Getting Younger

Rhizomata ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-95
Author(s):  
Daniel Vázquez
Keyword(s):  

Abstract I argue that in Plato’s Parmenides 141a6–c4, things in time come to be simultaneously older and younger than themselves because a thing’s past and present selves are both real. As a result, whatever temporal relation is predicated of any of these past and present selves is true of the thing in question. Unlike other interpretations, this reading neither assumes that things in time have to replace their parts, nor that time is circular. I conclude that the passage is committed to a conception of the ongoing present and a rejection of presentism and endurantism in favour of a growing universe theory and perdurantism.

Author(s):  
Xinxiao Wu ◽  
Ruiqi Wang ◽  
Jingyi Hou ◽  
Hanxi Lin ◽  
Jiebo Luo

Dialogue ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-282
Author(s):  
Tom L. Beauchamp

Hume notoriously maintains that contiguity, succession, and constant conjunction are individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions of causation. While his arguments for the necessity of constant conjunction have been thoroughly dissected, his arguments for contiguity and succession have generally been either ignored or misstated. I hope both to correct this unfortunate state of affairs and to show some fatal defects in Hume's account.The pertinent passages in Hume's writings acknowledge three conceivable ways in which the temporal relation between causes and effects might be construed: (i) as separated by some interval; (ii) as perfectly contiguous, so that the effect succeeds the cause in the very next moment; (iii) as perfectly contemporaneous, existing at the same moment. Hume defends the correctness of (ii) and denies the tenability of both (i) and (iii).


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narichika Nomoto ◽  
Hirokazu Masataki ◽  
Osamu Yoshioka ◽  
Satoshi Takahashi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document