scholarly journals Burial traditions in early Mid-Holocene Island Southeast Asia: new evidence from Bubog-1, Ilin Island, Mindoro Occidental

Antiquity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (370) ◽  
pp. 901-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred Pawlik ◽  
Rebecca Crozier ◽  
Riczar Fuentes ◽  
Rachel Wood ◽  
Philip Piper

Abstract

Antiquity ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 81 (313) ◽  
pp. 523-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue O'Connor

New dates by which modern humans reached East Timor prompts this very useful update of the colonisation of Island Southeast Asia. The author addresses all the difficult questions: why are the dates for modern humans in Australia earlier than they are in Island Southeast Asia? Which route did they use to get there? If they used the southern route, why or how did they manage to bypass Flores, whereHomo floresiensis, the famous non-sapienshominin known to the world as the ‘hobbit’ was already in residence? New work at the rock shelter of Jerimalai suggests some answers and new research directions.


Antiquity ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (344) ◽  
pp. 292-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred F. Pawlik ◽  
Philip J. Piper ◽  
Rachel E. Wood ◽  
Kristine Kate A. Lim ◽  
Marie Grace Pamela G. Faylona ◽  
...  

Abstract


Antiquity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (364) ◽  
pp. 1023-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rintaro Ono ◽  
Adhi Agus Oktaviana ◽  
Marlon Ririmasse ◽  
Masami Takenaka ◽  
Chiaki Katagiri ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Marwick

The Hoabinhian is a distinctive Pleistocene stone artefact technology of mainland and island Southeast Asia. Its relationships to key patterns of technological change both at a global scale and in adjacent regions such as East Asia, South Asia and Australia are currently poorly understood. These key patterns are important indicators of evolutionary and demographic change in human prehistory so our understanding of the Hoabinhian may be substantially enhanced by examining these relationships. In this paper I present new evidence of ancient Hoabinhian technology from Northwest Thailand and examine connections between Hoabinhian technology and the innovation of other important Pleistocene technological processes such as radial core geometry. I present some claims about the evolutionary significance of the Hoabinhian and recommend future research priorities.


1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry Nguyen-Long

This paper examines the trade in ceramics from northern Vietnam into island Southeast Asia in the third quarter of the seventeenth century. It focuses on two issues: the question of typology of Vietnamese ceramics and the feasibility of these wares entering the southern Philippines during the years 1663–82. The compilation of an accurate typology has been inhibited by exceedingly brief descriptions in trade records, and the difficulty has been further compounded by the fact that although the Dutch East India Company (VOC) records show Vietnamese ceramics were imported into Batavia and dispersed to regional godowns, no material has yet been reported from either archaeological excavations or accidental finds in island Southeast Asia that can with certainty be ascribed to this era. Furthermore, items proposed in the ceramic literature as wares exported to Southeast Asia in the seventeenth century are, in the face of new evidence, no longer convincing. The typology put forward in this paper is based on VOC trade records and the contemporary literature. It broadly matches material from archaeological sites in Vietnam and in Japan that are from co-eval contexts. Previously untapped archaeological findings from Vietnam contribute a new dimension to this issue.


Antiquity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (367) ◽  
pp. 163-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuno Vasco Oliveira ◽  
Sue O'Connor ◽  
Peter Bellwood

Abstract


Antiquity ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 63 (240) ◽  
pp. 587-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Spriggs

As with conventional definitions of the Neolithic anywhere, the concept in this region relies on there being an agricultural economy, the traces of which are largely indirect. These traces are artefacts interpreted as being linked to agriculture, rather than direct finds of agricultural crops, which are rare in Island Southeast Asia. This definition by artefacts is inevitably polythetic, particularly because many of the sites which have been investigated are hardly comparable. We can expect quite different assemblages from open village sites as opposed to special use sites such as burial caves, or frequentation caves that are used occasionally either by agriculturalists while hunting or by gatherer-hunter groups in some form of interaction with near-by agricultural populations. And rarely is a full range of these different classes of sites available in any one area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document