ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dennis Flanagan

Mini dental implants can be used to support crowns and partial and complete dentures in compromised edentulous sites. Lack of bone width or site length may be treated with mini implants. Mini implants have less percutaneous exposure and displacement that may reduce complications. Nonetheless, mini implants transmit about twice the load to the supporting bone and thus control of occlusal loading is important. In fixed prosthetics, rounded flat cusps, splinting, implant protective occlusal schemes and only placement in dense bone sites are features of successful mini implant treatment. With removable prosthetics, multiple mini implants may be needed for appropriate retention and load resistance. Maxillary lateral incisor and mandibular incisor sites may be best suited for mini implant treatment.Caveat: Past research of dental implants has been directed at standard sized implants. While mini implants are dental implants, indeed, they behave somewhat differently under functional load and the clinician should be circumspect and very judicious in their use.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
D.R. Prithviraj ◽  
Rachana Srivastava ◽  
Satyam Gaur ◽  
Abhishekha Patil ◽  
Sounder Raj K ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dan Tran ◽  
Janina Deeb ◽  
Pandora Wojnarwsky ◽  
George Deeb

This report describes the use of a temporary dental implant to secure a radiographic fiducial marker and patient tracking tag to an edentulous mandible for dynamically guided implant placement into a fibula microvascular free flap. A small diameter dental implant was placed into the anterior mandible to secure a radiographic fiducial marker followed by a patient tag. The patient tag allowed for tracking of the patient’s mandible during placement of endosseous dental implants. Four endosseous dental implants were successfully placed into the edentulous fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction. Dynamic navigation using a small diameter implant to secure radiographic fiducial markers and patient tags provides a novel technique to place implants into an edentulous microvascular free flap with minimal incision and reflection of soft tissue.


2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. e138-e143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Flanagan

Small-diameter, or mini, dental implants have been successfully used to support removable and fixed oral prostheses. These implants impart about twice the per-square-millimeter force on the supporting bone and this should be addressed during treatment planning. In the posterior jaws, bite forces are of a higher magnitude than in the anterior jaws and may induce an overload of the supporting bone and failure of the osseointegration. Thus there should not be occlusal contact in functional excursions that induce off axial loads. The cases presented herein demonstrate that mini dental implants may be used successfully to support fixed partial dentures in mandibular sites in highly selected patients. Attention should be given to the bone density of the site, very slow seating rotation of the implant with intermissions or cooling during insertion, observation of a 4-month healing time, flapless placement, treatment of any existing periodontitis, an insoluble cement, and exclusion of occlusal contact in functional excursions. Importantly, a narrow, rounded occlusal table should be used to minimize off axial loads and an insoluble luting cement should be used to prevent loosening of the crowns due to dissolution of the cement and an overload of the retained implant with any residual cement-retained in the retainer. The implant that supports the cement retained retainer will be subjected to leveraged rotation that may destroy the osseointegration and result in exfoliation of the implant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document