Use of Resilient Modulus Test Results in Flexible Pavement Design

Author(s):  
S Nazarian ◽  
I Abdallah ◽  
A Meshkani ◽  
L Ke
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 509
Author(s):  
Otto Mora L. ◽  
Michel Murillo A. ◽  
Tiana Rosania A. ◽  
Abraham Castañeda A. ◽  
Rosa Pinto C. ◽  
...  

A comparative analysis was carried out to observe the variation of a flexible pavement structural thickness, due to the use of different meth-ods to calculate the CBR design value, as an essential variable to estimate the Subgrade Resilient Modulus (Mr) through an empirical corre-lation. The Asphalt Institute Method and the Mean Criterion Method were applied to calculate de Design CBR value of a homogeneous roadway division from a representative track section located in the Bolivar Department, Colombia. As a result, the Design Percentiles of the CBR design unit were expanded for the Asphalt Institute method, thus, allowing the approach of more reliable and safe designs, considering that this method limits the selection percentiles to three traffic levels.  


POROS TEKNIK ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Utami Sylvia Lestari ◽  
Nurhafni Karina Resentia

Traffic load repetition is the main variable in flexible pavement layers design. In addition, a soil bearing capacity factor is also required for determining the thickness of the flexible pavement layer so that the pavement had been designed will be in good perfomance during the that period. The determination of thickness layers using the 2002 method (Pt T-01-2002 B) is based on the traffic load during the design period and subgrade resilient modulus value. Meanwhile the 2017 method (Pavement design manual No. 04/SE/Db/2017), layers thickness was determined based on traffic load and CBR subgrade value. Based on the calculation using both methods, the pavement layers thickness with the pavement design manual 2017 method is more thick than 2002 method. While the ESAL calculation using both methods, the 2002 method value is more larger than the pavement design manual 2017 method.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (21) ◽  
pp. 4567-4576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ridvan Ozel Mehmet ◽  
Mohajerani Abbas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document