Changes in incidence of iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm births over time: a population-based study

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miha Lucovnik ◽  
Andreja Trojner Bregar ◽  
Lili Steblovnik ◽  
Ivan Verdenik ◽  
Ksenija Gersak ◽  
...  

AbstractTo examine the proportion of iatrogenic births among all preterm births over a 26-year period.A registry-based survey of preterm deliveries between 1987 and 2012 analyzed by the onset of labor: spontaneous with intact membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) or iatrogenic. Stratification into categories by gestation (22 weeks to 27 weeks and 6 days, 28 weeks to 31 weeks and 6 days, 32 weeks to 33 weeks and 6 days, 34 weeks to 36 weeks and 6 days) was performed. Preterm birth rates were analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel linear-by-linear associationOverall preterm birth rate was 5.9% (31328 deliveries) including 2358 (0.4%) before 28 completed weeks, 3388 (0.6%) between 28 weeks and 31 weeks 6 days, 3970 (0.8%) between 32 weeks and 33 weeks and 6 days, and 21611 (4.1%) between 34 weeks and 36 weeks and 6 days There was an increase in overall preterm birth rate (P<0.001). The rate of iatrogenic preterm births and PPROM increased over time (P<0.001 and P<0.014, respectively). Rates of spontaneous preterm birth decreased (P<0.001). After accounting for potential confounders, year of birth remained an independent risk factor for iatrogenic preterm delivery in all four gestational age categories (P<0.001).The incidence of iatrogenic preterm birth is increasing with a concomitant decrease in the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth. Attempts to analyze, interpret and decrease preterm birth rates should consider spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm births separately.

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (09) ◽  
pp. 703-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Carter ◽  
Sharon Fowler ◽  
Alan Holden ◽  
Elly Xenakis ◽  
Donald Dudley

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-415
Author(s):  
Jelena Ivandić ◽  
Isaac Blickstein ◽  
Ana-Maria Šopić Rahelić ◽  
Eduard Eškinja ◽  
Tea Štimac

AbstractObjectiveLittle information exists related to the contribution of assisted reproductive technology (ART) twins to the preterm and very preterm birth rate. We sought to examine this contribution over a period of more than two decades in a tertiary perinatal center.MethodsWe identified all preterm births from 1993 to 2017, born at <37 or <32 weeks’ gestation, by mode of conception [in vitro fertilization (IVF) vs. non-IVF pregnancies]. We generated trend lines of the annual change of the dependent variable (% preterm birth).ResultsWe evaluated 74,299 births, including 3934 (5.3%) preterm births at <37 and 826 (1.1%) at <32 weeks’ gestation. In this period, 1019 (1.4%) twin pairs were born including 475 (46.6%) and 80 (7.8%) at <37 and <32 weeks, respectively. There were 213 (5.4%) IVF pregnancies among the preterm births at <37 weeks, including 88 (41.3%) twins. Fifteen (1.8%) births of all IVF gestations were at <32 weeks, and all were twins. Whereas the annual rate of spontaneous twins did not change, a significant increase over time exists for IVF twins (P < 0.05, R2 = 0.6). We demonstrated an increase in IVF twin births at <37 weeks but not for spontaneously conceived twins. Whereas the twin birth rate at <32 weeks did not change over time, all preterm births at <32 weeks following IVF were twins.ConclusionThe risk of twins after ART increasingly contributes to preterm births at <37 weeks and ART twins are at significant risk for preterm births at <32 weeks.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 885-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Nilza Lima Medeiros ◽  
Nádia Carenina Nunes Cavalcante ◽  
Fabrício José Alencar Mesquita ◽  
Rosângela Lucena Fernandes Batista ◽  
Vanda Maria Ferreira Simões ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the last menstrual period (LMP) estimate in determining pre and post-term birth rates, in a prenatal cohort from two Brazilian cities, São Luís and Ribeirão Preto. Pregnant women with a single fetus and less than 20 weeks' gestation by obstetric ultrasonography who received prenatal care in 2010 and 2011 were included. The LMP was obtained on two occasions (at 22-25 weeks gestation and after birth). The sensitivity of LMP obtained prenatally to estimate the preterm birth rate was 65.6% in São Luís and 78.7% in Ribeirão Preto and the positive predictive value was 57.3% in São Luís and 73.3% in Ribeirão Preto. LMP errors in identifying preterm birth were lower in the more developed city, Ribeirão Preto. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of LMP for the estimate of the post-term birth rate was very low and tended to overestimate it. LMP can be used with some errors to identify the preterm birth rate when obstetric ultrasonography is not available, but is not suitable for predicting post-term birth.


2016 ◽  
Vol 214 (1) ◽  
pp. S221-S222
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Antony ◽  
R. Alan Harris ◽  
Judy Levison ◽  
Bertha Banda ◽  
Grace Chiudzu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 210 (1) ◽  
pp. S257-S258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjersti Aagaard ◽  
Judy Levison ◽  
Bertha Banda ◽  
Andrew Chigayo ◽  
Owen Chilaga ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bouchra Koullali ◽  
Maud D. van Zijl ◽  
Brenda M. Kazemier ◽  
Martijn A. Oudijk ◽  
Ben W. J. Mol ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document