Detection of anger emotion in dialog speech using prosody feature and temporal relation of utterances

Author(s):  
Narichika Nomoto ◽  
Hirokazu Masataki ◽  
Osamu Yoshioka ◽  
Satoshi Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Xinxiao Wu ◽  
Ruiqi Wang ◽  
Jingyi Hou ◽  
Hanxi Lin ◽  
Jiebo Luo

Dialogue ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-282
Author(s):  
Tom L. Beauchamp

Hume notoriously maintains that contiguity, succession, and constant conjunction are individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions of causation. While his arguments for the necessity of constant conjunction have been thoroughly dissected, his arguments for contiguity and succession have generally been either ignored or misstated. I hope both to correct this unfortunate state of affairs and to show some fatal defects in Hume's account.The pertinent passages in Hume's writings acknowledge three conceivable ways in which the temporal relation between causes and effects might be construed: (i) as separated by some interval; (ii) as perfectly contiguous, so that the effect succeeds the cause in the very next moment; (iii) as perfectly contemporaneous, existing at the same moment. Hume defends the correctness of (ii) and denies the tenability of both (i) and (iii).


Author(s):  
Luís Filipe Cunha

In European Portuguese, both the Condicional (approximately corresponding to the English structure would + Infinitive) and the construction ir (‘go’) in the Imperfect + Infinitive express posteriority with respect to a given past interval. In this paper, I show that, in spite of their seemingly similar behaviour, these two forms diverge in a number of significant aspects. In particular, and taking into account the analysis of contexts such as if-clauses and some subordinate complement clauses introduced by factive and intensional verbs, I will argue that, while the Condicional is mainly used to provide modal information, even losing its basic temporal value, the structure ir (‘go’) in the Imperfect + Infinitive always induces a temporal relation of futurity in a past domain, irrespective of the possible modal meanings accompanying it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document