scholarly journals Objective recording of fetal movements in late pregnancy

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (s1) ◽  
pp. 142-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Maršál ◽  
K. Lindström ◽  
U. Ulmsten
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (138) ◽  
pp. 20170593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefaan W. Verbruggen ◽  
Bernhard Kainz ◽  
Susan C. Shelmerdine ◽  
Joseph V. Hajnal ◽  
Mary A. Rutherford ◽  
...  

Mechanical forces generated by fetal kicks and movements result in stimulation of the fetal skeleton in the form of stress and strain. This stimulation is known to be critical for prenatal musculoskeletal development; indeed, abnormal or absent movements have been implicated in multiple congenital disorders. However, the mechanical stress and strain experienced by the developing human skeleton in utero have never before been characterized. Here, we quantify the biomechanics of fetal movements during the second half of gestation by modelling fetal movements captured using novel cine-magnetic resonance imaging technology. By tracking these movements, quantifying fetal kick and muscle forces, and applying them to three-dimensional geometries of the fetal skeleton, we test the hypothesis that stress and strain change over ontogeny. We find that fetal kick force increases significantly from 20 to 30 weeks' gestation, before decreasing towards term. However, stress and strain in the fetal skeleton rises significantly over the latter half of gestation. This increasing trend with gestational age is important because changes in fetal movement patterns in late pregnancy have been linked to poor fetal outcomes and musculoskeletal malformations. This research represents the first quantification of kick force and mechanical stress and strain due to fetal movements in the human skeleton in utero , thus advancing our understanding of the biomechanical environment of the uterus. Further, by revealing a potential link between fetal biomechanics and skeletal malformations, our work will stimulate future research in tissue engineering and mechanobiology.


2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 87-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Sjöström ◽  
Lil Valentin ◽  
Thomas Thelin ◽  
Karel Maršál

2014 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Brown ◽  
Jayawan H.B. Wijekoon ◽  
Anura Fernando ◽  
Edward D. Johnstone ◽  
Alexander E.P. Heazell

Author(s):  
Andrea M. Peat ◽  
Tomasina Stacey ◽  
Robin Cronin ◽  
Lesley M. E. McCowan

2003 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Sjöström ◽  
Thomas Thelin ◽  
Karel Maršál ◽  
Lil Valentin

Author(s):  
Andrew Weeks ◽  
Julia P. Polk

Induction of labour has been described for many centuries. However, as fetal outcomes improve in general and the safety of the induction process increases, it is increasingly used to reduce the risk of adverse fetal outcomes in late pregnancy. Common obstetric indications include postdates pregnancy, hypertension, spontaneous membrane rupture, fetal growth restriction, and reduced fetal movements. Increased background risk is also an indication with potential benefits for women with increased age, body mass index, and a ‘bad obstetric history’. Induction without medical indication also appears to be safe and does not increase maternal or fetal adverse outcomes. A wide variety of induction methods are available and the choice between them depends on availability and setting. Vaginal dinoprostone, oral misoprostol, and the balloon catheter are all effective and safe methods.


2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (12) ◽  
pp. 1345-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Victoria Holm Tveit ◽  
Eli Saastad ◽  
Babill Stray-Pedersen ◽  
Per E Børdahl ◽  
J Frederik Frøen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document