External Quality Assessment of Stat Test Intralaboratory Turnaround Times. Pilot Study from the Members of the Working Group for the Standardization and Promotion of Turnaround Time Control under the Auspices of the Comitato Italiano per la Standardizzazione die Metodi Ematologici e di Laboratorio

Author(s):  
Mauro Negri ◽  
Paolo Carraro ◽  
Gianfranco Caenaro ◽  
Piero Cappelletti ◽  
Davide Giavarina ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175
Author(s):  
Kafui Kouassi ◽  
Lochina Fétéké ◽  
Selom Assignon ◽  
Ameyo Dorkenoo ◽  
Gado Napo-Koura

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Göran Nilsson ◽  
Jeffrey R Budd ◽  
Neil Greenberg ◽  
Vincent Delatour ◽  
Robert Rej ◽  
...  

Abstract A process is described to assess the commutability of a reference material (RM) intended for use as a calibrator, trueness control, or external quality assessment sample based on the difference in bias between an RM and clinical samples (CSs) measured using 2 different measurement procedures (MPs). This difference in bias is compared with a criterion based on a medically relevant difference between an RM and CS results to make a conclusion regarding commutability. When more than 2 MPs are included, the commutability is assessed pairwise for all combinations of 2 MPs. This approach allows the same criterion to be used for all combinations of MPs included in the assessment. The assessment is based on an error model that allows estimation of various random and systematic sources of error, including those from sample-specific effects of interfering substances. An advantage of this approach is that the difference in bias between an RM and the average bias of CSs at the concentration (i.e., amount of substance present or quantity value) of the RM is determined and its uncertainty estimated. An RM is considered fit for purpose for those MPs for which commutability is demonstrated.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vi20
Author(s):  
M.G. Denis ◽  
I. Rouquette ◽  
A. Morel ◽  
C. Villalva ◽  
A. Lespagnol ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 4356-4360 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. Scott ◽  
N. Gous ◽  
B. E. Cunningham ◽  
B. D. Kana ◽  
O. Perovic ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimira Rimac ◽  
Anja Jokic ◽  
Sonja Podolar ◽  
Jelena Vlasic Tanaskovic ◽  
Lorena Honovic ◽  
...  

Introduction: Autovalidation (AV) is an algorithm based on predefined rules designed, among others, to automate and standardize the postanalytical phase of laboratory work. The aim of this study was to examine the overall opinion of Croatian medical biochemistry laboratories regarding various aspects of AV. Material and methods: This retrospective study is an analysis of the responses of a survey about AV comprised of 18 questions, as part of Module 10 (“Postanalytical phase of laboratory testing”) of national External Quality Assessment program, administered by the Croatian Centre for Quality Assessment in Laboratory Medicine. Results were reported as percentages of total number of participants in survey or as proportions of observed data if the overall number of data was <100. Results: 121 laboratories responded to the survey, of which 76% do not use AV, while 11% of laboratories use AV in routine laboratory work. 16/29 laboratories implemented semi-automated AV for general biochemistry (7/29), haematology (5/29), and coagulation (4/29) tests. Analytical measurement ranges, critical values, flags from analysers, interference indices and delta check were the most commonly used rules in the algorithm. 12/29 laboratories performed validation of AV with less than 500 samples (8/29). 7/13 laboratories report the percentage of AV being 20-50%, while 10/13 answered that introduction of AV significantly reduced turnaround time (TAT) (for 20 - 25%), especially for biochemistry tests. Conclusions: Despite of its numerous benefits (i.e. shorter TAT, less manual validation, standardization of the postanalytical phase), only a small number of Croatian laboratories use AV.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document