Chapter 1—Bone Grafts and Bone Graft Substitutes: A Brief History

2009 ◽  
pp. 3-3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
CT Laurencin ◽  
CT Laurencin ◽  
Y Khan
2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3791-3797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Clauss ◽  
Andrej Trampuz ◽  
Olivier Borens ◽  
Marc Bohner ◽  
Thomas Ilchmann

2021 ◽  
pp. 197-273
Author(s):  
Jae Hyuk Yang ◽  
Juliane D. Glaeser ◽  
Linda E. A. Kanim ◽  
Carmen Y. Battles ◽  
Shrikar Bondre ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 649-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. De Long ◽  
Thomas A. Einhorn ◽  
Kenneth Koval ◽  
Michael McKee ◽  
Wade Smith ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Lu ◽  
Qi-Yang Wang ◽  
Jia-Gen Sheng

Nonunion with bone defects, a common complication after long bone fracture, is a major challenge for orthopaedic surgeons worldwide because of the high incidence rate and difficulties in achieving successful treatment. Bone defects are the main complications of nonunion. The conventional biological treatments for nonunion with bone defects involve the use of autologous bone grafts or bone graft substitutes and cell-based therapy. Traditional nonunion treatments have always been associated with safety issues and various other complications. Bone grafts have limited autologous cancellous bone and there is a risk of infection. Additionally, problems with bone graft substitutes, including rejection and stimulation of bone formation, have been noted, and the health of the stem cell niche is a major consideration in cell-based therapy. In recent years, researchers have found that exosomes can be used to deliver functional RNA and mediate cell-to-cell communication, suggesting that exosomes may repair bone defects by regulating cells and cytokines involved in bone metabolism. In this review, we highlight the possible relationships between risk factors for nonunion and exosomes. Additionally, we discuss the roles of exosomes in bone metabolism and bone regeneration.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
ASHISH SHAH ◽  
SAMEER NARANJE ◽  
IBUKUNOLUWA ARAOYE ◽  
OSAMA ELATTAR ◽  
ALEXANDRE LEME GODOY-SANTOS ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare union rates for isolated subtalar arthrodesis with and without the use of bone grafts or bone graft substitutes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 135 subtalar fusions with a mean follow-up of 18 ± 14 months. The standard approach was used for all surgeries. Graft materials included b-tricalcium phosphate, demineralized bone matrix, iliac crest autograft and allograft, and allograft cancellous chips. Successful subtalar fusion was determined clinically and radiographically. Results: There was an 88% (37/42) union rate without graft use and an 83% (78/93) union rate with bone graft use. Odds ratio of union for graft versus no graft was 0.703 (95% CI, 0.237-2.08). The average time to union in the graft group was 3 ± 0.73 months and 3 ± 0.86 in the non-graft group, with no statistically significant difference detected (p = 0.56). Conclusion: Graft use did not improve union rates for subtalar arthrodesis. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document